Tariff Man is back, and American consumers will pay for it

My point isn't about Trump per se. I refer to the 2007 post that said China was eating our lunch and costing us jobs and free traders don't care about the American worker, all they care about is getting cheap goods at Walmart (and Walmart is bad) etc. For years Unions have supported tariffs on steel and other goods in the name of protecting American jobs. You didn't hear folks complaining then.

Now all of a sudden tariffs are bad? And the cost of goods rising at Walmart is bad? That's what I'm not buying.

I pretty much agree, as I said..

As they say tariffs are a very blunt instrument & used as a last resort, I don't think he could wait that long...

DO you think the USA will prevail in this war??
 
I pretty much agree, as I said..

As they say tariffs are a very blunt instrument & used as a last resort, I don't think he could wait that long...

DO you think the USA will prevail in this war??

My honest answer to the bolded is I have no clue. What we're doing is against everything I believe and support. It's possible in five years (or pick a time frame) we say this current trade war turned out great for the U.S. but I wouldn't put money on that.
 
My honest answer to the bolded is I have no clue. What we're doing is against everything I believe and support. It's possible in five years (or pick a time frame) we say this current trade war turned out great for the U.S. but I wouldn't put money on that.
I am not morally opposed to tariffs, as they say this country was built on them & was one of the most protectionist countries in the world-but back in the day everyone was very protective..

They said there would be winners & losers, unfortunately the real winners are a very small part of the population & don't buy lots of cars & refrigerators etc...

IMHO it is quite understandable those who got shit on by the deal aint to happy about it....... Yes??
 
I am not morally opposed to tariffs, as they say this country was built on them & was one of the most protectionist countries in the world-but back in the day everyone was very protective..

They said there would be winners & losers, unfortunately the real winners are a very small part of the population & don't buy lots of cars & refrigerators etc...

IMHO it is quite understandable those who got shit on by the deal aint to happy about it....... Yes??

I've heard interviews with farmers on NPR who said they are currently getting sh*t on yet still support the trade war because they think it will be beneficial long term.

In theory i could be ok with short term pain if there's a long term benefit. A number of people might point to Volker and what he did with interest rates to crush inflation as an example.

I just don't see it happening here.
 
It is not all of us. At all. Most of the assholes that talk about the unions on this board (liberals) are neither part of union, nor do they support them financially. Just do what they do best. Leech off another persons work and struggle. Like illegal immigrants.
You will never find a fucking Democrat paying for anything extra when it comes out of their own pockets. That is just fact. Exploiting child labor, illegal labor and fucking the unions they supposedly support are common practice so they do not have to help their fellow Americans. That whole slave plantation mentality never left.

I enjoy discussing politics with you, my friend, but when you run off the rails and into the hyperbole forest, I'm done. Sorry. I'm one of those fucking Democrats that pays for plenty out of her own pockets, whether it's donating to charities that help others (not just animals), or choosing locally-grown over the much cheaper mass-produced foods, or --when we were both working -- paying more in taxes per year than many people make. And I am a former union worker as well.

Have a nice night.
 
So cutting off ours & their noses until one concedes is the great deal makers only option....... That is really kinda sad, isn't it??

Like w/ the TPP he didn't even try to negotiate, he pulled out.

Terrible deal, pls anyone here actually believe he read that??? Not even funny.....

I don't have a magic solution, I don't claim to be the worlds great deal makers.. I would not proceed to play the game on a world stage W/ ZERO EXPERIENCE...

What seems clear, regardless of how much more taxes we are forced to pay, china is not going to capitulate on certain things...

They are not going to stop stealing patents, nor forcing corporations to give up the tech....

The world is against these practices but instead of joining w/ them we are attacking & threatening them/ our allies just like they were our enemies.......

That has got to be horrible strategy in anyone's book............

What is you great plans??
The big sticking point with China isn't the Intellectual Property theft -it's our demand they change their corps away from the SOE ( state owned enterprise) models - and yes they are never gonna change that.

But the negotiations process complaint is their slow walking on EVERYTHING.
They are hoping Trump doesn't get re-elected and can continue their malign practices

The tariffs are hurting them MUCH MORE then us,and more tariffs mean more pressure.

They've been able to use the mercantile acquired cash reserves as a stimulus for their economy,
but even there the Chinese GDP is slowing, and thy cannot continue on that path given their design
for the "one belt one road " ( new silk road) initiatives

it would GREATLY HELP if we ratified our NAFTA 2 agreement, to show China we a re capable of action and not just
spinning our wheels on trade agreements
 
Economic experts -- including Mr. Owl -- have been saying all along that this is really going to drag down the economy. Not just the temporary Wall Street dips, but overall. Consumer spending is the engine that drives our economy; make its gas cost a lot more and people won't "drive" as much.
consumer spending is vibrant, consumer confidence high, and even our savings rate
is higher then it was pre-recession.
Tariffs haven't hurt the economy or caused inflation ( as of yet)..if we put a new 25% across the board tariff -
then yes that will drag down spending
 
I've heard interviews with farmers on NPR who said they are currently getting sh*t on yet still support the trade war because they think it will be beneficial long term.

In theory i could be ok with short term pain if there's a long term benefit. A number of people might point to Volker and what he did with interest rates to crush inflation as an example.

I just don't see it happening here.
ye of little faith. look at the structural trade relationship between China and the US.
we have a terrible balance of payments, but we don't rely solely on an export economy like China

so at the same time we might pay more on some goods, any reduction of trade with China hurts them much more.

interestingly our trade imbalance has actually gotten worse, so obviously we are still buying their exports
 
Those people are called Americans. Period. Unfortunately, Sailor, we no longer make a lot of things in this country that were available when we were young -- shoes, most clothing, fabrics to sew your own, tools, TVs, refrigerators, etc. In many cases we have no option to buy American and support American workers rather than "exploited" overseas workers. Regarding fresh produce, we want illegals to come pick it for cheap so it's cheap for us, and then go away when they're done. And don't come whining to us if you have pesticide poisoning or your child is born with birth defects.
more and more produce is machine picked.
we are i n fact manufacturing more durable goods as well with the return of mfg jobs

 
ye of little faith. look at the structural trade relationship between China and the US.
we have a terrible balance of payments, but we don't rely solely on an export economy like China

so at the same time we might pay more on some goods, any reduction of trade with China hurts them much more.

interestingly our trade imbalance has actually gotten worse, so obviously we are still buying their exports

This trade war has put a serious damper on business. It’s major uncertainty. It’s not all that dissimilar from the (over) regulatory environment during the Obama years that hampered businesses.

You can argue the short term pain is needed for the long term gain (not saying I agree but the argument can definitely be made) but it is having a negative effect on the business environment right now
 
more and more produce is machine picked.
we are i n fact manufacturing more durable goods as well with the return of mfg jobs

You are right; our productivity overall is quite high and has been for many years. Automation, though, has eliminated the lower-skilled factory positions. That's going to continue.
 
This trade war has put a serious damper on business. It’s major uncertainty. It’s not all that dissimilar from the (over) regulatory environment during the Obama years that hampered businesses.

You can argue the short term pain is needed for the long term gain (not saying I agree but the argument can definitely be made) but it is having a negative effect on the business environment right now
what serous damper caused by tariffs?
 
New York (CNN Business)The Tariff Man is back. President Donald Trump's newly proposed tariffs on China would be particularly bad news for US consumers.
Investors sold off well-known retail and tech stocks in response, because they would get hit hardest by the additional tariffs.

In his MAGA rally tonight, he said "the era of economics surrender is over". Go Trump!
 
New York (CNN Business)The Tariff Man is back. President Donald Trump's newly proposed tariffs on China would be particularly bad news for US consumers.
Investors sold off well-known retail and tech stocks in response, because they would get hit hardest by the additional tariffs.

"Tariffs are taxes on American consumers," said Rick Helfenbein, president and CEO of the American Apparel & Footwear Association. "The president's decision to proceed with adding these additional costs for hard-working American families is truly shocking."


Trump tweeted Thursday that he's proposing an additional 10% tariff on $300 billion's worth of Chinese-made products entering the United States. That includes things like smartphones, toys, footwear and many other consumer goods.

"American families shouldn't be a pawn in this trade war," said Hun Quach, vice president of international trade for the Retail Industry Leaders Association. "Today's announcement only moves us closer to consumers bearing the brunt of the pain."​


The National Retail Federation said it is disappointed the administration is doubling down on tarrifs.
"These additional tariffs will only threaten US jobs and raise costs for American families on everyday goods," said David French, senior vice president for government relations at the NRF. "The tariffs imposed over the past year haven't worked, and there's no evidence another tax increase on American businesses and consumers will yield new results."​

Investors weren't happy either. Shares of Best Buy (BBY) plunged more than 10%. Nike (NKE) was down 3%. Hasbro (HAS) fell 5% while rival toymaker Mattel (MAT) was down 7%. Apple (AAPL) fell about 2.5% while Chinese e-commerce giant Alibaba (BABA) was down more than 4%.
And the SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT), which counts Dillard's (DDS), Abercrombie & Fitch (ANF), Guess? (GES), L Brands (LB) and Kohl's (KSS) among its top 10 holdings, lost about 3%. Target (TGT) was down nearly 5%.

"Uncertainty will dampen business investment and trade flows," said Elena Duggar, Moody's associate managing director.

She said American consumers will pay higher prices for everyday items, such as electronics, clothing, footware and toys, because of the tariffs.
Semiconductor stocks, which have a big presence in China, also plunged due to worries that China could retaliate with further tariffs against the US tech industry.

The Philadelphia Semiconductor Index (SOX) fell 2%, led by drops in Intel (INTC), AMD (AMD), Nvidia (NVDA), Qualcomm (QCOM) and Broadcom (AVGO).
That led to a dramatic turnaround on Wall Street Thursday, with the Dow swinging from a 300-point gain earlier in the day to a more than 250-point loss.

https://www.cnn.com/2019/08/01/inve...:+rss/cnn_topstories+(RSS:+CNN+-+Top+Stories)

They didn’t pay for the last tariffs
 
so what ELSE can you do to get China to stop slow-walking trade negotiations? say please? :rolleyes:

Nobody wants tariffs they ae the stick that hits China and US farmers and consumers - but there is no other way to get China to negotiate -even with all the tariffs so far they are dragging their feet

Who is going to make a deal with Trump? They know he can just change his mind. He is not a trusted person. His word is meaningless.
 
I've heard interviews with farmers on NPR who said they are currently getting sh*t on yet still support the trade war because they think it will be beneficial long term.

In theory i could be ok with short term pain if there's a long term benefit. A number of people might point to Volker and what he did with interest rates to crush inflation as an example.

I just don't see it happening here.

Trump is doing the right thing, too many others have let the Chinese get away with blue murder, he's standing up to them!
 
consumer spending is vibrant, consumer confidence high, and even our savings rate
is higher then it was pre-recession.
Tariffs haven't hurt the economy or caused inflation ( as of yet)..if we put a new 25% across the board tariff -
then yes that will drag down spending

Yes but Mr. Owl says otherwise, to wit, to woo! He can also swivel his head like Linda Blair in the Exorcist.
 
what serous damper caused by tariffs?

It is importers who pay the tariffs. Consumers pay in higher prices. Caterpillar says the tariffs increased their costs 70 million dollars. They are raising prices and are less competitive internationally. Walmart says they had to raise prices due to extra costs. Steel and aluminum users say they raised prices 9 percent on appliances and other products.
The American consumer pays higher prices.
 
Back
Top