Sussmann acquitted on charge brought by special counsel Durham

Lionfish said:
This message is hidden because LurchAddams is on your ignore list.
Click to expand...

Awww.. don't go way mad :)


Wait.. before you go.. I'm getting something over my earpiece.. it's very faint.. what is it? OH! I'm getting a "zero".. write that down before I forget.. what's next? Man.. I'm having trouble.. what is it? Ok.. yeah..

so that's the word, "for" for some reason. Well.. that doesn't make sense, "for" is NOT a number.. are you crazy? HOLD ON.. I'm getting another number.. little louder please.. got it! THREE!

ZERO FOR THREE, MUTHAH FUCKAAAAAAAAH!!!!!! WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! :)
 
guno said:
The first courtroom test for Special Counsel John Durham ended in defeat Tuesday as a federal jury found a Democratic attorney not guilty of making a false statement to the FBI about allegations of computer links between Donald Trump and Russia.

The jury deliberated for about six hours before acquitting Michael Sussmann, 57, on the single felony charge he faced: that he lied when he allegedly denied he was acting on behalf of any client in alerting the FBI to claims that a secret server linked Trump and a Moscow bank with ties to Russian President Vladimir Putin.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crim...AAXVzcz?cvid=a5eb5e6fe0374ae5b9c0f57947111053
Click to expand...

HAVING HILLARY and DNC DONORS ON THE DC JURY SURE HELPED THE OBVIOUSLY GUILTY SUSSMAN.

NEXT TRIAL WILL NOT BE IN DC....
 
LurchAddams said:
You know. These morons think they've been sent by God or something. I think Durham really though he could deliver. Such disappointment for the trump cult. I wonder how welcome Durhams going to be at those Republican cigar bars where they say the "n" word freely.

zero for three <--- I sooooooooooooooooooooooooo LOVE the sound of that :)
Click to expand...
I have to wonder if Durham even wanted the gig?

Sure...he got to dig into classified documents at the heart of the crimes that trump committed. What's interesting, is that he should have been demanding complicity from the trump klan for the meeting at trump tower with Russian operatives.

I'm sure he found damning evidence, but the best he could actually come up with to shame Clinton was...nothing.
 
We shouldn't be surprised that the prosecution couldn't prove the thoughts of Sussman, especially in a court system designed to let guilty people go.
 
Althea said:
I have to wonder if Durham even wanted the gig?

Sure...he got to dig into classified documents at the heart of the crimes that trump committed. What's interesting, is that he should have been demanding complicity from the trump klan for the meeting at trump tower with Russian operatives.

I'm sure he found damning evidence, but the best he could actually come up with to shame Clinton was...nothing.
Click to expand...

Oh, he wanted the gig. His pic was all over Republican webistes. He was their "savior'. He was going to deliver the "deep state" to the Republicans. LOL. I know and I think you know he thought he was, "the shit".

Well. Guess what? A-zero, and A-th-a-reeee :)
 
Lionfish said:
No more so than Clinton record setting list of pardons. We can discuss obama's list if you wish.
Click to expand...

So you and Trump were blatantly lying your fat asses off when you said Trump would clean up the swamp.

Trump was just as corrupt and unethical as any president, and moreso than most.
 
guno said:
The first courtroom test for Special Counsel John Durham ended in defeat Tuesday as a federal jury found a Democratic attorney not guilty of making a false statement to the FBI about allegations of computer links between Donald Trump and Russia.

The jury deliberated for about six hours before acquitting Michael Sussmann, 57, on the single felony charge he faced: that he lied when he allegedly denied he was acting on behalf of any client in alerting the FBI to claims that a secret server linked Trump and a Moscow bank with ties to Russian President Vladimir Putin.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crim...AAXVzcz?cvid=a5eb5e6fe0374ae5b9c0f57947111053
Click to expand...

Further proof that leftist hack Democrats on juries don't care about justice or the facts of a case. :sad:
 
Althea said:
Go ahead. How many treasonous felons did Clinton pardon?
Click to expand...

You know, Althea. I think we need to slow things down a little for Lion.. she's really trying hard to keep up and it is ADORABLE to watch her try.

But, Althea.. c'mon. Don't be cruel to little miss Lion. You need to keep it simple. So, just give her the current Republican railroad attempt score:


ZERO FOR THREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE YAH BABEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top