Tethered to their rapists

christiefan915

Catalyst
And men wonder why women get angry. How about because the system is stacked against them?

"Chicago lawyer Shauna Prewitt wrote an opinion article for CNN.com detailing how she was raped in college and went on to not only have the resulting child, but fight laws allowing the fathers in these cases to seek "the same custody and visitation rights to their children that other fathers enjoy." The story comes after U.S. Rep. Todd Akin's controversial remarks about "legitimate rape" and abortion.

Shauna Prewitt was raped, and nine months later she gave birth to her rapists child. "You see, nine months after my rape, I gave birth to a beautiful little girl. You could say she was conceived in rape; she was. But she is also so much more than her beginnings. I blissfully believed that after I finally had decided to give birth to and to raise my daughter, life would be all roses and endless days at the playground. I was wrong again."

Prewitt's rapist then took her to court and she had to fight him in a custody battle. She learned while researching her case that 31 states do not have laws that prohibit racists from asserting custodial and visitation rights over a child he fathered through rape.

In other words, the rapist exerts control over his victim once again, using the baby produced from the attack as a bargaining chip. His offer, “I’ll leave you alone and let go of the custody thing as long as you don’t try to prosecute me for what I did,” is grotesque, but no doubt very effective. Prewitt says of this dynamic, “it is not surprising that a man who cruelly degrades a woman would also seek to torture her in an even more agonizing way, by seeking access to her child.”



http://www.nowpublic.com/world/men-who-father-through-rape-are-able-have-rights-child-2972549.html


Shawna's article in the Georgetown Law Journal: http://georgetownlawjournal.org/files/pdf/98-3/Prewitt.PDF
 
I see the Republicans are supporting Todd Akin again....
 
Of course they are...he's expressing their sincere beliefs. The OP is horrendous and yes men who rape will use anything to torture a woman they love that feeling of power over her. Pervs.
 
With the decision to have the child the woman should have determined to keep it to herself for the childs sake in my opinion. That isn't something I'd want to saddle a kid with. Maybe an abortion wasn't available to her because I can't imagine anything worse.
 
Don't conservatives want to take away a woman's choice when she's made pregnant by a rapist?
 
And men wonder why women get angry. How about because the system is stacked against them?

"Chicago lawyer Shauna Prewitt wrote an opinion article for CNN.com detailing how she was raped in college and went on to not only have the resulting child, but fight laws allowing the fathers in these cases to seek "the same custody and visitation rights to their children that other fathers enjoy." The story comes after U.S. Rep. Todd Akin's controversial remarks about "legitimate rape" and abortion.

Shauna Prewitt was raped, and nine months later she gave birth to her rapists child. "You see, nine months after my rape, I gave birth to a beautiful little girl. You could say she was conceived in rape; she was. But she is also so much more than her beginnings. I blissfully believed that after I finally had decided to give birth to and to raise my daughter, life would be all roses and endless days at the playground. I was wrong again."

Prewitt's rapist then took her to court and she had to fight him in a custody battle. She learned while researching her case that 31 states do not have laws that prohibit racists from asserting custodial and visitation rights over a child he fathered through rape.

In other words, the rapist exerts control over his victim once again, using the baby produced from the attack as a bargaining chip. His offer, “I’ll leave you alone and let go of the custody thing as long as you don’t try to prosecute me for what I did,” is grotesque, but no doubt very effective. Prewitt says of this dynamic, “it is not surprising that a man who cruelly degrades a woman would also seek to torture her in an even more agonizing way, by seeking access to her child.”



http://www.nowpublic.com/world/men-who-father-through-rape-are-able-have-rights-child-2972549.html


Shawna's article in the Georgetown Law Journal: http://georgetownlawjournal.org/files/pdf/98-3/Prewitt.PDF

I'm confused, I thought you wanted to assert that rape babies should be flushed, if the sperm provider(rapists aren't fathers) wants to raise the kid, isn't that a solution all round?
 
Don't conservatives want to take away a woman's choice when she's made pregnant by a rapist?
They want to take away all of womens choices and force them to have foreign objects inserted in their vaginas if they dare to claim their lawful rights. Rape is rape.
 
I'm confused, I thought you wanted to assert that rape babies should be flushed, if the sperm provider(rapists aren't fathers) wants to raise the kid, isn't that a solution all round?
You agree with Ryan "Rape is just another form of conception." Nothing to see there.... *spit*
 
I'm confused, I thought you wanted to assert that rape babies should be flushed, if the sperm provider(rapists aren't fathers) wants to raise the kid, isn't that a solution all round?

You are confused. I never came down on one side or the other about rape babies, except to support the woman's choice in the matter. Clearly Prewitt's rapist doesn't give a shit about the baby; he's using her as his trump card to get the charges dropped.
 
You are confused. I never came down on one side or the other about rape babies, except to support the woman's choice in the matter. Clearly Prewitt's rapist doesn't give a shit about the baby; he's using her as his trump card to get the charges dropped.
He is 50% of of the genetics, that does give him rights, though its as low as when one parent uses the kids as leverage against the other in a divorce(both genders do that I'm not casting aspersions)
 
Its to bad she desided to have the child,The lives of the childern of rape are generally hell.

While I'm all for a woman's right to choose, the above comment is horribly misguided and ignorant. One of my close friends was raped and gave birth to the rapist's baby. She's now a beautiful, happy little girl. Being pro-choice means the woman gets to decide...it's none of our damned business either way.
 
He is 50% of of the genetics, that does give him rights, though its as low as when one parent uses the kids as leverage against the other in a divorce(both genders do that I'm not casting aspersions)

Is that what happened in your family?

Annyway, if it is "legitimate rape", don't women's bodies refuse to get pregnant, or something?
 
And men wonder why women get angry. How about because the system is stacked against them?

"Chicago lawyer Shauna Prewitt wrote an opinion article for CNN.com detailing how she was raped in college and went on to not only have the resulting child, but fight laws allowing the fathers in these cases to seek "the same custody and visitation rights to their children that other fathers enjoy." The story comes after U.S. Rep. Todd Akin's controversial remarks about "legitimate rape" and abortion.

Shauna Prewitt was raped, and nine months later she gave birth to her rapists child. "You see, nine months after my rape, I gave birth to a beautiful little girl. You could say she was conceived in rape; she was. But she is also so much more than her beginnings. I blissfully believed that after I finally had decided to give birth to and to raise my daughter, life would be all roses and endless days at the playground. I was wrong again."

Prewitt's rapist then took her to court and she had to fight him in a custody battle. She learned while researching her case that 31 states do not have laws that prohibit racists from asserting custodial and visitation rights over a child he fathered through rape.

In other words, the rapist exerts control over his victim once again, using the baby produced from the attack as a bargaining chip. His offer, “I’ll leave you alone and let go of the custody thing as long as you don’t try to prosecute me for what I did,” is grotesque, but no doubt very effective. Prewitt says of this dynamic, “it is not surprising that a man who cruelly degrades a woman would also seek to torture her in an even more agonizing way, by seeking access to her child.”



http://www.nowpublic.com/world/men-who-father-through-rape-are-able-have-rights-child-2972549.html


Shawna's article in the Georgetown Law Journal: http://georgetownlawjournal.org/files/pdf/98-3/Prewitt.PDF

Did her rapist confess to the rape?

I would assume that if he came forward, then he would have to deal with that issue first.
 
Did her rapist confess to the rape? I would assume that if he came forward, then he would have to deal with that issue first.

What rape?

According to conservatives, the fact she got pregnant proves it wasn't "legitimate rape" doesn't it?

She wanted it, she was asking for it, right?
 
He is 50% of of the genetics, that does give him rights, though its as low as when one parent uses the kids as leverage against the other in a divorce(both genders do that I'm not casting aspersions)

The rapist has rights? When the sex was not consensual?

Thank you for illuminating yourself so clearly.
 
Back
Top