Terrible news for the Creation Science museum (and Republicans)

Self-awareness is thinking "What will I have for dinner?" not "hungry. find food." A dog does not think about that asshole dog, Bob, down the street who is always shitting on his master's lawn. A dog does immediately react to the sight of Bob with anger.

A dog is pure zen. It lives each moment to moment but it's not self-aware. It simply lives the moment. If it's hungry it wants to eat. If cold it wants to be warm. It doesn't plan for winter or summer.

Yet a dog learns. It can learn about things like snow, who it's owner is, it's own name, it's favorite food, etc. A dog has no religion. It is not a Buddhist.
 
Yet a dog learns. It can learn about things like snow, who it's owner is, it's own name, it's favorite food, etc. A dog has no religion. It is not a Buddhist.

A Furby can learn.

7b3e3386ca9442356bf1849a0276a2c4.gif
 
I theorized that one reason the numbers for Republicans changed was due to the Republican party shrinking, leaving only the nutjobs behind, but I haven't been able to back up that theory with available evidence.

Example:
https://news.gallup.com/poll/15370/party-affiliation.aspx

Republicans Independents Democrats

2021 May 3-18 29 35 33
2013 Dec 5-8 24 44 30
2009 Dec 11-13 29 36 33

Probably because you are searching propaganda for the evidence.
 
My dog is a secular canine-ist herself, but she begrudging tolerates her family's secular humanism.
We might be able to get along better if we try harder,
but really,
who's counting on that?
 
I also think these days it is widely considered a mark of ignorance to deny evolution by natural selection.
Not adhering to your religion does not make one ignorant. Circular argument fallacy (fundamentalism).
25 years ago, a bible thumper could sort of get away with a strictly creation science posture.
The Theory of Creation is not a theory of science.
These days, a creation scientist is laughed out of the room.
The Theory of Creation is not a theory of science. There is no 'creation science'.
You can even see bible thumpers on this thead grudgingly accept the tenets of evolution, while still trying to inject providential design into it
The Theory of Evolution is not a theory of science. There is no 'evolution science'.
 
The language of science is neccessary to communicate and research relevant scientific topics.
Science is not a language. You are not discussing science. Religion is not science. The Theory of Abiogenesis is not a theory of science. There is no 'abiogenesis science'.
If you find yourself confused and befuddled by terms like cyanobacteria and prokaryotes, it's time for you to gracefully bow out of any serious discussion of abiogenesis and biological emergence.
Buzzword fallacies.
 
According to the data, is it safe to call the Republican Party the Party of Ignorance...with Trump as the King of Stupidity? ;)


Note that the percentage of Republicans who believe the Earth is 6000 years old, just as the Bible says, is also approximately the same number refusing vaccines.

Making up numbers again?
You don't get to speak for everyone. You only get to speak for yourself.
 
Nothing limits God in the Bible. Why do you think it does?

Try reading it again slowly but drop your prejudices. People who take the Bible literally are limiting God to the Bible. The Bible itself tells a story. It's not limiting God, the people taking it literally are doing so.
 
Agreed. Most cultures have creation stories be it turtles, buffalo or anything else. Likewise, only the ignorant in those cultures believe the stories over scientific evidence.

Science isn't evidence. Science is a set of falsifiable theories. There is no such thing as 'scientific evidence'.
 
Yet a dog learns. It can learn about things like snow, who it's owner is, it's own name, it's favorite food, etc.

I work with my dog all the time. However, he's not self-aware even when he learns a new trick or doesn't like doing certain things. It's all a matter of conditioning because...wait for it....he's not self-aware. A dog can reason, but that's not the same.

Example, the old Dog, a chain, a tree and a bowl of water test as pictured below. Some dogs are smarter than others and can reason out the problem quicker than others. Some are so stupid or emotionally wrought that they spin themselves around the tree until they choke. Some can be trained to learn the solution, some aren't as trainable. None of them are self-aware.

01AjAuO.jpg
 
Making up numbers again?
You don't get to speak for everyone. You only get to speak for yourself.

No. Your paranoia acting up again?

Agreed, but 6000 is a common number used by Fundie Christians. I've posted the link before. Look it up yourself instead of being wacky.
 
Back
Top