Talk about irony!

Taichiliberal

Shaken, not stirred!
The founder of Media Matters was originally a member of the right wing punditry when it was going strong under the guidance of Karl Rove and Roger Ailes. Supposedly, he had a come to Jesus moment, and thus started Media Matters, which has been a VERY SUCCESSFUL counter to the mass media right wing bull horn. But now, it seems that junior May have fallen back on some of his old ideology. If this is indeed 100% accurate, and NOT some right wing spin, then he'd better get his act together....FAST! STAY TUNED!


Statement from the Media Matters Organizing Committee


http://www.seiu500.org/2014/04/statement-from-the-media-matters-organizing-committee/


Media Matters refuses SEIU Local 500



http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/04/24/1294442/-Media-Matters-refuses-SEIU-Local-500#
 
It's so hypocritical. It's disgusting. MSNBC employees tried to get support from on-air talent, all of whom espouse pro-union politics in public, to no avail too from what I have read. A lot of these guys are phonies who say anything for money. Obviously on both sides of the fence.
 
your belief that the mass media is a right wing bullhorn marks you as a grade A idiot.

Stunning isn't it? But from the Progressive Liberal view they are in the center and anything right of them are right wing Fascists. Therefore, if the media doesn't march lockstep with their repugnant stupidity, they must be right wing bullhorns. Ask a tough question of Obummer, you're a right wing bullhorn. Question his failed economic policies, you're a racist and a right wing bullhorn....etc etc etc.

Media matters? Only dunces pay attention to that leftist propaganda bullhorn.
 
your belief that the mass media is a right wing bullhorn marks you as a grade A idiot.


The libertarian lunkhead strikes again!

Here's something else for you to ignore:


If the media are so liberal, why do they keep focusing on debt/deficit/austerity and not the arguments against austerity that all the liberal economists are making?

If the media are so liberal, why did they ignore the 2011 Tar Sands protests in DC and the hundreds of arrested protesters, including a renowned NASA scientist?

If the media are so liberal, why have they completely ignored the controversy surrounding the drilling of the Alberta Tar Sands?

If the media are so liberal, why did they parrot Bush's link between Iraq & 9/11, and his claim that Iraq still had WMD's, while ignoring the many experts who could disprove these claims?

If the media are so liberal, why did they cheerlead us into the Iraq war, while censoring those who opposed it?

If the media are so liberal, why did they virtually ignore the largest anti-war protest in the history of mankind on the eve of the Iraq invasion in 2003, but have since given plenty of mostly uncritical coverage of much smaller Tea Party protests?


http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/04/23/1204303/-How-to-Debunk-the-Liberal-Media-Myth#


Oh, and before you bray the usual neocon/teabagger line about the Daily Kos, riddle me this: if the MSM was so liberally biased, then why isn't the DAILY Kos and it's creator highlighted in weekly news stories? Carry on.
 
Stunning isn't it? But from the Progressive Liberal view they are in the center and anything right of them are right wing Fascists. Therefore, if the media doesn't march lockstep with their repugnant stupidity, they must be right wing bullhorns. Ask a tough question of Obummer, you're a right wing bullhorn. Question his failed economic policies, you're a racist and a right wing bullhorn....etc etc etc.

Media matters? Only dunces pay attention to that leftist propaganda bullhorn.

Time and again, willfully ignorant clods like you just parrot what is spewed by Drudge or Levine or the WND and the like....then swear you don't use ANY known media source that strangely mirrors the convoluted dreck you post here. Subsequently, you don't dare read the content of the site, because that would entail an actual debate as to the validity of source material (of which you personally have none).

In short, you're just full of it. But maybe you can grow a pair by answering the following:

http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?62385-Talk-about-irony!&p=1485990#post1485990

UNLIKE YOU AND YOUR LIKE MINDED COHORTS, I HAVE NO PROBLEM CRITICIZING THOSE WHO SHARE VIEWPOINTS IF THEY ARE WRONG.
 
The libertarian lunkhead strikes again!

Here's something else for you to ignore:


If the media are so liberal, why do they keep focusing on debt/deficit/austerity and not the arguments against austerity that all the liberal economists are making?

If the media are so liberal, why did they ignore the 2011 Tar Sands protests in DC and the hundreds of arrested protesters, including a renowned NASA scientist?

If the media are so liberal, why have they completely ignored the controversy surrounding the drilling of the Alberta Tar Sands?

If the media are so liberal, why did they parrot Bush's link between Iraq & 9/11, and his claim that Iraq still had WMD's, while ignoring the many experts who could disprove these claims?

If the media are so liberal, why did they cheerlead us into the Iraq war, while censoring those who opposed it?

If the media are so liberal, why did they virtually ignore the largest anti-war protest in the history of mankind on the eve of the Iraq invasion in 2003, but have since given plenty of mostly uncritical coverage of much smaller Tea Party protests?


http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/04/23/1204303/-How-to-Debunk-the-Liberal-Media-Myth#


Oh, and before you bray the usual neocon/teabagger line about the Daily Kos, riddle me this: if the MSM was so liberally biased, then why isn't the DAILY Kos and it's creator highlighted in weekly news stories? Carry on.

You make me laugh.
 
It's so hypocritical. It's disgusting. MSNBC employees tried to get support from on-air talent, all of whom espouse pro-union politics in public, to no avail too from what I have read. A lot of these guys are phonies who say anything for money. Obviously on both sides of the fence.

Do you know what else is hypocritical and disgusting it is someone that deliberately edits another poster's comments!! Why did you replace Doesn't excuse what he did with an ellipsis? Is it because you are a mendacious and duplicitous toerag?
 
I am amused that Darla and Tai are surprised. Liberals are always capitalists and conservatives with their own money. It is only with others money that they get extremely generoua
 
Back
Top