The 1st Amendment guarantees Free Speech!

Jarod

Well-known member
Contributor
“Ten days ago it took the Senate about twenty minutes to unanimously pass a bill extending security protection to the family members of Supreme Court justices when it looked like a house might be picketed.”

Florida made it illegal to protest in residential neighborhoods.


Mass murder at an elementary school - no action just prayers.
This lays at the feet of Republicans.
 
“Ten days ago it took the Senate about twenty minutes to unanimously pass a bill extending security protection to the family members of Supreme Court justices when it looked like a house might be picketed.”

Florida made it illegal to protest in residential neighborhoods.


Mass murder at an elementary school - no action just prayers.
This lays at the feet of Republicans.

Time to ban assault chalks.
 
“Ten days ago it took the Senate about twenty minutes to unanimously pass a bill extending security protection to the family members of Supreme Court justices when it looked like a house might be picketed.”

Florida made it illegal to protest in residential neighborhoods.


Mass murder at an elementary school - no action just prayers.
This lays at the feet of Republicans.

There is no right to harass and intimidate people at their homes you doxxing pig GFYS the shooting lays at the feet of the shooter you fucking piece of shit.
 
“Ten days ago it took the Senate about twenty minutes to unanimously pass a bill extending security protection to the family members of Supreme Court justices when it looked like a house might be picketed.”

Florida made it illegal to protest in residential neighborhoods.


Mass murder at an elementary school - no action just prayers.
This lays at the feet of Republicans.

Florida made it illegal to protest in residential neighborhoods.

And if you had two connected, functioning brain cells, you would see that this is a good idea.

Mass murder at an elementary school - no action just prayers.

What practical actions would you take that wouldn't infringe upon other rights?

This lays at the feet of Republicans.

And you assholes would politicize a ham sandwich if you thought it would enhance your political position.
 
“Ten days ago it took the Senate about twenty minutes to unanimously pass a bill extending security protection to the family members of Supreme Court justices when it looked like a house might be picketed.”

Florida made it illegal to protest in residential neighborhoods.

Mass murder at an elementary school - no action just prayers.
This lays at the feet of Republicans.
This is what happens when people keep voting for the lesser of two evils - they get evil.
 
And if you had two connected, functioning brain cells, you would see that this is a good idea.



What practical actions would you take that wouldn't infringe upon other rights?



And you assholes would politicize a ham sandwich if you thought it would enhance your political position.

Good idea or not, banning protests in neighborhoods infringes on 1st Amendment rights, sometimes doing so is the RIGHT THING TO DO. Allowing easy access for the mentally ill to AR-15's is not a "well regulated militia".

Without your ilk, those kids would have been sleeping in their beds last night, instead the beds were cold and empty, the kids dying, some slowly, without their parents.
 
Harassing and intimidating people are also crimes. Protesting is not a crime.

Yes it is, dummy...at the residences of Supreme Court Justices.

Title 18, Section 1507 of the U.S. Code, which was enacted in 1950. Under this law, it is illegal to picket or parade in front of a courthouse or a judge’s home "with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge."
 
No, we don't, dummy.

You absolutely do. You also cut funding for mental health programs and mental hospitals. But hey, federal income tax is the lowest ever. You save a few bucks.


"We don't need more gun control. We need to return to God," - MTG
 
Good idea or not, banning protests in neighborhoods infringes on 1st Amendment rights, sometimes doing so is the RIGHT THING TO DO. Allowing easy access for the mentally ill to AR-15's is not a "well regulated militia".

Without your ilk, those kids would have been sleeping in their beds last night, instead the beds were cold and empty, the kids dying, some slowly, without their parents.

Wrong.

Deinstitutionalization of People with Mental Illness - AMA ...
https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org › article › deinstitut...
by D Yohanna · 2013 · Cited by 87 — Deinstitutionalization as a policy for state hospitals began in the period of the civil rights movement when many groups were being incorporated


"Mainstreaming" mentally ill patients and releasing them into the streets was a liberal idea for which we are suffering today.

These liberals of your ilk have blood on your hands.
 
Wrong.

Deinstitutionalization of People with Mental Illness - AMA ...
https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org › article › deinstitut...
by D Yohanna · 2013 · Cited by 87 — Deinstitutionalization as a policy for state hospitals began in the period of the civil rights movement when many groups were being incorporated


"Mainstreaming" mentally ill patients and releasing them into the streets was a liberal idea for which we are suffering today.

These liberals of your ilk have blood on your hands.

"We don't need more gun control. We need to return to God," - MTG

Look into what Ronald Reagan did with the funding for mental hospitals and who was put out on the streets. I do not agree with such a policy. Deinstitutalization is one thing, releasing to the streets is quite another.

Live with your position scum.
 
You absolutely do. You also cut funding for mental health programs and mental hospitals. But hey, federal income tax is the lowest ever. You save a few bucks.


"We don't need more gun control. We need to return to God," - MTG

Wrong...there was no federal income tax before 1913.
 
Back
Top