Texas brewery cancels anti-censorship rally featuring Kyle Rittenhouse:

The mods claim that they know who the socks are.

I'm barely willing to devote the time to this account. I can't imagine having another one wherein I waste even more time arguing with you idiots. Just curious who you and Dunce Uncle think I'm a sock of.
Jesus fucking Christ, you’re even dumber than I thought. That’s a bigger lie than the ones you’ve told about me on this thread. Care to pull your head out of your ass long enough to give a quote?

Well, Socksalot, I can see why you have so little time for this particular account.
 
:laugh: :rofl2: :laugh:

Remember when you where whining about others not having reading comprehension?
You just proved you don’t have any, Socksalot.

Damo a pussified sex slave who likes to have Rana’s strap on rammed up his ass daily.

You said the above, and since you are clearly a pussified sex slave who likes to have Rana’s strap on rammed up his ass daily, my question was valid.
 
You said the above, and since you are clearly a pussified sex slave who likes to have Rana’s strap on rammed up his ass daily, my question was valid.

QED. It’s sad you have such a poor opinion of Damo…and that you are stupid enough to not know that’s what you are posting.
 
QED. It’s sad you have such a poor opinion of Damo…and that you are stupid enough to not know that’s what you are posting.

I do have a poor opinion of you. Are you claiming to be Damo? That would be wild, considering he had to make new forum rule because of your cowardly cuckery.
 
I do have a poor opinion of you. Are you claiming to be Damo? That would be wild, considering he had to make new forum rule because of your cowardly cuckery.
I’m not Damo, Socksalot, but I can understand why a dumbass like you would assume I am.

Rule #16 should really be named after Legion, but Legion turned into such a big fucking pussy after his time out that Damo chose me instead. C’est la vie!
 
What’s the irony? It’s a business decision. Again, if it had been NAMBLA sponsoring the event and the brewery backed out, the RWNJs on JPP wouldn’t be screaming “Censorship!”

The 'irony' is that a business INITIALLY decided to sponsor a political event 'against censorship', but because they obviously got backlash from leftist morons who hate a kid that defended himself, that business decided that endorsing censorship was a better business decision.

Like I said, the irony was lost on a lot of morons, like yourself.
 
Learning to grift


Southern Star Brewing Company, a brewery in Conroe, Texas, will no longer host the "Rally Against Censorship" featuring Rittenhouse on Jan. 26, explaining its position Friday in a Twitter post.

"Southern star brewery is an apolitical organization. But we feel that this event doesn't reflect our own values and we could not in good faith continue to rent our space for the event on 1/26. We don't do rallies, we make beer for people who like beer," the brewery said.


https://www.yahoo.com/news/texas-brewery-cancels-anti-censorship-011033312.html

The kid is no hero. He's a killer and no one should idolize him. He's fortunate not to be in prison. He literally got away with murder.
 
The 'irony' is that a business INITIALLY decided to sponsor a political event 'against censorship', but because they obviously got backlash from leftist morons who hate a kid that defended himself, that business decided that endorsing censorship was a better business decision.

Like I said, the irony was lost on a lot of morons, like yourself.
Only fucking morons and wannabe terrorists think this is about Leftist morons. It’s about money. It’s TEXAS, dumbass. Get a fucking clue before you end up in prison.
 
In New America those the WOKE dont agree with are not allowed to speak.

We have regressed back to this shit.
Same with the Trumpers. Look at how many want to shut down, if not beat or murder, those with whom they disagree.
 
Would you have the same view if they’d rented the space to NAMBLA and put their name on the rally banner?

The brewery condoned the event and then changed their mind. IMO, it’s always “all about the money”. The brewery started seeing investors backing out and distribution contracts falling through. A small company like their’s can’t take a major hit so they quit.

They only scream about censorship when it fits their agenda.

To me, I think certain censorship is good, when it doesn’t come from the government.
 
They only scream about censorship when it fits their agenda.

To me, I think certain censorship is good, when it doesn’t come from the government.

Agreed they only whine when it fits their agenda. They are top notch hypocrites.

If it doesn’t come from the government, it’s not censorship. My airline had a strict policy against porn-in-the-cockpit. Pilots would cut out pictures and hide them in the cockpit for the entertainment of following crews. Once more women pilots became employed, the company took action against this out of self-preservation….to avoid sexual harassment lawsuits. Was that censorship? No, it wasn’t. It’s a business decision just like Southern Brewery’s decision to avoid a politically controversial event.

Any business that didn’t learn from previous companies mixing business and politics (e.g. Chik-fil-A) deserves what happens to them.

Again, that’s not censorship. It’s just good business.
 
The 'irony' is that a business INITIALLY decided to sponsor a political event 'against censorship',
And then the event added Shittenhouse.

The event lied in their initial agreement because they knew that Shittenhouse is a non starter.

I'm guessing that adding OJ...another murderer...would have gotten the same result.
 
I just read that Shittenhouse was added on Wednesday.

So it makes perfect sense.
It’s one thing to have a generic rally about censorship or freedom. It’s another to bring in controversial figures. Mixing business and politics is bad for business.
 
It’s one thing to have a generic rally about censorship or freedom. It’s another to bring in controversial figures. Mixing business and politics is bad for business.
Sounds to me like the brewery has plenty of space they use for events. I'm sure they need the revenue, so they agreed to allow the event to happen.

Once the organizers started to stack the card, it made sense to walk away from the revenue.

That's a no win situation for the brewery, but I believe there is less damage just cancelling the agreement.
 
Back
Top