Billy the Great Khan
Uwaa OmO
No he didn't.you replied to him after this...didn't you?
i mean it...you put him on your ignore list and so will i.
No he didn't.you replied to him after this...didn't you?
i mean it...you put him on your ignore list and so will i.
Yeah, right after you admit that your comment about liberals was just shit-stirring.
The only feasible ways that I see to correct the current situation is to:
1. Vote the liberals out of office and replace with conservatives and libertarians. The 2010 election cycle showed that the people are willing to do this but several more with the same magnitude of results is needed.
2. Let the liberals run the country into bankruptcy, followed by a forced overthrow.
you replied to him after this...didn't you?
i mean it...you put him on your ignore list and so will i.
whats that got to do with registration leading to confiscation?
Well, if the people of California still have the right to own guns, then it proves your contention wrong.
Well, if the people of California still have the right to own guns, then it proves your contention wrong.
Well, if the people of California still have the right to own guns, then it proves your contention wrong.
No he didn't.
As passed by the Congress:
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.As ratified by the States:
A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
So the guns that were registered and then confiscated actually weren't confiscated?Well, if the people of California still have the right to own guns, then it proves your contention wrong.
ok...done
I love you.
So the guns that were registered and then confiscated actually weren't confiscated?
That is ridiculous.
Did CA use the registration to aid in confiscating guns?? Yes. The fact that they didn't take all the guns doesn't change that.
Yes...it does.
Did CA confiscate EVERY SINGLE GUN?
No? then the statement "registration leads to confiscation" is false.
You guys like to make all these scary blanket statements that aren't the truth when it comes down to it.
Why can't you be honest and say that registration led to the voluntary handing over...not "confiscation" of a very limited number of specifically defined weapons?
THAT is the truth...not the previous blanket statement.
Did I say that?
You want to play word games fine...then discuss this with someone else.
Yes or No...do the people of California still have the right to own guns?