The 28th amendment stunt

TOP said:
The t bird guy.... He wants her to run for president🤣🤣🤣🤣 I have the ultimate respect for her as a bad train... None for her as a politician....She's awful...
Click to expand...
She would be a HELL of a lot better President then the POS you voted for and is going to be President in a day or two.
She has been fighting for equal rights for years and also for veterans rights and a better America.
 
Tbird19482 said:
She would be a HELL of a lot better President then the POS you voted for and is going to be President in a day or two.
She has been fighting for equal rights for years and also for veterans rights and a better America.
Click to expand...
I think I remember telling you that I didn't know too much about her But that I would watch to learn more about her... I did... I still have the ultimate respect for her as a veteran...at this time she's lost any vote that I may have considered in a political capacity... I can't support someone who doesn't use their own words and their own thoughts to personally attack others... And misrepresent the rights you mention...
 
I notice that nobody is listing the states that have approved this Amendment. Biden just said "I believe that it met the requirements" without regard to actually informing the folks what has changed to make it happen. So here it goes:

Anyway, this isn't hogwash...

Virginia ratified the Amendment on January 27th, 2020. They were the 38th state to ratify the Amendment.

So, according to my calculations that makes it 76% of the states have ratified the Equal Rights Amendment. That is what is required to make this official.

Here is a list of states that have (and have not) ratified the amendment and when they ratified the amendment.

Ratification By State — Equal Rights Amendment

www.equalrightsamendment.org www.equalrightsamendment.org

So, I'm not sure what it changes as every place that I know already have laws, etc. that guarantee this, but it seems it is also an Amendment to the US Constitution. So, "more guarantee" I guess.

So... Here it is our 28th Amendment:

“Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.”

Sounds a bit like it was written by Beaver on the TV Sitcom "Leave it to Beaver"...
 
Hawkeye10 said:
https://twitter.com/x/status/1880363481758875900

Clandestine
@WarClandestine

This “28th Amendment” stunt is not random.The brainwashed liberal sheep will eat this up and actually believe that this is part of The Constitution.Then when Trump rightfully says this is hogwash, the Dems will say Trump is “taking their rights away”.Pure desperation.


-------------------------------------

Do notice how you are taken for stupid.
Click to expand...
Are you opposed to the 28th Amendment?
 
Damocles said:
I notice that nobody is listing the states that have approved this Amendment. Biden just said "I believe that it met the requirements" without regard to actually informing the folks what has changed to make it happen. So here it goes:

Anyway, this isn't hogwash...

Virginia ratified the Amendment on January 27th, 2020. They were the 38th state to ratify the Amendment.

So, according to my calculations that makes it 76% of the states have ratified the Equal Rights Amendment. That is what is required to make this official.

Here is a list of states that have (and have not) ratified the amendment and when they ratified the amendment.

Ratification By State — Equal Rights Amendment

www.equalrightsamendment.org www.equalrightsamendment.org

So, I'm not sure what it changes as every place that I know already have laws, etc. that guarantee this, but it seems it is also an Amendment to the US Constitution. So, "more guarantee" I guess.

So... Here it is our 28th Amendment:

“Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.”

Sounds a bit like it was written by Beaver on the TV Sitcom "Leave it to Beaver"...
Click to expand...
Agreed, it is a redundant law. Unless the purpose it to require women to register for selective service.

The ERA was declared moot in 1982 when the scotus refused to hear a case requested by 4 States' wishing to rescind their votes, ... declared moot because it had already expired.
 
Bigdog said:
Agreed, it is a redundant law. Unless the purpose it to require women to register for selective service.

The ERA was declared moot in 1982 when the scotus refused to hear a case requested by 4 States' wishing to rescind their votes, ... declared moot because it had already expired.
Click to expand...
Since it grants all rights equally, then yeah. Women should have to register for Selective Service as the men cannot be treated differently by law "on account of sex"...

But the Amendment didn't have an expiration like ones written later or did it? https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/equal-rights-amendment-explained

No expiration is one of the reasons why one of the 12 Amendments introduced at the onset of the Constitution was able to be ratified while Bush (H.W. Bush not "Dubya") was President in 1992. Over 200 years after it was proposed the 27th Amendment making it so Congress could not give themselves raises that applied to a current term.

But yeah, after reading up on it more there were time limits set on it, and after those expired 5 total states have acted to rescind approval.
 
Last edited:
Damocles said:
Since it grants all rights equally, then yeah. Women should have to register for Selective Service as the men cannot be treated differently by law "on account of sex"...
Click to expand...

That's fair enough. But if Mr. Hegseth, who doesn't believe in women in military combat roles, wins his nomination, it won't happen. If women get drafted, wouldn't they have to perform the same roles as men draftees?
 
Damocles said:
Since it grants all rights equally, then yeah. Women should have to register for Selective Service as the men cannot be treated differently by law "on account of sex"...

But the Amendment didn't have an expiration like ones written later or did it? https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/equal-rights-amendment-explained

No expiration is one of the reasons why one of the 12 Amendments introduced at the onset of the Constitution was able to be ratified while Bush (H.W. Bush not "Dubya") was President in 1992. Over 200 years after it was proposed the 27th Amendment making it so Congress could not give themselves raises that applied to a current term.

But yeah, after reading up on it more there were time limits set on it, and after those expired 5 total states have acted to rescind approval.
Click to expand...
Actually, it was specified to expire in 1979 if not ratified. Then extended by 3 years to 1982. The 1982 expiration was affirmed by scotus when it refused to hear the case on rescinding State votes because the deadline had expired..
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
That's fair enough. But if Mr. Hegseth, who doesn't believe in women in military combat roles, wins his nomination, it won't happen. If women get drafted, wouldn't they have to perform the same roles as men draftees?
Click to expand...
If it was a matter of law, yes. However, if the ratification stands (not a done deal here, courts will have to work on this mess). Since it specifically talks about laws though, it may not apply to "policy". :dunno: Should they maintain that SecDef policies have the weight of "law" then he would not be able to set such restrictions on service. Though drafting women to take roles other than combat roles would not be out of place.
 
Bigdog said:
Actually, it was specified to expire in 1979 if not ratified. Then extended by 3 years to 1982. The 1982 expiration was affirmed by scotus when it refused to hear the case on rescinding State votes because the deadline had expired..
Click to expand...
Both of which are expired. Yeah. I'm pretty sure this isn't going to stick. Interesting.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
That's fair enough. But if Mr. Hegseth, who doesn't believe in women in military combat roles, wins his nomination, it won't happen. If women get drafted, wouldn't they have to perform the same roles as men draftees?
Click to expand...
Hegseth testified to congress that he supports women in combat. What he opposes is LOWRING STANDARDS so women can be in combat.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
That's fair enough. But if Mr. Hegseth, who doesn't believe in women in military combat roles, wins his nomination, it won't happen. If women get drafted, wouldn't they have to perform the same roles as men draftees?
Click to expand...
I think if they did draft people the second man drafted should file a discrimination law suite for not drafting women.
Drafting men only should now be considered discrimination .
 
Damocles said:
I notice that nobody is listing the states that have approved this Amendment. Biden just said "I believe that it met the requirements" without regard to actually informing the folks what has changed to make it happen. So here it goes:

Anyway, this isn't hogwash...

Virginia ratified the Amendment on January 27th, 2020. They were the 38th state to ratify the Amendment.

So, according to my calculations that makes it 76% of the states have ratified the Equal Rights Amendment. That is what is required to make this official.

Here is a list of states that have (and have not) ratified the amendment and when they ratified the amendment.

Ratification By State — Equal Rights Amendment

www.equalrightsamendment.org www.equalrightsamendment.org

So, I'm not sure what it changes as every place that I know already have laws, etc. that guarantee this, but it seems it is also an Amendment to the US Constitution. So, "more guarantee" I guess.

So... Here it is our 28th Amendment:

“Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.”

Sounds a bit like it was written by Beaver on the TV Sitcom "Leave it to Beaver"...
Click to expand...
The deadline imposed by Congress to ratify this, expired June 30th, 1982
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top