Terrible news for the Creation Science museum (and Republicans)

AProudLefty said:
Apparently they didn't get the memo.

w_SrL7.gif
Click to expand...

I hate when that happens.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Ringworld was cool.
Click to expand...

It does pose an interesting question about the nature of gravity. He compared it to being in an accelerating elevator. Assuming that there are no external forces (the elevator is accelerating in outer space), is the "force" real or artificial? What does that tell us about the nature of gravity?

So many questions. I think it is the reason why they cannot come up with UFT.
 
AProudLefty said:
It does pose an interesting question about the nature of gravity. He compared it to being in an accelerating elevator. Assuming that there are no external forces (the elevator is accelerating in outer space), is the "force" real or artificial? What does that tell us about the nature of gravity?

So many questions. I think it is the reason why they cannot come up with UFT.
Click to expand...

Gravity doesn't suck, it attracts.

Not a physicist, but my understanding is that the speed of light limit wasn't due to gravitational forces. Then again, aren't all those guys and gals looking for the Theory of Everything (ToE)? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_everything
 
Into the Night said:
If natural selection is in force at all times, how do you get variety in the first place??
Click to expand...

Imperfect replication process, different choices.

Consider Justice Louis Brandeis's comment about states being laboratories of democracy. Some things work, others fail. Evolution in action.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
My guess is no more than you can with a chimp. What's the answer and why?

Why are you limiting God to a book written by a desert nomad 4000 years ago?
Click to expand...

God has nothing to do with this.

If a Homo erectus and Homo sapiens [I consider the second sapiens to be redundant] could mate and produce fertile offspring then they aren’t separate species; it then follows, that Homo erectus wasn’t a transitional form. Inter-fertility is the only true test of that theory.

That you can’t answer the question only means you believe they are/were separate species because someone told you that. It could easily be true they are the same species and that Homo erectus is an artificial taxonomic category that only serves to ‘prove’ human evolution.
 
Darth Omar said:
God has nothing to do with this.

If a Homo erectus and Homo sapiens [I consider the second sapiens to be redundant] could mate and produce fertile offspring then they aren’t separate species; it then follows, that Homo erectus wasn’t a transitional form. Inter-fertility is the only true test of that theory.

That you can’t answer the question only means you believe they are/were separate species because someone told you that. It could easily be true they are the same species and that Homo erectus is an artificial taxonomic category that only serves to ‘prove’ human evolution.
Click to expand...
Dude, you just proved you're willfully ignorant.

As the wise Texan Ron White once said, "Let me tell you something folks; you can't fix stupid. There is not a pill you can take. There's not a class you can go to. Stupid is forevah!"

 
Dutch Uncle said:
Dude, you just proved you're willfully ignorant.

As the wise Texan Ron White once said, "Let me tell you something folks; you can't fix stupid. There is not a pill you can take. There's not a class you can go to. Stupid is forevah!"

Click to expand...

Didn’t like the question lol?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top