Tea Party plans "insanity"

Cancel8

Canceled
..."Obama's top economic advisor, Austan Goolsbee, warned today against "playing chicken" with raising the country's debt ceiling...

"I don't see why anybody's talking about playing chicken with the debt ceiling," Goolsbee said. "If we get to the point where you've damaged the full faith and credit of the United States, that would be the first default in history caused purely by insanity..."

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/gool...g-chicken-debt-ceiling-vote/story?id=12522970


"...Appearing on “Face the Nation” Sunday, Rep. Michele Bachmann squared off with outspoken Democratic Rep. Anthony Weiner of New York about how to tackle the debt ceiling, foreshadowing what's poised to be a major fight early in 2011.


Bachmann told the CBS audience that the country's debt ceiling should not be raised again..."

http://www.startribune.com/politics...7K_0c::D3aDhUiD3aPc:_Yyc:aUvca_bPiL_ec7PaP3iU
 
so mojo creates the thread title "tea party plans insanity"

then thanks DY for saying its obama's plan that is insane

neither of his links have that thread title, therefore, mojo actually made an opinion instead of just cut and paste from the internet or merely give a link....so his opinion is that tea party plans are "insane"....but yet he thanks DY....

trollin, trollin, trolling? do explain mojo....
 
Tea parties are for little girls!

Tea parties are for little girls!

princess+tea.jpg
 
so mojo creates the thread title "tea party plans insanity"

then thanks DY for saying its obama's plan that is insane

neither of his links have that thread title, therefore, mojo actually made an opinion instead of just cut and paste from the internet or merely give a link....so his opinion is that tea party plans are "insane"....but yet he thanks DY....

trollin, trollin, trolling? do explain mojo....
Actually, Mojo points out where, in his first link, where a person calls the idea of not raising the debt ceiling "insanity". You can find it if you actually read instead of assuming.

Mojo's 2nd link shows that it is TEA party representative-elect that is calling for voting down raising the debt ceiling.

Hence, the Obama administration is who calls the TEA party "insane" for their stance that the debt ceiling should not be raised.

That Mojo seems to disagree with that analysis he does not make clear, but I imply it from his support of Damn Yankee's post. Additional clue, Mojo puts the word "insanity" in quotes.

Aside to Mojo: how DO you stand on this issue? It still seems strange to me you post so much without any indication where you actually stand on issues.
 
Last edited:
"Republicans in the new Congress, with control of the House and larger numbers in the Senate, promise to use their power to focus most intensely on ways to cut spending in a time of giant budget deficits. But their influence will change the terms of Washington's debate on a range of other major issues as well:

• Health care: Republicans plan an early House vote on legislation to repeal President Barack Obama's health-care law, but they concede that has little chance of passing the Senate. They will follow up with targeted measures to cut off funding to enact the law's less popular provisions, such as enforcement of the requirement that most Americans carry health insurance, expansion of the Medicaid program for the poor and subsidies to offset the cost of buying insurance for lower-income workers.

• Environment: The new Republican majority in the House will use oversight hearings to try to pressure the EPA to back down from environmental regulations. Targets include EPA efforts to cut greenhouse-gas emissions from power plants and other big industrial facilities. Rep. Fred Upton (R., Mich.), the next chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, has said Republicans "will not allow" the Obama administration to issue the standards, siding with businesses that say the necessary technology doesn't exist. Republicans will also take aim at EPA plans to regulate the waste generated by coal-fired power plants.

• Immigration: Republicans are likely to shift their focus to tougher border-security measures and away from fighting the DREAM Act, which failed in the Senate. The measure would have provided a path to citizenship for young, undocumented immigrants who came to the U.S. as children. Rep. Steven King (R., Iowa), who is expected to become chairman of the House Judiciary Committee's immigration subcommittee, supports building a wall along the U.S. border with Mexico. The question is how far Republicans are willing to go in cracking down on illegal immigrants, many of whom are Latinos, at a time when the latest Census figures show Hispanics make up 15% of the U.S. population. An approach favored by Rep. Lamar Smith (R., Texas), the next head of the House Judiciary Committee, involves requiring businesses to verify workers' immigration status through an electronic system known as E-Verify.

• Judicial Nominations: Expect little change in the partisan grudge match over court picks, which Chief Justice John Roberts decried as a "recurring problem" in his year-end report Friday. Democrats will continue to control the Senate, which confirms federal judges. In the last Congress, however, judicial nominations were low on Democrats' priority list, disappointing liberal activists who felt the ex-law professor in the White House and his filibuster-resistant Senate majority squandered an opportunity to reshape the federal judiciary.

In contrast, Republicans long have made molding the courts a top objective. As they did in the last Congress, Republicans likely will make up in energy what they lack in numbers, using parliamentary privileges to slow or block Obama nominees.

• Education: School reform has been identified by Mr. Obama as an area of possible compromise. Rep. John Boehner (R., Ohio), the new House speaker, has an interest in the issue dating to his co-authorship of the 2001 No Child Left Behind Act that is up for renewal. But the parties have long warred over education funding questions, and the budget deficit will make these even more pressing. Any government program expansion could run into opposition from the influx of tea-party Republicans who want a reduced federal role in the schools."

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703820904576058200075558840.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
 
Actually, Mojo points out where, in his first link, where a person calls the idea of not raising the debt ceiling "insanity". You can find it if you actually read instead of assuming.

Mojo's 2nd link shows that it is TEA party representative-elect that is calling for voting down raising the debt ceiling.

Hence, the Obama administration is who calls the TEA party "insane" for their stance that the debt ceiling should not be raised.

That Mojo seems to disagree with that analysis he does not make clear, but I imply it from his support of Damn Yankee's post. Additional clue, Mojo puts the word "insanity" in quotes.

Aside to Mojo: how DO you stand on this issue? It still seems strange to me you post so much without any indication where you actually stand on issues.

actually, you need to read more carefully....it isn't talking about tea party insanity in the first link, it is talking about anyone...and the reality is that it isn't just tea party members against raising the debt ceiling...so you see, it is mojo giving an opinion, because no one on the obama admin in his link specifically called out just the tea party....he is calling out everyone who is against raising it, however, mojo only singles out the tea party...

putting in quotes and NOT putting a question mark indicates to me that it is his opinion...but who knows, the guy is basically a news bot and mostly just cuts and pastes the internet onto jpp
 
actually, you need to read more carefully....it isn't talking about tea party insanity in the first link, it is talking about anyone...and the reality is that it isn't just tea party members against raising the debt ceiling...so you see, it is mojo giving an opinion, because no one on the obama admin in his link specifically called out just the tea party....he is calling out everyone who is against raising it, however, mojo only singles out the tea party...

putting in quotes and NOT putting a question mark indicates to me that it is his opinion...but who knows, the guy is basically a news bot and mostly just cuts and pastes the internet onto jpp
Title of the referenced first link:
Goolsbee to Tea Party: 'Playing Chicken' With Debt Ceiling Vote is 'Insanity'

From the article:
"Some conservatives in Congress, especially new Tea Party members, have said they will vote against raising the debt limit"

Also:
"Incoming Republican House Speaker John Boehner has said he will work to convince new members to vote to raise the limit," pretty much eliminates republican leadership, doesn't it?

That pretty much leaves those elected under the TEA party banner, doesn't it? (unless you are thinking of accusing democrats of threatening to block raising the debt ceiling....)
 
Title of the referenced first link:
Goolsbee to Tea Party: 'Playing Chicken' With Debt Ceiling Vote is 'Insanity'

From the article:
"Some conservatives in Congress, especially new Tea Party members, have said they will vote against raising the debt limit"

Also:
"Incoming Republican House Speaker John Boehner has said he will work to convince new members to vote to raise the limit," pretty much eliminates republican leadership, doesn't it?

That pretty much leaves those elected under the TEA party banner, doesn't it? (unless you are thinking of accusing democrats of threatening to block raising the debt ceiling....)

you need read between the lines...he is not singling out tea party members, that title may have, but he never did....so it appears you and mojo didn't read beyond the title, maybe thats why you love defending him so much...perhaps you can find a link where he actually singles them out, not some left wing rag

here is the AP title:

Obama aide: Don't 'play chicken' with debt ceiling
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap...R0hiJA?docId=c26335b5967a42d79bfa98959d725fc3

and the article makes clear that it is not just tea party folks against raising the debt limit, that was my point, thank you bolstering it...as this issue was recently raised, i don't know everyone's opinion on this, i don't know if there are blue dog dems against it or not...we'll see in the next couple of weeks
 
Who are the most vocal opponents of raising the debt limit? Not that it matters. You have decided to hate mojo for your own nepharious reasons. You will not even listen to those who know for certain whether the mojo ID is a troll or not.

Frankly I find the posts of nothing but others' opinions or news very much on the annoying side. But I do not attribute some sinister or partisan motive behind it as you do. The few times he has indicated his opinion, it pretty much follows libertarian philosophies.
 
Mojo's not a troll. A pest, but not a troll. He's posted from dozens of IP's, typical if you use a wireless network such as Clear or Mobi, and none of those IP's are associated with any other user names. That's highly unusual for a troll. I've never seen a troll pull it off.

So, as per usual, keeping at 100% of the time, Yurt is dead wrong.
 
Who are the most vocal opponents of raising the debt limit? Not that it matters. You have decided to hate mojo for your own nepharious reasons. You will not even listen to those who know for certain whether the mojo ID is a troll or not.

Frankly I find the posts of nothing but others' opinions or news very much on the annoying side. But I do not attribute some sinister or partisan motive behind it as you do. The few times he has indicated his opinion, it pretty much follows libertarian philosophies.

?

i don't hate him and i'm not the only one who thinks he is a troll...and no one has said he isn't, so i have no clue what you babbling about....i think you're taking this mojo thing a little too personal...i really have no idea why you've taken it upon yourself to defend this guy at every turn, but whatever floats your boat

your sentence about sinister is nonsense, this thread makes no sense and your defense of it is bizarre...he completely changed the titles to make it appear as a statement, no one but him made the statement yet you somehow believe i'm attributing this to something sinister....good lord, its a freakin political board and if the guy makes a statement, he needs to either stand by it or come out and inform that he was incorrectly trying to make the statement for someone in obama's admin

he shouldn't hide behind tough guys like you GL....
 
Mojo's not a troll. A pest, but not a troll. He's posted from dozens of IP's, typical if you use a wireless network such as Clear or Mobi, and none of those IP's are associated with any other user names. That's highly unusual for a troll. I've never seen a troll pull it off.

So, as per usual, keeping at 100% of the time, Yurt is dead wrong.

if you say so....but i'm not the only one and the dude has a grudge against me from day one....that is odd for a new poster given i never insulted him or had a argument with him....and others have insulted him and he doesn't have a problem with that....

that and his posting style led a few to believe he is a troll...so calm down and untwist your glazed panties
 
if you say so....but i'm not the only one and the dude has a grudge against me from day one....that is odd for a new poster given i never insulted him or had a argument with him....and others have insulted him and he doesn't have a problem with that....

that and his posting style led a few to believe he is a troll...so calm down and untwist your glazed panties

Don't blame him. I guess there's something about you that makes everyone vehemently abhor anything associated with you. I'm still trying to find out what that is. :dunno:
 
Don't blame him. I guess there's something about you that makes everyone vehemently abhor anything associated with you. I'm still trying to find out what that is. :dunno:

:rolleyes:

that was lame beefy, do we really need to resurect that thread

i had two posts with the guy and then he started to pretend to ignore me...for example, if i said something in one thread, he would either start a new thread to "answer" it, or "answer" in other thread....

thats troll behavior, and indicates he knew me prior to joining...hence, a former or current poster here....its easy to mask ip's and legion is apparently so good at it that damo and grind can't ascertain who he is
 
?

i don't hate him and i'm not the only one who thinks he is a troll...and no one has said he isn't, so i have no clue what you babbling about....
uh huh....he has closed off the same information on is user cp....posts almost identical....and had an issue with me right away...and makes the same snarky comments to STY immediately upon joining....yeah....nothing to see here

since you admit you can't tell who is legion troll....how do you know mojo is not? his posts are similar, in the snarkiness way...though this time he is not copying someone.....

*sigh*

You so don't understand what I say about this, but I'll give it another try.

One more time.

I can't tell you who Legion is, because as far as I can tell he's never had any regular username. Every username they have has been a troll of one kind or another. However, I can tell that they are part of Legion, because they share information between accounts that link them together.

There is no certain regular poster that y'all know and love that has been creating the Legion behind your backs. There is one prolific troll that likes to use different names. It is obvious when they create a new troll, we can tell that they are part of Legion.

If you make a troll we can tell (yes, we really can).

Mojo shares none of these things with STY or Legion. It may seem odd to you but according to everything we can see they are not the same person.

I only say this so that poor Mojo doesn't spend the next 7 years arguing with you about being STY (who still posts here on occasion and still uses STY...), or just leaves because they get tired of being called a "troll" without provocation. As far as we can tell, with all the information we have at our fingertips, Mojo is simply what he appears to be. A new poster, who hasn't created any troll accounts and shares no information with any other user...
Care to change your story?

i think you're taking this mojo thing a little too personal...i really have no idea why you've taken it upon yourself to defend this guy at every turn, but whatever floats your boat
Like I said, I find his posting techniques rather annoying. More than once I have asked him for an opinion, and gotten another OP link in return. However, my response to you in these instances is because I get tired of threads being interrupted by "you're a troll" crap, especially when there is not indication of such.

your sentence about sinister is nonsense, this thread makes no sense and your defense of it is bizarre...he completely changed the titles to make it appear as a statement, no one but him made the statement yet you somehow believe i'm attributing this to something sinister....good lord, its a freakin political board and if the guy makes a statement, he needs to either stand by it or come out and inform that he was incorrectly trying to make the statement for someone in obama's admin
Sorry, evidently the word sinister has a more sinister meaning to you than it does to me. I was basically saying I do not see any "ulterior" (is that a better word?) motives for the wording of Mojo's title.

But, just out of curiosity, if you think mojo is a troll, why do you respond at all? Why not respond to those whom you do not think of as trolls, and leave trolls alone? Ever heard of "don't feed the trolls"?
 
Back
Top