Texas judge says ID laws harm latino voters

SmarterthanYou said:
oh hell no. YOU said that there are no unalienable rights, that they are ALL determined by congress and can be taken away by such. so what is it to be, moron?
Click to expand...

I think I had the order in which you take the remedial classes backwards. Take Reading 101 first, then Civics 101. Both, simultaneously, are too much for you.

I said there were no unalienable rights. I never said, stupid fuck, that Congress, by themselves, could alienate a right.

You use a common tactic that I see by the RW shitweasels on this forum. You restate a post in your own twisted words and then pursue that as if it were fact. Sorry, asswart, that won't fly with me.

Dismissed, pissant.
 
domer76 said:
I think I had the order in which you take the remedial classes backwards. Take Reading 101 first, then Civics 101. Both, simultaneously, are too much for you.

I said there were no unalienable rights. I never said, stupid fuck, that Congress, by themselves, could alienate a right.

You use a common tactic that I see by the RW shitweasels on this forum. You restate a post in your own twisted words and then pursue that as if it were fact. Sorry, asswart, that won't fly with me.

Dismissed, pissant.
Click to expand...

hey fucktard, YOU said that government alone determines what rights you have and what rights you do not. that they legislate them and and take them away. so maybe YOU should be the one to reconsider just what it is you believe.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
hey fucktard, YOU said that government alone determines what rights you have and what rights you do not. that they legislate them and and take them away. so maybe YOU should be the one to reconsider just what it is you believe.
Click to expand...

DEFINITELY, Reading 101 first.

What, EXACTLY, do you not understand about the amendment process?

What, EXACTLY, do you not understand about how laws are enacted?

I can describe them to you, just as I have done more than once. But I can't make you UNDERSTAND them, just as you have demonstrated more than once.

Dense motherfucker.
 
domer76 said:
DEFINITELY, Reading 101 first.

What, EXACTLY, do you not understand about the amendment process?

What, EXACTLY, do you not understand about how laws are enacted?

I can describe them to you, just as I have done more than once. But I can't make you UNDERSTAND them, just as you have demonstrated more than once.

Dense motherfucker.
Click to expand...

see, this is why you confuse everyone. can you not make the distinction between constitutional rights and rights as determined by the government? I ask this because you've still never answered the question about WHO WROTE THE CONSTITUTION?????? answer that question first, so at least I can determine whether or not I want to try to educate your dumbass.
 
I Love America said:
I will take your non answer as a yes.
Click to expand...

(laughing)

As usual, you fuck up a straightforward answer. What the fuck is wrong with your ability to read?

But, to simplify as much as I can for you, the answer is no. Just the opposite as your empty head thought.

Do you have people read and interpret these posts to you or do you fuck them up all by yourself?
 
domer76 said:
(laughing)

As usual, you fuck up a straightforward answer. What the fuck is wrong with your ability to read?

But, to simplify as much as I can for you, the answer is no. Just the opposite as your empty head thought.

Do you have people read and interpret these posts to you or do you fuck them up all by yourself?
Click to expand...

Well. Good we are getting somewhere. We should do everything we can to keep them from voting including ID

For some reason you lefties believe something as simple as getting a photo ID is onerous and impossible. Yet millions of people manage to pull it off.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
see, this is why you confuse everyone. can you not make the distinction between constitutional rights and rights as determined by the government? I ask this because you've still never answered the question about WHO WROTE THE CONSTITUTION?????? answer that question first, so at least I can determine whether or not I want to try to educate your dumbass.
Click to expand...

Damn! I can't make it much simpler for you. Did Mommy skip civics in home school? Are you that ignorant how laws and anendments work? I can't give you a rudimentary government class in a few posts if you're too stupid to understand.

Who wrote the Constitution? James Madison is credited with the framework. But here's how it works, shit-for-brains. It didn't become the law of the land because Madison said do or even if those attending the Constitutional Convention said so. It had to be presented to the states for ratification. As did the Bill of Rights. As do all amendments to the Constitution. What the fuck do you not understand about that process?

As to laws limiting such rights? Congress, or even states, can pass laws according to the legislative process. Those laws may or may not pass Constitutional muster. That's the purpose of one arm of the Constitutional triad, stupid fuck. To rule on the constitutionality of those laws.

How fucking stupid can you be to not understand simple civics? Sue Mommy or your backward school district for allowing you to pass Government 101, if you ever did. You obviously failed reading, but probably faked your way through.
 
domer76 said:
Who wrote the Constitution? James Madison is credited with the framework. But here's how it works, shit-for-brains. It didn't become the law of the land because Madison said do or even if those attending the Constitutional Convention said so. It had to be presented to the states for ratification. As did the Bill of Rights. As do all amendments to the Constitution. What the fuck do you not understand about that process?
Click to expand...
apparently a hell of a lot more than you do, because the states could not ratify anything without the consent of the people. It's why the preamble to the constitution starts with 'WE THE PEOPLE'

I'll continue to consider you an idiot on the supreme law of the land. you're welcome.
 
I Love America said:
Well. Good we are getting somewhere. We should do everything we can to keep them from voting including ID

For some reason you lefties believe something as simple as getting a photo ID is onerous and impossible. Yet millions of people manage to pull it off.
Click to expand...

Do you play dumb or really are dumb? The strict voter ID laws in states like Texas and other states are the result of CONSERVATIVE legislatures with one thing in mind. To reduce the vote of those who would tend to vote for the other party. It's so obvious that it's embarrassing that people like you don't recognize that. Or, that you're nothing more than the lying motherfuckers that would lead you to believe that.

Want voter ID? Great. Fund it for those that can't afford to purchase birth certificates. Get the IDs to them that can't travel. Allow student IDs in addition to hunting licenses.

But don't piss on our legs and tell us it's raining when you RW shitweasels claim voter fraud. That doesn't fly.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
apparently a hell of a lot more than you do, because the states could not ratify anything without the consent of the people. It's why the preamble to the constitution starts with 'WE THE PEOPLE'

I'll continue to consider you an idiot on the supreme law of the land. you're welcome.
Click to expand...

Yep. You really are that stupid.

The Constitution was submitted to the states, the PEOPLE, for ratification, you ignorant fuck. Article VII stipulated that nine states had to ratify the Constitution for it to go into effect. The conventions in each represented THE PEOPLE, stupid fucktard. Why is that so difficult for you to understand?

Whether you like it or not, simpleton, your representative IS the will of the people. That idiots like you would support the same shitfucks year after year is beyond me. You voted for "We the People", dumbshit. And now you have him, even though "We the People" rejected him by millions of votes.

Tske that shit pie and enjoy it, toadfucker.
 
Text Drivers are Killers said:
Why are poor people allowed to vote anyway.? Each state needs to pass a law that you can't vote if you've been a SNAPper anytime in the last 2 years.
Click to expand...

Two Wings of the Same Vulture

More proof that Preppy Progressives are agents of the Right Wing they were born in. One of the Right's attacks on democracy is that it ends up with people voting to freeload off the taxpayers. That's exactly the reason that the false-flag Postmodern Liberals enfranchised groups that would be likely to do that.
 
evince said:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...xas-voter-id-law-intentionally-hurt-hispanics



A federal judge ruled Texas lawmakers intentionally made it harder for poor Hispanic and blacks to vote when they passed the nation’s strictest photo ID law in 2011.
U.S. District Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos’s decision may put Texas back under federal supervision for all changes to its election policies, a step civil rights advocates are urging Ramos to take next.
Ramos previously rejected a joint request by Texas and the U.S. Justice Department -- which switched sides under the Trump administration -- to wait for the state’s Republican-controlled legislature to fix the law before making her decision.
The judge said waiting was pointless, as nothing the current legislature does or fails to do could change what lawmakers had in mind when they passed the voter ID law six years ago.
Texas’s law, one of several photo ID provisions passed by lawmakers in Republican-leaning states with the stated intention of combating alleged voter fraud, was declared illegally biased against minorities by a federal appeals court in July. Ramos was ordered to quickly tweak the law to let more voters participate in the November election while she considered more permanent fixes.
The appeals court also directed Ramos to re-examine evidence of the 2011 Legislature’s intention in passing the law. She found that Texas hadn’t proved lawmakers didn’t act with discriminatory intent.
Click to expand...

Are you saying that poor black and latinos can't do what poor whites can still do? Or is it that you could care less about the poor whites?
 
CFM said:
Are you saying that poor black and latinos can't do what poor whites can still do? Or is it that you could care less about the poor whites?
Click to expand...
I'd say she means both.
Typical. Racist against people of color due to bigotry and reverse racism against whites because it's PC.
 
domer76 said:
States don't have rights. People do. And the RW in this country has been trying to step on voting rights for a certain segment of the population for decades.
Click to expand...

I noticed that Desh mentioned poor blacks and latinos yet nothing about poor whites. I guess those strict voting laws don't affect them? Or is it that poor blacks and latinos can't do what then poor whites are capable of doing?
 
Micawber said:
Of course, for the shrinking party vote suppression is a campaign strategy, just the same as game compression by using the clock is in hoops, i.e. reduce possessions and increase statistical opportunity for victory. The fact that they do this is a glaring admission that they know they are a minority party and Dems are a natural majority. Why would the selfish haves favor a democracy? Of course they wouldn't. They will rationally use every means to reduce voter turnout. But I'm sounding too much like Chomsky.
Click to expand...

Seems nothing was mentioned about poor whites being negatively effected. Guess that means you either don't care that they are or they aren't and poor black/latinos simply can't do what whites can do.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top