TENURED professor fired for saying Sandy Hook staged by govt

Mr.Badguy said:
We wont know until if/when the rest of the names are released, but even still, Cotton put a lot of effort into the letter and trying to convince others to follow suit. Your argument of -he wasnt the only one- just makes you look like you're trying to excuse 47 republican senators of kowtowing to the whims of a foreign nation bent on war with Iran.
Click to expand...

Low IQ dolts, as evidenced by the followers of crap "journalists" like seymour hersh's multitude of false claims that Israel was "going to attack iran any day now", love to spout lots of lies and nonsense.

That I am actually on the same side as the astoundingly stupid poster "evince" should convince everyone that there was no false flag/hoax incident here, its just trolling internet teens stirring the pot.
 
transwarpdrive said:
What idiot believes 9/11 was an inside job? No sane adult over 3 that I've ever met does.
Click to expand...

Everyone believes it. It's been 14 years and everyone by now knows about Bldg 7. Even you do, though the govt pays you to support the ridiculous conspiracy theory about cave-dwelling arabs defeating the american air force.
 
Too bad BAC doesn't post here anymore. He and Text Drivers are Killers would be an interesting mix.
 
Text Drivers are Killers said:
Everyone believes it. It's been 14 years and everyone by now knows about Bldg 7. Even you do, though the govt pays you to support the ridiculous conspiracy theory about cave-dwelling arabs defeating the american air force.
Click to expand...

LOL, tell me some more bedtime stories...tell us what happened to Bldg 7, tell me more BS so I can laugh in your face and the face of every fucking worthless asshole claiming such nonsense. I WAS THERE, AND SAW BOTH PLANES HIT FROM RIGHT NEXT DOOR, so don't fucking tell me what was what.

So many losers in this world trying to make themselves seem important, as if they have some kind of special "inside information" that they conjured or pulled off the web.

The attacks happened right in front of me, and I worked in Bldg 7 as did many other people I knew. You insult the memory of the dead and disrespect those who were injured trying to save people with your nauseating, childish, conspiracy theory ramblings.
 
Text Drivers are Killers said:
I gave you the link to the FBI site that says sandy hook never happened. Next question.
Click to expand...

How does what the FBI shows or not shows prove that that event was a government hoax? On mornings that you wake up when its cloudy, do you scream that the sun was stolen by martians? Do you realize how stupid you sound?

Even a cursory search of the web found this site debunking your nonsense:

http://www.middletheory.com/fbi-reports-zero-murders-at-sandy-hook-not-so-fast/
 
Text Drivers are Killers said:
Yes - snopes says it's a "statistical anomaly"!!! HAHAHA. What a bunch of crap. Snopes is a govt tool.
Click to expand...

snopes.png
 
wouldn't surprise me at all if the gov were behind these attacks. False flags are real. The government wants to subjugate us. The dems pretty much cream their pants everytime there is a 'mass shooting' where 2 people die.
 
transwarpdrive said:
LOL, tell me some more bedtime stories...tell us what happened to Bldg 7, tell me more BS so I can laugh in your face and the face of every fucking worthless asshole claiming such nonsense. I WAS THERE, AND SAW BOTH PLANES HIT FROM RIGHT NEXT DOOR, so don't fucking tell me what was what.
.
Click to expand...


HAHAHA. You don't even understand the issue. NO PLANE hit bldg 7, you ignorant jackass. And it was on a separate block from the twin towers that were hit by planes. So why did 7 undergo unitary collapse at near free fall speed?. What could have possibly caused that except explosives. THINK
 
transwarpdrive said:
How does what the FBI shows or not shows prove that that event was a government hoax? On mornings that you wake up when its cloudy, do you scream that the sun was stolen by martians? Do you realize how stupid you sound?

Even a cursory search of the web found this site debunking your nonsense:

http://www.middletheory.com/fbi-reports-zero-murders-at-sandy-hook-not-so-fast/
Click to expand...


I know what snopes says. They say it was a "statistical anomaly" and that's it. HAHAHA
 
Text Drivers are Killers said:
HAHAHA. You don't even understand the issue. NO PLANE hit bldg 7, you ignorant jackass. And it was on a separate block from the twin towers that were hit by planes. So why did 7 undergo unitary collapse at near free fall speed?. What could have possibly caused that except explosives. THINK
Click to expand...

Asshole, I didn't claim that it was hit by a plane. It was struck by massive amounts of debris as it was right across the street. Idiots like you seem to believe you have some special "insider" information; you do not. There was no physical way that:

1-in a building with dozens of maintenance workers, thousands of regular workers, that "some government operatives" could have slipped the huge amounts of explosives to collapse the building and not be seen

2-that the hundreds, if not thousands, of people in the gov't who would have been involved not spoken to anyone about it - or been willing to mass murder thousands of civilians

3-there was no loud explosive sounds as would have been the case in a controlled demo - I was there fuckhead when the buildings when down.

The 9/11 truther is the lowest form of jackass moron that exists, after arab muslims of course. It is the age of the internet, where low IQ trash like you can try to increase their non-existent importance to pretend they are something they are not - useful.
 
It's entertaining how a bunch of clowns pretend to be civil engineers when discussing the WTC. Don't ever forget, though, that they moved the goalposts. Back in late 2001 through 2002, they were arguing that planes couldn't bring down the twin towers. Now they just talk about Building 7, because, why not? Frankly, I'm surprised they weren't committed enough to just keep hammering home about jet fuel and the design of the Twin Towers...
 
Threedee said:
It's entertaining how a bunch of clowns pretend to be civil engineers when discussing the WTC. Don't ever forget, though, that they moved the goalposts. Back in late 2001 through 2002, they were arguing that planes couldn't bring down the twin towers. Now they just talk about Building 7, because, why not? Frankly, I'm surprised they weren't committed enough to just keep hammering home about jet fuel and the design of the Twin Towers...
Click to expand...

To be clear, even the twin towers' building engineers and designers never claimed that a modern 747 wouldnt be able to bring them down. IIRC, one of the engineers said they had taken into account a smaller plane, like a 707 or DC10, but they did not think it would be cost effective to build against such a scenario as the jet would be so large and carry so much fuel it probably would not have been possible.

TBH, I don't think ANY modern building, even ones put up in the last few years, would be able to withstand a direct strike from a fully-fueled 747; the plane's force and speed is too great, and the fuel carry is immense.
 
transwarpdrive said:
To be clear, even the twin towers' building engineers and designers never claimed that a modern 747 wouldnt be able to bring them down. IIRC, one of the engineers said they had taken into account a smaller plane, like a 707 or DC10, but they did not think it would be cost effective to build against such a scenario as the jet would be so large and carry so much fuel it probably would not have been possible.

TBH, I don't think ANY modern building, even ones put up in the last few years, would be able to withstand a direct strike from a fully-fueled 747; the plane's force and speed is too great, and the fuel carry is immense.
Click to expand...

Hey einstein. Bldg 7 was NOT hit by a plane.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top