I have a question for anyone who supported GWB's request for authorization to go to war in Iraq but is opposed to BHO's request for authorization to bomb Syria.
Considering that the case against Syria breaking international law is better than that against Iraq and that the scope of the mission in Syria is not even in the same ball park as the request regarding Iraq why?
Have you learned a lesson?
Am I missing something?
Do you simply enjoy opposing President Obama?
What's the deal?
Considering that the case against Syria breaking international law is better than that against Iraq and that the scope of the mission in Syria is not even in the same ball park as the request regarding Iraq why?
Have you learned a lesson?
Am I missing something?
Do you simply enjoy opposing President Obama?
What's the deal?