The Boebert Crime Family

[Mr.Badguy]

He did what Hunter told him to do.

Ah just like your wife did what I told her to do last night, I understand completely now thank you.

 

[ExpressLane]

Ah just like your wife did what I told her to do last night, I understand completely now thank you.

You obviously haven't met my wife

 

[ExpressLane]

I heard about that. It's not hard to believe that a boy raised by a mom who is rumored to have been an escort and likes to give hand-jobs and smoke in public places would have a problem child.

Don't be cruel

Fetterman applauded for defending Boebert from 'recreational cruelty' online after son's arrest

 

[LurchAddams]

Don't be cruel

Fetterman applauded for defending Boebert from 'recreational cruelty' online after son's arrest

Oh, boy. A trump voter begging for merciful rhetoric? Everyone's irony meter just exploded! Clean up your own house first, then come talk to me! Geez <shaking my head in disbelief.>

 

[ExpressLane]

Oh, boy. A trump voter begging for merciful rhetoric? Everyone's irony meter just exploded! Clean up your own house first, then come talk to me! Geez <shaking my head in disbelief.>

Fetterman voted for Trump???? That stroke must have hit him hard.

<shaking my head in disbelief.>

 

[LurchAddams]

Fetterman voted for Trump???? That stroke must have hit him hard.

<shaking my head in disbelief.> rah:

No, shithead, it was YOU who was asking me for mercy. Don't try to gaslight.

 

[ExpressLane]

No, shithead, it was YOU who was asking me for mercy. Don't try to gaslight.

I posted Fetterman saying you shouldn't be cruel assbearth. If I was gaslighting you I'd use a blowtorch.

 

[Geeko Sportivo]

Pray to who, you godless atheist...?

Pray is intransitive verb meaning- to make a request in an humble manner.

No, I do not waste my time praying to a God that no one can prove exists.

No Sir, I pray to mankind and Karma to deal with your kind of malevolent impetulant behaviors.

 

[QP!]

Show us this "evidence" and get with the "impeachment" already then. Why are they stalling?

Terry has no 'evidence' and we know that as Comer and Jim Jordan have no evidence.

They have accusations that are uncorroborated, the best of which was the Alexander Smirnov ones that proved to be a Russian psy Op and bogus.

But they have nothing, NOTHING, they could present in a court of law, as it is ALL baseless, groundless accusations and speculation, devoid of any demonstrable substantiation.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

Show us this "evidence" and get with the "impeachment" already then. Why are they stalling?

Because, unlike the Democrats they want to do it correctly and actually build a thorough case against Biden rather than cherry pick evidence, operate behind closed doors, try to one-party it, and generally just fuck the whole thing away.

As I understand it, the next thing the Republicans will do is hold public hearings and even give the Democrats their time to question stuff--unlike how the Democrats cut the Republicans out of the process.

 

[ThatOwlWoman]

Terry has no 'evidence' and we know that as Comer and Jim Jordan have no evidence.

They have accusations that are uncorroborated, the best of which was the Alexander Smirnov ones that proved to be a Russian psy Op and bogus.

But they have nothing, NOTHING, they could present in a court of law, as it is ALL baseless, groundless accusations and speculation, devoid of any demonstrable substantiation.

As Goebbels and Hitler proved, facts aren't necessary to convince the willing that a lie is the truth. It's interesting that one of those JPPers most insistent that Biden is guilty has a Goebbels quote in her sig line.

 

[ThatOwlWoman]

Because, unlike the Democrats they want to do it correctly and actually build a thorough case against Biden rather than cherry pick evidence, operate behind closed doors, try to one-party it, and generally just fuck the whole thing away.

As I understand it, the next thing the Republicans will do is hold public hearings and even give the Democrats their time to question stuff--unlike how the Democrats cut the Republicans out of the process.

So -- you have no evidence. Thanks for playing.

 

[Walt]

Looks to me like another case of affluenza.

He committed crimes for profit, so did in fact understand the value of money. That means it is not "affluenza."

 

[T. A. Gardner]

He committed crimes for profit, so did in fact understand the value of money. That means it is not "affluenza."

Affluenza is the condition where you think because you have lots of money and influence / power you can get away with proverbial, if not actual, murder.

 

[Walt]

Affluenza is the condition where you think because you have lots of money and influence / power you can get away with proverbial, if not actual, murder.

Yes, you supposedly fail to understand consequences. You have so much money that you do not realize that everything cannot be bought.

He is stealing money. He understands consequences, and is trying to gain money as a consequence of crimes. It is not affluenza.

 

[Nordberg]

Terry has no 'evidence' and we know that as Comer and Jim Jordan have no evidence.

They have accusations that are uncorroborated, the best of which was the Alexander Smirnov ones that proved to be a Russian psy Op and bogus.

But they have nothing, NOTHING, they could present in a court of law, as it is ALL baseless, groundless accusations and speculation, devoid of any demonstrable substantiation.

They do not need evidence. The Repub thinking is that investigations make outsiders think there has to be something wrong, the old where there is smoke, there, must be fire. So they have investigated Joe for years and have nothing. But simple people like Trumpys, just know they have proven Joe is a crook. Total evidence...zero.