The bloodlust in Christie’s speech against Hillary is not normal. It’s sick.

christiefan915

Catalyst
Contributor
...Chris Christie’s prosecutorial jeremiad against Hillary Clinton on Tuesday night, and the baying bloodlust of the audience, might seem normal. It is not normal.

Christie began by criticizing the Obama administration for failing to hold Clinton accountable for her “dismal record” as secretary of state. “Tonight, as a former federal prosecutor, I welcome the opportunity to hold Hillary Rodham Clinton accountable for her performance and her character,” said Christie. The crowd erupted in chants of “LOCK HER UP! LOCK HER UP!” while Christie smiled and nodded...

A series of charges followed. Some, like Clinton’s mishandling of Libya, were at least partly legitimate. Others were bizarre. At one point, Christie faulted Clinton’s response to the mass kidnapping of schoolgirls in Nigeria, which happened after she left office. After each accusation, he asked, “Is she guilty or not guilty?” Each time, the crowd roared, “Guilty!”

Christie’s speech was logically incoherent. Even if you buy his damning interpretation of Clinton’s foreign policy errors, it doesn't make sense to discuss them as matters of criminal malfeasance. Emotionally, though, that’s in keeping with how Clinton’s bitterest foes talk about her: as a person of absolute corruption, who, through some sort of occult trick, moves through the world with intolerable impunity. As many people pointed out on Twitter, the way that Christie punctuated his inquisitorial brief with the crowd’s cries of “Guilty! Guilty! Guilty!” made him sound less like a contemporary politician than a magistrate condemning a witch...

Hating Hillary is the great theme of this gathering. T-shirts and buttons for sale around the convention revel in it: “Hillary for Prison,” “Life’s a Bitch—Don’t Vote For One,” “I Don’t Often Hate, but When I Do… I Prefer To Hate Hillary Clinton.” It’s the one thing that binds together the GOP now that its nominee has blithely jettisoned many of the party’s central principles. It is also, in its dehumanizing fervor, inescapably intertwined with misogyny. It’s not that Republicans don’t hate men—they obviously despise Barack Obama. But their loathing of Clinton is even more primal. They want to see her not just beaten but destroyed and humiliated, dressed in an orange jumpsuit and locked away. And what we saw on Tuesday night was the delirious loathing of the torch-bearing mob....

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_...christie_and_his_hateful_lock_her_up_mob.html
 
chris+christie.jpg
 
It was creepy. It was ugly.

It's really been the tone of the GOP convention so far. Very little about hope & plans for the future.

It really was. And Christie was the perfect sycophant, even after all the months of Trump busting his chops.
 
Obviously -and as he said - it was an "indictment" of HRClintons lying and malfeasance with her Emails.
The only reason she wasn't indicted was a bizarre reading of "intent" by Comey.
But mostly it was a point by ripping her many foreign policy failures. (Boko was rated "1/2 true" by RCP)

So Christie hammed it up, and ginned up the crowd. You'll be seeing similar themes next week from the Democrats.

see "Lock Her Up" for details on Christies speech/fact checking.

I lost this OP around here:
As many people pointed out on Twitter, the way that Christie punctuated his inquisitorial brief with the crowd’s cries of “Guilty! Guilty! Guilty!” made him sound less like a contemporary politician than a magistrate condemning a witch...

It’s the one thing that binds together the GOP now that its nominee has blithely jettisoned many of the party’s central principles. It is also, in its dehumanizing fervor, inescapably intertwined with misogyny
 
Obviously -and as he said - it was an "indictment" of HRClintons lying and malfeasance with her Emails.
The only reason she wasn't indicted was a bizarre reading of "intent" by Comey.
But mostly it was a point by ripping her many foreign policy failures. (Boko was rated "1/2 true" by RCP)

So Christie hammed it up, and ginned up the crowd. You'll be seeing similar themes next week from the Democrats.

see "Lock Her Up" for details on Christies speech/fact checking.

I lost this OP around here:

Comey's bizarre reading of intent was only surpassed by the bizarre spectacle of Comey playing the role of prosecutor in determining whether to indict or not. Throw in Bill's half hour chat about the grandkids with AG Lynch and the whole thing reeked of corruption.

Yet some deem Christie's speech as the outrage. Go figure.
 
Comey's bizarre reading of intent was only surpassed by the bizarre spectacle of Comey playing the role of prosecutor in determining whether to indict or not. Throw in Bill's half hour chat about the grandkids with AG Lynch and the whole thing reeked of corruption.

Yet some deem Christie's speech as the outrage. Go figure.

You think former republican Comey was paid off by the Clintons or what? I guess judicial impartiality only counts for cons when it involves one of their own.
 
Comey's bizarre reading of intent was only surpassed by the bizarre spectacle of Comey playing the role of prosecutor in determining whether to indict or not. Throw in Bill's half hour chat about the grandkids with AG Lynch and the whole thing reeked of corruption.

Yet some deem Christie's speech as the outrage. Go figure.
Clinton has the entire Obama adm, and especially State to drag out more stuff.
Clinton is still under a FOIA request by Judicial watch( honestly it's difficult to keep all this separate even for me) -
Kendall is trying to squash her testimony.

Then there was the cute dodge by State saying it would take until AFTER the election to release her Emails regarding her
actions supporting the TransPacificPartnership - a key point since she was always for it as the "gold standard"
before Bernie forced her to change her stance.. TPP is a big campaign issue with Trump too.
So getting her Emails could show she was making ( yet another) convenient political dodge....anything to get elected..supported by her minions

She's a slippery character, and the press is her enabler -WaPo is a "shill for Hill" :)
Anytime her shenanigans are actually seen without obscuration by her lackeys ..it's a good thing for the country.
 
You think former republican Comey was paid off by the Clintons or what? I guess judicial impartiality only counts for cons when it involves one of their own.

I'll suggest no theory. But Comey's role is to oversee the investigation---not to weigh evidence. There was no judiciary involved to be impartial.
 
I'll suggest no theory. But Comey's role is to oversee the investigation---not to weigh evidence. There was no judiciary involved to be impartial.

What I see is, anytime she gets investigated, even by republicans, and they can't find anything to pin on her, cons say "the fix is in."

Comey is a lawyer and trained to look at evidence.
 
...Chris Christie’s prosecutorial jeremiad against Hillary Clinton on Tuesday night, and the baying bloodlust of the audience, might seem normal. It is not normal.

Christie began by criticizing the Obama administration for failing to hold Clinton accountable for her “dismal record” as secretary of state. “Tonight, as a former federal prosecutor, I welcome the opportunity to hold Hillary Rodham Clinton accountable for her performance and her character,” said Christie. The crowd erupted in chants of “LOCK HER UP! LOCK HER UP!” while Christie smiled and nodded...

A series of charges followed. Some, like Clinton’s mishandling of Libya, were at least partly legitimate. Others were bizarre. At one point, Christie faulted Clinton’s response to the mass kidnapping of schoolgirls in Nigeria, which happened after she left office. After each accusation, he asked, “Is she guilty or not guilty?” Each time, the crowd roared, “Guilty!”

Christie’s speech was logically incoherent. Even if you buy his damning interpretation of Clinton’s foreign policy errors, it doesn't make sense to discuss them as matters of criminal malfeasance. Emotionally, though, that’s in keeping with how Clinton’s bitterest foes talk about her: as a person of absolute corruption, who, through some sort of occult trick, moves through the world with intolerable impunity. As many people pointed out on Twitter, the way that Christie punctuated his inquisitorial brief with the crowd’s cries of “Guilty! Guilty! Guilty!” made him sound less like a contemporary politician than a magistrate condemning a witch...

Hating Hillary is the great theme of this gathering. T-shirts and buttons for sale around the convention revel in it: “Hillary for Prison,” “Life’s a Bitch—Don’t Vote For One,” “I Don’t Often Hate, but When I Do… I Prefer To Hate Hillary Clinton.” It’s the one thing that binds together the GOP now that its nominee has blithely jettisoned many of the party’s central principles. It is also, in its dehumanizing fervor, inescapably intertwined with misogyny. It’s not that Republicans don’t hate men—they obviously despise Barack Obama. But their loathing of Clinton is even more primal. They want to see her not just beaten but destroyed and humiliated, dressed in an orange jumpsuit and locked away. And what we saw on Tuesday night was the delirious loathing of the torch-bearing mob....

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_...christie_and_his_hateful_lock_her_up_mob.html

The sickness is in Hillary Clintoon who can not actually speak without lying, it's actually very sad
 
What I see is, anytime she gets investigated, even by republicans, and they can't find anything to pin on her, cons say "the fix is in."

Comey is a lawyer and trained to look at evidence.

That's not his job. The FBI is an investigative body---he's a fact gatherer and not a judge. If AG Lynch wanted to recuse herself, she should have really recused herself instead of kind of sorta recusing herself. There are other prosecutors in her department, she should have handed it to a non-political appointee and they should have determined if the evidence was sufficient for an indictment.

As it turned out, it looked for all the world that the fix was in. That's the point: even if there was no fix, it had all the appearances of one. Public confidence in two institutions was eroded but they kept Hillary in the clear.

Apparently that mattered most.
 
Back
Top