The Daily Shill

Canceled2

Banned
payn090310_13_cmyk20090313023117.jpg
 
i thought it was great. bout time. stewart grilled his ass and made him admit his (crimes)
failures, he looked like a kid caught with his hand in the cookie jar. love the way the right defended him before he went on stewarts show.
 
Hey Crashtestdummy... how about puttin down the crack pipe and cluing us in on what's happening on your wavelength? Because you are apparently on a different one than Ice Dancer.
 
Cramer admitted to manipulating the market on false rumors in fact even bragged about it. Guess that's ok in rightwing world.
 
Cramer admitted to manipulating the market on false rumors in fact even bragged about it. Guess that's ok in rightwing world.

You know, I wish you pinheads would attempt to make some fucking sense! The original post is a cartoon of Jon Stewart dressed as an Obama cheerleader. The comments by you and Crashedinthehead make absolutely no sense with regard to that cartoon. Did someone take you guys off your meds?

........the weirdo racist from Seinfeld bragged about bilking the markets? What???
 
I think they thought it was a continuation of that other thread where Stewart clearly told Cramer that what he did was criminal. That is the "CNBC sucks" portion of the cartoon.

And nobody was defending Cramer here.
 
How very sad this little cartoon is.

Obama is doing the right things to make this country function once again and by supporting Him and his efforts some fucking idiots think this is a bad thing?

Its funny its mostly those who wanted people distroyed for not supporting Bush while he was fucking EVERYTHING up.

Some people just can not recognise what is actaully good for the country and what is bad for it.

You guys are now the laughing stocks of politics , get used to it.

History has proven that the current form of conservatism is a completely failed set of ideas.
 
I think they thought it was a continuation of that other thread where Stewart clearly told Cramer that what he did was criminal. That is the "CNBC sucks" portion of the cartoon.

And nobody was defending Cramer here.

I posted the cartoon because I think it nails Stewart's hyopcrisy! Where was Stewart in taking on Franks? Franks who came out in July 08 telling everyone to invest in Freddie and Fannie because they were strong? Franks who knew the real trouble they were in. I'll tell ya why, because Franks was not railing against Obama like Cramer, Franks is an Obama supporter. So the cheer-leader outfit in light of his hypocritical out-rage was fitting IMO. I think anyone who bought into Cramer's silly so called financial advice were suckers...but then who else watches CNBC?
 
How very sad this little cartoon is.

Obama is doing the right things to make this country function once again and by supporting Him and his efforts some fucking idiots think this is a bad thing?

Its funny its mostly those who wanted people distroyed for not supporting Bush while he was fucking EVERYTHING up.

Some people just can not recognise what is actaully good for the country and what is bad for it.

You guys are now the laughing stocks of politics , get used to it.

History has proven that the current form of conservatism is a completely failed set of ideas.

Just for you!

cb0313awj20090313065712.jpg
 
You just dont get it do you ID?

What you expected has not happened.

That is a line from a video game my son used to play when he was little.


They would give you this when you tried something that did not work in a attempt to direct you to the correct path that would bring success in the game.

Your ideas have failed and the more you attempt to pretend they have not failed is not going to make anything better. You will just continue to try and claim that you are right and in time it will be proven so. You can now spend your entire life defending failed ideas and looking ever increasingly insane or you can face the truth that the ideas you were sold on long ago produced something other than what you thought they would.

What you expected has not happened!


People back Obama in the numbers they do because his ideas are going to work.

There is historical precedenet that shows they will work, There is also historical precendent that shows that your ideas do not work.


Backing and supporting what has been proven to work is not partisan.

Backing and supporting what has been proven not to work is partisan.


Stewart is allowed to support what works (Obamas ideas) and not have to be considered a partisan.

You well....not so much.
 
You just dont get it do you ID?

What you expected has not happened.

That is a line from a video game my son used to play when he was little.


They would give you this when you tried something that did not work in a attempt to direct you to the correct path that would bring success in the game.

Your ideas have failed and the more you attempt to pretend they have not failed is not going to make anything better. You will just continue to try and claim that you are right and in time it will be proven so. You can now spend your entire life defending failed ideas and looking ever increasingly insane or you can face the truth that the ideas you were sold on long ago produced something other than what you thought they would.

What you expected has not happened!


People back Obama in the numbers they do because his ideas are going to work.

There is historical precedenet that shows they will work, There is also historical precendent that shows that your ideas do not work.


Backing and supporting what has been proven to work is not partisan.

Backing and supporting what has been proven not to work is partisan.


Stewart is allowed to support what works (Obamas ideas) and not have to be considered a partisan.

You well....not so much.


What failed that did not work? A capitalist system that is and always has been cyclical? A capitalist system that does require intelligent regulatory over-sight that was not done because of inept and on the take politicians? A capitalist sytem that had greedy politicians and investors running amuck while shills like you swallow the BS excuses as to why we are in trouble?

Stewart was right on in calling out Cramer, but he is also a hypocrite for not calling out the likes of a mutual Obama cheerleader like Franks! He's a shill, the cartoon is right-on!

It's you who are a few bricks short of the chimney.
 
Oh so now deregulation is not part of your conservative ideas?

So the entire fucking time you defended the actions of the asshole you voted for no matter what he did is just gone poof?

The whole "oh the poor picked on corporations" bullshit your team has spewed for decades now just never exsisted?


What you expected has not happened, dont expect a new outcome while trying it again and again and again and again and again and agian and so on and so on.


Get some new ideas that actually work instead of believing crap we told you would fail.
 
You know, I wish you pinheads would attempt to make some fucking sense! The original post is a cartoon of Jon Stewart dressed as an Obama cheerleader. The comments by you and Crashedinthehead make absolutely no sense with regard to that cartoon. Did someone take you guys off your meds?

........the weirdo racist from Seinfeld bragged about bilking the markets? What???


LOLZ
We'll take the Kramer
 
People back Obama in the numbers they do because his ideas are going to work.
People back Obama in those numbers out of desperation. They know that if Obama fails, the republicans will get another shot at it and that is something that terrifies the liberals.

There is historical precedenet that shows they will work, There is also historical precendent that shows that your ideas do not work.
these are theories, not precedent. It could just as easily be determined that FDRs socialist policies actually prolonged the depression.
 
Gotta give Cramer credit, at least he admitted his mistakes, miscalculations and lies, which is more than the rest of the right wing will do. What ever happened to the 'personal responsibility' argument from the radical right?
 
Oh so now deregulation is not part of your conservative ideas?

So the entire fucking time you defended the actions of the asshole you voted for no matter what he did is just gone poof?

The whole "oh the poor picked on corporations" bullshit your team has spewed for decades now just never exsisted?


What you expected has not happened, dont expect a new outcome while trying it again and again and again and again and again and agian and so on and so on.


Get some new ideas that actually work instead of believing crap we told you would fail.

Why don't YOU look at the proof for a change...

You can claim anything you want in print, re-write history to protect your prejudices.
But YOU CAN'T DENY VIDEO


April 2001

President Bush warns Congress about potential trouble with Fanny Mae and Freddy Mac....

Spring 2003

Bush Admin upgrades warning about Fanny and Freddy problems

Fall 2003

John Snow, Bush Treas. Sec. tesifies to Congress about housing sector problems
wants to create an agency to regulate Fannie and Freddy...Barney Frank and Dems. fight against
and claim to see no problems....

Feb. 2005

Greenspan testifies to Congress .. gives more warnings about Freddy and Fannie
says total financial system at risk

April 2005

Greenspan again testifies again and gives warnings...says we must have regulation
This time Schumer defends Freddy and Fannie....legislation block by Dems...

May 2006

MaCain co-sponcers legislation to regulate Freddy and Fannie...bill passed Committee, all Dems
voting against it, all Republicans voting for it....

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cMnSp4qEXNM&NR=1"]YouTube - Timeline shows Bush, McCain warning Dems of financial and housing crisis; meltdown[/ame]
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SCTxZa9kpSI"]YouTube - Mortgage Crisis - Who is Responsible[/ame]
 
Why don't YOU look at the proof for a change...

You can claim anything you want in print, re-write history to protect your prejudices.
But YOU CAN'T DENY VIDEO


April 2001

President Bush warns Congress about potential trouble with Fanny Mae and Freddy Mac....

Spring 2003

Bush Admin upgrades warning about Fanny and Freddy problems

Fall 2003

John Snow, Bush Treas. Sec. tesifies to Congress about housing sector problems
wants to create an agency to regulate Fannie and Freddy...Barney Frank and Dems. fight against
and claim to see no problems....

Feb. 2005

Greenspan testifies to Congress .. gives more warnings about Freddy and Fannie
says total financial system at risk

April 2005

Greenspan again testifies again and gives warnings...says we must have regulation
This time Schumer defends Freddy and Fannie....legislation block by Dems...

May 2006

MaCain co-sponcers legislation to regulate Freddy and Fannie...bill passed Committee, all Dems
voting against it, all Republicans voting for it....

YouTube - Timeline shows Bush, McCain warning Dems of financial and housing crisis; meltdown
YouTube - Mortgage Crisis - Who is Responsible


Quit posting this shit over and over and over again. It's fucking stupid. The Republicans controlled the White House, House and Senate and did nothing from 2003 through 2006 about this huge huge problem that they knew was going to be such a disaster.

The Democrats couldn't have blocked the legislation if they wanted to except by a filibuster. But they didn't have to do that since the Republicans never bothered.
 
Video proof in your face and you still won't accept the facts of history...
stick you head up your ass or in the sand ...whatever works best for you....
YOU CAN'T DENY what you see with your own eyes....

your entitled to remain stupid if you wish...its still a free country


Desh keeps posting her lies, I'll keep posting the truth
 
Shut up kkk tard. The sec was sucking bankerscocks instead of jailing them. Under republican Nazi watch.
 
Back
Top