Texas group creates white men only scholarship

Still no intelligent answer, huh...just the song and dance.



Well, I'll repeat it for the new pinhead....the question is NOT about being pc or WHY the organizations exist......the question is why the double standard is tolerated...

Do you want "separate but equal" to be the law of the land?...because thats what you're promoting, though one-sided....


Yo NOOB! I was kickin it on this site at its birth.... used to go back and forth with Damo before this existed! Funky Soul, my Brutha, Funky Soul
 
Hypothetically speaking, is there any white person reading this willing to trade, to be black so u could have what our country "gives" them and not to whites?

(willing to go out on a limb and assume there r no minority members thinking this is kosher)

That's a stupid question. Why does someone have to trade who they are racially to have what another person recieves from our government? The point being made is that Affirmative Action policy, which I submit had its proper place in history, now impedes true racial equality.
 
Whats even funnier, he don't even get it right the second time....:palm:
When I interviewed assholes like him, with their meaningless degrees, I politely told them to take a hike....It was amazing to see so many that were too stupid to know what they didn't know....no work ethic and just too immature for serious work. I'd take a GED with integrity and character first...:thup:

Well a degree in Underwater Basket-Weaving is an applied discipline, isn't it??? :whoa:
 
That's a stupid question. Why does someone have to trade who they are racially to have what another person recieves from our government? The point being made is that Affirmative Action policy, which I submit had its proper place in history, now impedes true racial equality.

Didn't think you'd have the fortitude to straight up answer the question put out there...why am I not surprised?
 
Hypothetically speaking, is there any white person reading this willing to trade, to be black so u could have what our country "gives" them and not to whites?

(willing to go out on a limb and assume there r no minority members thinking this is kosher)

Irrelevant strawman

Yo NOOB! I was kickin it on this site at its birth.... used to go back and forth with Damo before this existed! Funky Soul, my Brutha, Funky Soul


You misunderstood me...I meant new to the thread, not the site.....
 
Didn't think you'd have the fortitude to straight up answer the question put out there...why am I not surprised?

There is racial equality in the USA? I must have slept through it. It has greatly improved, but is isn't equal, quite yet. It is just my observation, being a white woman, I still observe racism towards the Native population in Alaska.
 
TC..you're good for a laugh all the time....a whole fuckin' essay that continues to tapdance around a simple question.

lets try it again ..

I don't care WHY an organization was founded, formed, or started....it ain't 1960, or 1970 or 1980 or 1990 AND ITS IRRELEVANT
...it is 2011....

Why today, is a black only organization not racist but a white only one is....

Lets not have anymore bullshit about 40 or 50 years ago .... lets talk about TODAY....as I've been trying to do since the beginning, and only getting bluster and bullshit in return...
if all you got is excuses about the past, crap about the Polish and Liberians or nonsense about legacy college entry (that isn't even race based) save us both some time and just STFU....

:palm: And if you wondered why I call Bravo intellectually impotent, folks, read the following and then read his above response:

http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showpost.php?p=782084&postcount=75

Evidently, Bravo is just too damned dumb to understand explanations beyond headline settings, so he just says they're "irrelevent".....Bravo can't logically explain why establishing a historical precedent for current actions or giving accurate definitions of the words being discussed is "irrelevent", but then again rational and logical debates have never been Bravo's strength.

So Bravo just toodles along, lying to himself and others in order to repeat his ignorant blatherings ad nauseum. But as always, the chronology of the posts will be his undoing.
 
Libby, why do so many back kids grow up without fathers? :(


Why?

Maybe because they're stuck in the "back" where their fathers can't see them?

The bigger question is why hasn't partisan hack disloyal corrected DY's spelling as she's so fond of doing?

Ohhhh right...it's because she's a sanctimonious gash and DY is one of the few males on the planet who will give her used up, cobweb encrusted muffin more than the usual disinterested glance.
 
:palm: And if you wondered why I call Bravo intellectually impotent, folks, read the following and then read his above response:

http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showpost.php?p=782084&postcount=75

Evidently, Bravo is just too damned dumb to understand explanations beyond headline settings, so he just says they're "irrelevent".....Bravo can't logically explain why establishing a historical precedent for current actions or giving accurate definitions of the words being discussed is "irrelevent", but then again rational and logical debates have never been Bravo's strength.

So Bravo just toodles along, lying to himself and others in order to repeat his ignorant blatherings ad nauseum. But as always, the chronology of the posts will be his undoing.

So you can't answer....thats what I thought....still blathering that I "can't logically explain why establishing a historical precedent for current actions or giving accurate definitions of the words being discussed is "irrelevent"...

haha....Why? because its irrelevant...thats why....

You're such a pathetic fool....its quite useless for me to keep asking the same question and you keep giving the same "non-responsive" answer ....

For the record, we all know that any race-based discrimination is bigotry and racism, no matter which race is the target, white or black or red, or yellow, Muslim or Christian....any other spin is bullshit and even though you're a bullshit artist, its still bullshit...in extreme denial...

The only thing we've actually confirmed is the fact that you're personally a bigot and racist.....if you were white, you'd be a Grand Puma or whatever the hell they have....
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
And if you wondered why I call Bravo intellectually impotent, folks, read the following and then read his above response:

http://www.justplainpolitics.com/sho...4&postcount=75

Evidently, Bravo is just too damned dumb to understand explanations beyond headline settings, so he just says they're "irrelevent".....Bravo can't logically explain why establishing a historical precedent for current actions or giving accurate definitions of the words being discussed is "irrelevent", but then again rational and logical debates have never been Bravo's strength.

So Bravo just toodles along, lying to himself and others in order to repeat his ignorant blatherings ad nauseum. But as always, the chronology of the posts will be his undoing.


So you can't answer....thats what I thought....still blathering that I "can't logically explain why establishing a historical precedent for current actions or giving accurate definitions of the words being discussed is "irrelevent"...

haha....Why? because its irrelevant...thats why....

You're such a pathetic fool....its quite useless for me to keep asking the same question and you keep giving the same "non-responsive" answer ....

For the record, we all know that any race-based discrimination is bigotry and racism, no matter which race is the target, white or black or red, or yellow, Muslim or Christian....any other spin is bullshit and even though you're a bullshit artist, its still bullshit...in extreme denial...

The only thing we've actually confirmed is the fact that you're personally a bigot and racist.....if you were white, you'd be a Grand Puma or whatever the hell they have....


And there you have it, folks....Bravo says it's irrelevent, and therefore it is....no logical explanation, no rational thought, no FACTS to support his assertion. I shudder to think of what the educational standards were during Bravo's formative years.

This is a standard pattern for Bravo and all intellectually challenged jokers like him....Bravo keeps trying to substitute his opinion, supposition and conjecture for facts and the logic derived from those facts. Essentially, it's a bigots convoluted logic that works in conjunction with a Bravo like insipid stubborness.

Post #73 and #75 on this thread tells the story folk.....let's watch Bravo continue to repeat ad nauseum his lame denial, lies, bluffs and dodges. "Bravo", indeed. :palm:
 
And there you have it, folks....Bravo says it's irrelevent, and therefore it is....no logical explanation, no rational thought, no FACTS to support his assertion. I shudder to think of what the educational standards were during Bravo's formative years.

This is a standard pattern for Bravo and all intellectually challenged jokers like him....Bravo keeps trying to substitute his opinion, supposition and conjecture for facts and the logic derived from those facts. Essentially, it's a bigots convoluted logic that works in conjunction with a Bravo like insipid stubborness.

Post #73 and #75 on this thread tells the story folk.....let's watch Bravo continue to repeat ad nauseum his lame denial, lies, bluffs and dodges. "Bravo", indeed. :palm:

"Folks"??
 
Post #73 and #75 on this thread tells the story folk.....let's watch Bravo continue to repeat ad nauseum his lame denial, lies, bluffs and dodges. "Bravo", indeed. :palm:
Those 2 post are quite telling and a good read if one can separate the wheat from the chaff, so to speak...
I ask very direct questions and get bluster and bullshit in return...thats what is most obvious..

I like this one though....(TC in blue)

Bravo stated: why is it not racist to have scholarships, beauty pageants, and numerous other for "blacks only" organizations .... but it is racist to have scholarships (and equivalent organizations) for "whites only"...


I replied: "Because at the time they were created, there was NO participation of black folk in the "main stream" in those mentioned areas.

Bravo stated: IRRELEVANT

And as one can see, pinheads answer really is irrelevant and nonresponsive....no one asked WHY they exist, only if they are racist...
They exist because of past discrimination...so what...

Blacks are well represented in the Miss American Pageant, Miss World, Miss Universe, etc..so why do we still have a racist pageant where only one race is represented....?

Blacks are well represented in colleges, even given "special" consideration above other applicants, not just whites but Asians too......so why is the racist "Negro College Fund" still tolerated...

We have the NAACP...."...for the Advancement of Colored People",
by their own admission thats means EVERYONE EXCEPT WHITES....
Racist ? No doubt about it....

Their are others and no counter, white or yellow or red
equivalent (race based) organizatons ....

Personally, none of them make a twit of difference in my life, nothing at all....but as an academic exercise, its a sensitive topic and brings out the best tapdancers on the board to spin, whine and show their pathetic bias and racism.

I replied: If you're white, it's "irrelevent" because YOU were not the one targeted for historical discrimination. One has to know history least one repeats it. I mentioned this to bring willfully ignorant bigots like Bravo up to speed.

Yeah, history is undeniable...but its still irrelevant to this issue...
Discrimination is a part of our history, absolutely....it would be great if it was truly a part of our past history....but assholes like TC continue it in the name of ....of....
of what....spite? to get even ? justice ?

in the name of history?....thats ridiculous...


And now folks....we'll get the old "chronology of the posts"
"forementioned buffoons", "intellectually impotent coward"
"willfully ignorant", "oathers" and the ever popular,
"birthers, tea partiers, and neocon toadies".........

but you'll hear no admission that "black only is racist"....instead you'll hear the charge that, "whites only is racist"


You're dismissed, Pinhead.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Post #73 and #75 on this thread tells the story folk.....let's watch Bravo continue to repeat ad nauseum his lame denial, lies, bluffs and dodges. "Bravo", indeed.

Those 2 post are quite telling and a good read if one can separate the wheat from the chaff, so to speak...
I ask very direct questions and get bluster and bullshit in return...thats what is most obvious..

I like this one though....(TC in blue)

Bravo stated: why is it not racist to have scholarships, beauty pageants, and numerous other for "blacks only" organizations .... but it is racist to have scholarships (and equivalent organizations) for "whites only"...


I replied: "Because at the time they were created, there was NO participation of black folk in the "main stream" in those mentioned areas.

Bravo stated: IRRELEVANT

And as one can see, pinheads answer really is irrelevant and nonresponsive....no one asked WHY they exist, only if they are racist...
They exist because of past discrimination...so what...

Blacks are well represented in the Miss American Pageant, Miss World, Miss Universe, etc..so why do we still have a racist pageant where only one race is represented....?

Blacks are well represented in colleges, even given "special" consideration above other applicants, not just whites but Asians too......so why is the racist "Negro College Fund" still tolerated...

We have the NAACP...."...for the Advancement of Colored People",
by their own admission thats means EVERYONE EXCEPT WHITES....
Racist ? No doubt about it....

Their are others and no counter, white or yellow or red
equivalent (race based) organizatons ....

Personally, none of them make a twit of difference in my life, nothing at all....but as an academic exercise, its a sensitive topic and brings out the best tapdancers on the board to spin, whine and show their pathetic bias and racism.

I replied: If you're white, it's "irrelevent" because YOU were not the one targeted for historical discrimination. One has to know history least one repeats it. I mentioned this to bring willfully ignorant bigots like Bravo up to speed.

Yeah, history is undeniable...but its still irrelevant to this issue...
Discrimination is a part of our history, absolutely....it would be great if it was truly a part of our past history....but assholes like TC continue it in the name of ....of....
of what....spite? to get even ? justice ?

in the name of history?....thats ridiculous...


And now folks....we'll get the old "chronology of the posts"
"forementioned buffoons", "intellectually impotent coward"
"willfully ignorant", "oathers" and the ever popular,
"birthers, tea partiers, and neocon toadies".........

but you'll hear no admission that "black only is racist"....instead you'll hear the charge that, "whites only is racist"


You're dismissed, Pinhead.


And there you have it folks, this Bravo dunce did EXACTLY as I said he would! Pity Bravo is just too damned dumb to realize it...Posts #73 & #75 (read in its entirety) seals Bravo's fate, and Bravo just keeps digging his own intellectually bankrupt and bigoted grave deeper with each predictable response. I leave the Bravo fool to his fate.
 
Back
Top