Target says theft losses are $400 million this year. Means real number is 10 X that.

Then don't quote me, dumbfuck!

I'll quote you whenever I fucking feel like it, douchbag, and when you behave like a Nazi moron I'm going to let you know.

You can always put me on ignore - as a matter of fact, why don't you? You're so stupid I'm certain I'll never learn anything from you.
 
I'll quote you whenever I fucking feel like it, douchbag, and when you behave like a Nazi moron I'm going to let you know.

You can always put me on ignore - as a matter of fact, why don't you? You're so stupid I'm certain I'll never learn anything from you.

If you're going to quote me, answer my question or shut the fuck up, you brainless twit!
 
If you're going to quote me, answer my question or shut the fuck up, you brainless twit!

Sure. I'll get right on that. You don't know what a "strawman" is, do you, Nazi? Go back and look at your original, "question". If you want me to respond, don't that again.

Also, eat a bag of dicks.
 
Sure. I'll get right on that. You don't know what a "strawman" is, do you, Nazi? Go back and look at your original, "question". If you want me to respond, don't that again.

Also, eat a bag of dicks.

Then do it, fuckwit!

I have no interest in adopting your fetishes.
 
Target says theft losses are $400 million this year. Means real number is 10 X that.

Almost certainly, the real number is slightly lower. There is no way it could be ten times higher.

There are four possible things that can happen to inventory:
1) It is sold.
2) It is retained, and counted periodically.
3) It is damaged.
4) It is lost, and presumably stolen.

If 10 times as much was lost as is known, the other numbers would be thrown off. You can do it a little with the inventory that is being retained. So if you had a candy bar stolen, and did not want it to show up in the numbers, you could claim it was still on the shelve. But, that trick runs out quickly as inventory numbers start getting insanely high.

Some of the lost items are not stolen. No one is really sure how much is just lost. We do know that many items are later found, they fell behind something, or were misplaced on the wrong shelf. Others get thrown away by mistake, or even get sold by mistake. I know Amazon has sometimes sold more large packs of food than they bought. In theory, they sold separated packs as sets, and therefore they have lost separated packs. They made more money selling the sets, so really cannot be said to have been stolen from. Even more often they sell items that should have been separated, but are not. So they would sell a master pack of two boxes of cat food in one, and lose one of the boxes. This is a loss of money, but not done on purpose, so not stolen.

Easy problem to solve. Let stores adopt the policy of "whites/asians only allowed in store."

Assuming any group will not steal you is a certain way to get them to steal from you. And it is amazingly racist. Not to mention untrue. Target's customer base is more white than the average.
 
YOU are the bigot since you support affirmative action and want whites denied jobs just for being white.

Actually no. I'm a white guy who's been hired a bunch of times even though I'm white. You know why? Because I have a track record of results. Affirmative action has not denied me any opportunities. If you've been denied a job, it's not because you're white, it's because you're unqualified.
 
YOU are the bigot since you support affirmative action and want whites denied jobs just for being white.

A few posts ago, you were talking about freedom of association, but now you are going back on it. If a business can only hire whites, it can also only hire Blacks, only hire 10% Blacks and 85% whites, or whatever they want, by your legal theory. Are you backing off that?
 
Uranidiot. Target is extremely woke and they love negroz, even negroz that steal from them. That means they minimize the theft losses. THINK

The reality is Target is mostly found in the suburbs, and so is more white than many other businesses... But let's play with your idea they love Blacks... Shouldn't they then have the right to ban whites, or maybe just whites who dislike Blacks. Once again, it is freedom of association... Don't you believe in freedom of association?
 
It will be interesting if the fired tend to be Seattle based....Amazon as certainly soured on Seattle as it decays into chaos and city leadership continues to drive the decline.

I doubt there are that many in Seattle. I suspect they will trim warehouse people across the country.
 
Actually no. I'm a white guy who's been hired a bunch of times even though I'm white. You know why? Because I have a track record of results. Affirmative action has not denied me any opportunities. If you've been denied a job, it's not because you're white, it's because you're unqualified.

Now how you gonna prove any of that?
 
A few posts ago, you were talking about freedom of association, but now you are going back on it. If a business can only hire whites, it can also only hire Blacks, only hire 10% Blacks and 85% whites, or whatever they want, by your legal theory. Are you backing off that?

You don't know what FOA means. If a company wants to hire only black or only white or only jooz or only trannies etc that should be allowed. Or any mixture.
 
The reality is Target is mostly found in the suburbs, and so is more white than many other businesses... But let's play with your idea they love Blacks... Shouldn't they then have the right to ban whites, or maybe just whites who dislike Blacks. Once again, it is freedom of association... Don't you believe in freedom of association?

Can't you read?. Of course target should be allowed to ban whites. They should be allowed to ban anyone. THINK
 
Back
Top