TED CRUZ TO REPUBLICANS: LIMIT VOTING AT ALL COSTS, THE FEAR OF ELIGIBLE VOTERS

blackascoal

The Force is With Me
Voting is an evil that republicans fear most. Eligible voters must be stopped at all costs.

With the failure to produce any credible evidence of massive voter fraud, republicans now shift to demanding that voting be curtailed and limited. All bets are off as republicans now know just how unpopular they and their agenda is with the American people, so why not just steal elections up front by selectively cutting off large segments of the population from voting at all. Cheat at all costs

CRUZ TO REPUBLICANS, LIMIT VOTING AT ALL COSTS
huffingtonpost.com

... and they have introduced 165 pieces of garbage legislation on state levels to attempt to do just that.
 
Voting is an evil that republicans fear most. Eligible voters must be stopped at all costs.

With the failure to produce any credible evidence of massive voter fraud, republicans now shift to demanding that voting be curtailed and limited. All bets are off as republicans now know just how unpopular they and their agenda is with the American people, so why not just steal elections up front by selectively cutting off large segments of the population from voting at all. Cheat at all costs

CRUZ TO REPUBLICANS, LIMIT VOTING AT ALL COSTS
huffingtonpost.com

... and they have introduced 165 pieces of garbage legislation on state levels to attempt to do just that.
They are so afraid. These are the actions of cowards.
 
Cancun Raffy isn't stupid like most trumpanzeess.
He's actually pretty intelligent.

He is completely crazy, however, and in the most vile sort of way.
There's a humane answer for devolved mutants like Cancun Raffy.

The first injection anesthetizes him so he feels no discomfort.
The second injection stops his breathing and circulation.
I don't believe in punishing the criminally insane.
Just nicely say goodbye as we'd do with a sick pet, even though Cancun Raffy doesn't really deserve that kindness.
We offer it because we're good, even if he isn't.
 
CRUZ TO REPUBLICANS, LIMIT VOTING AT ALL COSTS

A political party whose main political strategy is limiting voting is a weak political party. Some days it seems like the only thing Republicans have is trying to make it difficult for voters to vote.
 
IT WASN'T THE GOP WHO SHREDDED THE CONSTITUTION TO ALLOW ILLEGAL MAIL-IN BALLOTS TO WIN THE ELECTION, WAS IT?
 
A political party whose main political strategy is limiting voting is a weak political party. Some days it seems like the only thing Republicans have is trying to make it difficult for voters to vote.

It’s all they have left. Now they’re in panic mode.

It speaks to the awareness of the power of coalitions of Americans voting and the unity of purpose. The only counter republicans have for that unity is to attack democracy.
 
It’s all they have left. Now they’re in panic mode.

It speaks to the awareness of the power of coalitions of Americans voting and the unity of purpose. The only counter republicans have for that unity is to attack democracy.

Everyone is entering a scary phase. Republicans are scared they will lose power to democracy, and the rest are scared we will lose democracy to Republicans.
 
Voter suppression has long been a Repub tactic. It has served them well. As their share of the voters drops, the suppression will go up. Picking voters has been the Repub way since Weyrich in the 1980s. The fact that the reds are trying to install hundreds of voter suppression acts should tell you they read the tea leaves.
 
Voter suppression has long been a Repub tactic. It has served them well. As their share of the voters drops, the suppression will go up. Picking voters has been the Repub way since Weyrich in the 1980s. The fact that the reds are trying to install hundreds of voter suppression acts should tell you they read the tea leaves.

VERIFYING AND IDENTIFYING LEGAL VOTERS IS "VOTER SUPPRESSION"...HOW, EXACTLY?
 
IT WASN'T THE GOP WHO SHREDDED THE CONSTITUTION TO ALLOW ILLEGAL MAIL-IN BALLOTS TO WIN THE ELECTION, WAS IT?


I know FACTS are messy things to an idiot like you, but nobody gives a fuck about you.

US SUPREME COURT DEALS SETBACK TO REPUBLICANS ON MAIL-IN VOTING IN KEY STATES
theguardian.com

Who is a better judge of the legality of the Constitution, the Supreme Court, or YOU ? :corn:
 
VERIFYING AND IDENTIFYING LEGAL VOTERS IS "VOTER SUPPRESSION"...HOW, EXACTLY?
You show ID when register to vote. I had to show it, perhaps you did not. They give to a voter ID card Then they assign you to a precinct . Then they put your name in a precinct voter book. When you get to the polls, to have to sign an application sheet. They check your signature comparing it to the one in the book.
THAT IS EXACTLY A BUNCH OF VOTER VERIFICATION. Can you not understand that?
In order to vote for someone else, you would have to know what precinct they are assigned. Then you would have to know how they signed the application. You would have to get it past the signature comparisons. That is done by computer matching nowadays.
So there are not millions of votes coming in from China or Russia, When your vote is accepted,your name is marked off in the book. If there are a bunch of votes for the same name, don,t you think the system would catch it? Obviously, it would. That is why our system has proven to be so safe, over and over.
 
I know FACTS are messy things to an idiot like you, but nobody gives a fuck about you.

US SUPREME COURT DEALS SETBACK TO REPUBLICANS ON MAIL-IN VOTING IN KEY STATES
theguardian.com

Who is a better judge of the legality of the Constitution, the Supreme Court, or YOU ? :corn:

THE FACT IS THAT ARTICLE II WAS GLARINGLY VIOLATED, OR CAN'T YOU READ, MORON?

THE SCOTUS NEVER RULED ON THE ILLEGAL ELECTION LAW CHANGES, DUMBFUCK.








"....Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, ...."



NOT THE GOVERNOR, NOT THE ELECTION BOARD, NOT THE SECRETARIES OF STATE ,NOT THE COURTS....
 
Last edited:
You show ID when register to vote. I had to show it, perhaps you did not. They give to a voter ID card Then they assign you to a precinct . Then they put your name in a precinct voter book. When you get to the polls, to have to sign an application sheet. They check your signature comparing it to the one in the book.
THAT IS EXACTLY A BUNCH OF VOTER VERIFICATION. Can you not understand that?
In order to vote for someone else, you would have to know what precinct they are assigned. Then you would have to know how they signed the application. You would have to get it past the signature comparisons. That is done by computer matching nowadays.
So there are not millions of votes coming in from China or Russia, When your vote is accepted,your name is marked off in the book. If there are a bunch of votes for the same name, don,t you think the system would catch it? Obviously, it would. That is why our system has proven to be so safe, over and over.

OH...SO YOU'RE BACK TO "BLACKS ARE TOO STUPID TO GET IDs" AGAIN?
 
OH...SO YOU'RE BACK TO "BLACKS ARE TOO STUPID TO GET IDs" AGAIN?

Are you well? The message, which must be way beyond your ability to understand is we have a very safe system. It has been checked over and over and voter fraud is extremely rare. That is a fact. None of what you said is. The system works.
Do you have a voters card? Can you read it?
That was one of the worst responses to a thread....ever.
 
Are you well? The message, which must be way beyond your ability to understand is we have a very safe system. It has been checked over and over and voter fraud is extremely rare. That is a fact. None of what you said is. The system works.
Do you have a voters card? Can you read it?
That was one of the worst responses to a thread....ever.

IRRELEVANT TO THE NEED FOR VOTER ID, AMID THE MILLIONS OF UNVETTED, UNVERIFIED "MAIL IN BALLOTS" ALLOWED IN 2020..
 
Back
Top