The coup in the news

The Anonymous

The Anonymous

Bag On My Head
SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'

The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 to reject the review of two 2020 Pennsylvania presidential election cases Monday.

Mass mail-in voting, which was conducted in Pennsylvania for the first time ahead of the 2020 presidential election in November, combined with election rules being rewritten at the last minute, makes the process prone to fraud and mistrust.

The Constitution gives to each state legislature authority to determine the 'manner' of federal elections, Yet both before and after the 2020 election, non-legislative officials in various states took it upon themselves to set the rules instead.

The Pennsylvania Legislature established an unambiguous deadline for receiving mail-in ballots: 8 p.m. on election day. Dissatisfied, the DEMOCRAT-dominated Pennsylvania Supreme Court extended that deadline by three days.

The court also ordered officials to count ballots received by the new deadline even if there was no evidence—such as a postmark—that the ballots were mailed by election day.

These cases provide us with an ideal opportunity to address just what authority non-legislative officials have to set election rules, and to do so well before the next election cycle.

The refusal to do so is inexplicable.


https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2021/02/22/three-supreme-court-justices-believe-pennsylvania-election-case-should-be-review-n2585115
 
Pretty easy to see what is going on here. Instead of going by the LAW they are ruling out of FEAR. They simply do not want to open up this can of worms because it will lead to opening up and even bigger can of worms that could very well tear the country apart even further AND create a constitutional crisis along the way as well. Seems the fraud we all know happened will be allowed to stand because those in power deem it less damaging then what would happen if the fraud was proven and the election overturned. The total chaos that would follow. What has become of our once great Republic......:|
 
Stone said:
Seems the fraud we all know happened will be allowed to stand
Click to expand...

Even the three justices who would have allowed the case to proceed - Alito, Gorsuch and Thomas - acknowledged that the mail-in ballots received after election day would not have been enough to overturn Biden’s victory margin (more than 80,000 votes).

“A decision would not have any implications regarding the 2020 election,”Alito wrote.

So much for “massive fraud”.
 
Stone said:
They simply do not want to open up this can of worms because it will lead to opening up and even bigger can of worms that could very well tear the country apart even further AND create a constitutional crisis along the way as well. Seems the fraud we all know happened will be allowed to stand because those in power deem it less damaging then what would happen if the fraud was proven and the election overturned.
Click to expand...

Well-stated.
 
Stone said:
Things like this could very easily lead to a permanent fracture of our country. Not good.....
Click to expand...

That ship has sailed.

They refuse to deal with the problem at hand, but it never gets fixed for the next time because it's moot.

This is how lower federal courts and some state courts have screwed with legislatures and election law for the past 15 years.

Now the House is voting to override all state election safeguards and mandate mail-in voting forever as we speak.
 
g7ukfijny1y51.jpg
4nabvu.jpg
 
Stone said:
You dont understand what you are doing. Where this all leads. Things like this could very easily lead to a permanent fracture of our country. Not good.....
Click to expand...

I agree, Trump should not have lied to his supporters, he should have conceded gracefully.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top