SVB Bailout Straw Poll

Should The government Bail Out Silicon Valley Bank?


  • Total voters
    21
That is not very accurate.

A logical fallacy violates syllogistic structure. Aristotle defined the fallacies as sophistry that can be disproven through the logic of syllogism.

A simple syllogism is

a=b
b=c
therefore c must equal a

A simple fallacy would be

a=b
c=d
therefore c must equal a

Logically, this fails. C might equal a - but nothing in the syllogism proves this. That fallacy is in the declarative - c MUST equal a - that is false.

A fallacy is an error in logic. Any error in logic.
This particular example is known as an undistributed middle fallacy, and is a formal fallacy. Like all fallacies, it is an invalid argument.
 
Hi! I'm Legion's Tiny Penis and I looooooove Trump's Tiny Penis too!

Lionfish's Mr. Tiny Penis NSFW

Every time Lionfish posts "Mr. Tiny Penis" please remember he is salivating over this:

6mfx3t.jpg
^^^
Tiny Penis Syndrome
 
From the democrat Reich propaganda outlet;

{n a joint statement Sunday, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Chairman Martin J. Gruenberg said the FDIC will make SVB and Signature’s customers whole. By guaranteeing all deposits – even the uninsured money that customers kept with the failed banks – the government aimed to prevent more bank runs and to help companies that deposited large sums with the banks to continue to make payroll and fund their operations.}

https://edition.cnn.com/2023/03/12/investing/svb-customer-bailout/index.html

That would include the $42 billion Goldman-Sachs has in SBV

democrats always support raping the public to protect the Oligarchs.

Dems always support this? Man, you have a short memory. Perhaps you don't remember this. What's your dollar figure for SVB as opposed to the $700 BILLION that bush allowed?

"The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, often called the "bank bailout of 2008", was proposed by Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, passed by the 110th United States Congress, and signed into law by President George W. Bush. It became law as part of Public Law 110-343 on October 3, 2008, in the midst of the financial crisis of 2007–2008. It created the $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) to purchase toxic assets from banks. The funds were mostly redirected to inject capital into banks and other financial institutions while the Treasury continued to examine the usefulness of targeted asset purchases."[SUP][1][/SUP][SUP][2][/SUP]
 
I'd say zero.

So why did Twitter not fail - as the Reich promised it would? Free speech would make the Work corporations flee and Twitter income would vanish without prohibition of speech by those not spreading the word of the Reich.

But the opposite happened - Twitter has flourished.

^ Then you would be wrong. Do the work, don't just post an opinion.

Twitter's overvalued. Look at the link.

It shows that Twitter was highly overvalued and closed at $53.70 in October. https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/twtr/

Where are the numbers after that? You said it "flourished." Show me.
 
^ Then you would be wrong. Do the work, don't just post an opinion.

Twitter's overvalued. Look at the link.

It shows that Twitter was highly overvalued and closed at $53.70 in October. https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/twtr/

Where are the numbers after that? You said it "flourished." Show me.

A dingo-fucking dumbass like Underscore doesn't know shit about Twitter, America or high-tech. He's just blowing Aussie braggadocio out of his fat ass.
 
Dems always support this? Man, you have a short memory. Perhaps you don't remember this. What's your dollar figure for SVB as opposed to the $700 BILLION that bush allowed?

"The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, often called the "bank bailout of 2008", was proposed by Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, passed by the 110th United States Congress, and signed into law by President George W. Bush. It became law as part of Public Law 110-343 on October 3, 2008, in the midst of the financial crisis of 2007–2008. It created the $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) to purchase toxic assets from banks. The funds were mostly redirected to inject capital into banks and other financial institutions while the Treasury continued to examine the usefulness of targeted asset purchases."[SUP][1][/SUP][SUP][2][/SUP]

Impressive whataboutism.

It doesn't change the fact that this is a bailout of the wealthy - YET AGAIN.
 
^ Then you would be wrong. Do the work, don't just post an opinion.

Twitter's overvalued. Look at the link.

It shows that Twitter was highly overvalued and closed at $53.70 in October. https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/twtr/

Where are the numbers after that? You said it "flourished." Show me.

You Nazis have been saying that ever since Musk bought it - yet your predictions fall flat, every time.

You of the left base your statements on your bigotry and your partisanship - not on the facts.
 
A dingo-fucking dumbass like Underscore doesn't know shit about Twitter, America or high-tech. He's just blowing Aussie braggadocio out of his fat ass.

Douche Duck, you mindless fuck - you voted that you did not want a bailout, one assumes your to be lying - as you are a pathological liar and lie even when it gains you nothing.

So my assumption is that you do want intervention by the state - perhaps a takeover of the bank? That fits with your fascist leanings. Or perhaps like the other Nazis in this discussion, you're lying and claiming this is just standard FDIC payouts?

Regardless, we know that you are lying - you are not capable of doing anything without lying.
 
You Nazis have been saying that ever since Musk bought it - yet your predictions fall flat, every time.

You of the left base your statements on your bigotry and your partisanship - not on the facts.
Douche Duck, you mindless fuck - you voted that you did not want a bailout, one assumes your to be lying - as you are a pathological liar and lie even when it gains you nothing.

So my assumption is that you do want intervention by the state - perhaps a takeover of the bank? That fits with your fascist leanings. Or perhaps like the other Nazis in this discussion, you're lying and claiming this is just standard FDIC payouts?

Regardless, we know that you are lying - you are not capable of doing anything without lying.
You seem to focus a lot on Nazis, Underscore. Were you a Nazi once? Did you hang out with these losers?

2fr5wf.jpg


How big of a scumbag loser do you have to become to be thrown out of an Aussie Nazi assclown club?
 
Should the government bail out Silicon Valley Bank?

Looks like other banks are coming to the rescue.

Who would have thought that Banks are actually bailing themselves out of their own mess this time!

But, I do believe that the regulations Trump ended, are coming right back and the Republicans are leading the charge!

Who would have thunk it?

Lovin' every minute of it!
 
Looks like other banks are coming to the rescue.

Who would have thought that Banks are actually bailing themselves out of their own mess this time!

But, I do believe that the regulations Trump ended, are coming right back and the Republicans are leading the charge!

Who would have thunk it?

Lovin' every minute of it!

banks are coming to the rescue?

gotta link?
 
banks are coming to the rescue?

gotta link?

We are just going to have to watch and see what banks are gladly buying up all the Treasury bonds and Real Estate Securities involved.

The yields on them are still attractive when they fully mature, so it's not a loss at all really, for the banks that have enough capital, in the form of depositors, to sit on them for a while.

Because all of the details are not fully known quite yet, who all the buyers are!
 
Last edited:
No, it isn't - retard.

FDIC insures only the depositor - and only up to $250,000

This is slated to give BILLIONS of dollars to Goldman-Sachs and other banksters to cover the losses of the Oligarchs who gambled on SVB and lost.

Typical democrat Nazi game of public risk, private gain. The ties of GS to Obama and Biden are legendary.

Once again we see you stealing from the poor to give to the rich - it's always the same with you.

Now site facts to prove your claim
 
We are just going to have to watch and see what banks are gladly buying up all the Treasury bonds and Real Estate Securities involved.

The yields on them are still attractive when they fully mature, so it's not a loss at all really, for the banks that have enough capital, in the form of depositors, to sit on them for a while.

Because all of the details are not fully known quite yet, who all the buyers are!

wtf are you talking about?

the govt is bailing out beyond the 250,000 k cap.

that's bailing out other banks that put their cash in this bank and then collapsed it precisely for the bailout.

wake up, you dumb fucker.
 
You seem to focus a lot on Nazis, Underscore. Were you a Nazi once? Did you hang out with these losers?

How big of a scumbag loser do you have to become to be thrown out of an Aussie Nazi assclown club?

You are a Nazi, hence when I bother to grace you with a reply, that fact of your Nazism is bound to emerge.

If you had double your current IQ - perhaps up to 50, you would grasp this.

But you are a pathological liar, a Nazi, and really very stupid.
 
You are a Nazi, hence when I bother to grace you with a reply, that fact of your Nazism is bound to emerge.

If you had double your current IQ - perhaps up to 50, you would grasp this.

But you are a pathological liar, a Nazi, and really very stupid.

You're free to lie all you want, dingo-breath. The fact remains you're the one acting like a Nazi and supporting Nazis in America.

What happened? Did Australia get rid of all their Nazis like St. Patrick rid Ireland of snakes? You have to come to an American forum to play White Supremacist Nazi fuckwit? :laugh: :rofl2: :laugh:

2rb10a.jpg
 
Back
Top