Teachers & Guns? Seriously?

Eagle Eye said:
I know a hell of a lot more about the hood than you know about being in a gun fight. You have seen way to many Hollywood gun fights. People don't stand still and blaze away at each other. So all of your arguments are BS. How many guns have you ever owned or shot?
Click to expand...

How many shoot outs in a HS have you been in dipshit!
 
dB2UIRj.png
 
Darth Omar said:
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
See chuckles, no one is laughing at the FACT that assault rifles have been used in the increasing frequency of mass shootings. Take those out of the equation, and you lessen the problem. Arming civilians like the old Wild West is a nasty shootout with stray bullet victims waiting to happen. the country is rift with "gun free zones", genius...so according to you the death toll via criminal/crazy acts should be through the roof. Yet it isn't.

If you can't protect yourself with the plethora of weapons that are NOT on the AWB of 1994 list, then you're just a lousy shot....or a paranoid fool.
Click to expand...
The psychos can use weapons on the same list to commit mass murder.

Reducing clip size just means they have to change clips more often. And guess what? Since the shooter is the only one with a gun, he doesn’t need to rush.

If the shooter encounters an armed teacher and has to stop and change clips, he’s screwed, isn’t he.

If he turns his back on an armed teacher, he’s screwed. If the shooter comes through the door of a class room and a teacher was instructed to keep their weapon trained on the doorway, he’s screwed again.

It’s not that your idea is a bad one—-it’s more like incomplete. But all liberals know to do is to grab the guns.
Click to expand...

Ahhh, but notice what weapons are being chosen when available. Why do you think that is, bunky? Could it possibly be because those weapons are assault rifles, DESIGNED to make mass shootings like we've seen more efficient for the shooter?

IF the shooter comes across an armed teacher and doesn't blow him away, and IF the teacher is a good marksman with experience under such pressure and IF the teacher has a clear shot IF all the screaming kids running for their lives are out the way, then MAYBE this stupid ass gunner wet dream of yours comes true.

But seriously, don't you feel like a fucking fool creating all these scenarios in order to justify the profit margins of the gun manufacturers and salesmen and the insipidly stubborn paranoia of some right wing gun owning flunkies & dupes? I mean, you didn't even have the cojones to deal with the fact based logic of my previous post.

Oh, and for the record, the AWB did not "grab guns" of those previously owned before the law went into effect. Just thought you should know. Carry on.
 
Darth Omar said:
Logic is having a final barrier in place for when the laws fail to protect the innocent.

No amount of laws are going to stop a determined shooter. So, logic becomes having some sort of armed presence to protect kids in the event there’s a failure in the system.

More often than not, the psychos are stopped by someone with a gun.
Click to expand...

If according to you no amount of laws or armed guards or cops are going to stop a determined shooter, then how on God's green earth are you so damned sure some strapped teacher WHO HAS NEVER BEEN IN A SHOOT OUT OR COMBAT SITUATION is going to?
 
SmarterthanYou said:
listen up, toddler. you never get much of anything right since you can't seem to remember that I do not like the NRA and i'm not right wing, but Libertarian. I know those things don't mean much difference to you, but that's your intellectual issue, not mine.
Click to expand...

And as I've said many times before, Libertarians are a fucking joke......consummate liars like you, who swear that he's not a part of any group or adheres to any rhetoric or listens/reads to any news source that spouts the very right wingnut rhetoric you are doing here....trying to hide it behind some Oather/Threeper BS. Go home and play with your gun, boy...you're not fooling anyone.
 
Taichiliberal said:
If according to you no amount of laws or armed guards or cops are going to stop a determined shooter, then how on God's green earth are you so damned sure some strapped teacher WHO HAS NEVER BEEN IN A SHOOT OUT OR COMBAT SITUATION is going to?
Click to expand...

The average cop or armed guard HAS NEVER BEEN IN A SHOOT OUT OR COMBAT SITUATION.
Just wanted to point that out. ;)
 
SmarterthanYou said:
right, because Rune is such an alt-righter ROFL.

seriously, some of you low information fucks are a riot
Click to expand...

Who is Rune? I talking about YOU, you braying libertarian jackass....blathering some oather/threeper BS and denying any similarities to the right wingnut garbage others spew. Go home and play with your gun, boy...you ain't fooling anyone but yourself.
 
Sirthinksalot said:
It's not magic, maybe if the teacher's union stopped taking so much of teacher's salaries to use to support Democrats there'd be more money for security in schools.
The blood of children is on your hands if you don't want to pay for security.
Click to expand...

And yet another supremely ignorant statement from another intellectually impotent right wing wonk. Do some research to see EXACTLY what are the dues required for the union...then check into the FACT that the budget for school supplies and materials are based on CITY AND STATE allocations, NOT teacher's salaries.

God, you are fucking stupid...whether this is willful or not on your part is irrelevant. I'm done with you.
 
Sirthinksalot said:
The average cop or armed guard HAS NEVER BEEN IN A SHOOT OUT OR COMBAT SITUATION.
Just wanted to point that out. ;)
Click to expand...

No shit Sherlock....but since YOU and your fellow yahoos are NOT advocating that these armed teachers go the full academy training regarding handling weapons in confronting criminals or in a riot situation, your analogy and suggestions fall flat.

Dummies like you don't think things through...and are a waste of time. Adios.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top