Supreme Court says Illinois may ban sale of rapid-fire assault weapons for now

ExpressLane said:
Not true. My family owns a farm in East Texas and watermelons are our number one crop. If we don't shoot the feral pigs that live on the property they will decimate our melon fields. They do tens of thousands of dollars on damage. The best tool for that job is a AR15 with a night scope. Sometimes the roaming herds of wild pigs will number more than a hundred. It is important to shoot as many as you can as quickly as you can before they scatter and return another night to destroy the fields. Pigs are pretty smart if you shoot a bunch of them they won't come back very soon.

To me AR 15s are tools, not unlike tractors or plows.
Click to expand...

My father owned a quarter section of land in middle Tennessee.

He had cornfields and after the hogs (tame) were allowed to eat the ears left after harvest, there would be a lot of corn kernels left on the ground.

We would have dove-shoots and we called the cornfields…”hogged off cornfields.”

I had a .410 at 12 and a 12 gauge at fourteen…heavily supervised by my older brothers and my father.
 
Last edited:
Earl said:
My father owned a quarter section of land in middle Tennessee.

He had cornfields and after the hogs (tame) were allowed to eat the ears left after harvest, there would be a lot of corn kernels left on the ground.

We would have dove-shoots and we called the cornfields…”hogged off cornfields.”
Click to expand...
My roommate in college farmed 2000 acres of winter wheat in Eastern Colorado. We used to hunt for pheasants on the farm. It was like shooting fish in a barrel. The pheasants were plentiful and were so fat they could barely fly.
 
ExpressLane said:
My roommate in college farmed 2000 acres of winter wheat in Eastern Colorado. We used to hunt for pheasants on the farm. It was like shooting fish in a barrel. The pheasants were plentiful and were so fat they could barely fly.
Click to expand...

He farmed 2000 acres of wheat? That’s a lot of wheat.

I’ve never hunted or eaten pheasants…are they as good as people say?
 
Eagle_Eye said:
I don't believe he ever got within 3000 miles of Nam. Most likely he spent his time cleaning latrines at Fort Benning.
Click to expand...

You better hope that I don't get within reach of you, you disgusting motherfucker.
Cleaning latrines at Fort Benning?

No, you malignant pissant, that isn't what I did.

While you were probably sucking the pus out of syphilitic cock sores,
I was someplace that no American needed to be
doing absolutely nothing in the service of any American people
other than war profiteering oligarchs. America was in no danger,
but its youth were for no defensible reason.

Think of that when you're trying to polish your medals with one hand
because you're jerking off to General Westmoreland with the other,
you disgusting dumb fuck.
You probably see yourself as a hero for being a fucking victim, you loathsome asshole.

I was put in conflict with people with whom I had no personal grievance whatsoever,
other than they were trying to kill me for being a foreign invader on their land.

Soldier? You? Soldiers don't speak disrespectfully to veterans, even veterans that didn't need to be veterans but went
because if they didn't go, somebody else would have to, you pigfucking mutant maggot.

I've had discourse with many incredibly disgusting deplorables on this forum,
but congratulations; you win the pony.
Just get the poor thing's dick out of your mouth.
 
guno said:
The Supreme Court on Wednesday turned down a 2nd Amendment appeal from gun owners and let stand for now an Illinois law banning the sale of the rapid-fire assault weapons that have been used to carry out mass shootings across the country.

In an unsigned order with no dissents, the justices rejected an emergency appeal that asked them to block a local ordinance and the state ban from taking effect.

While the court's action is not a ruling on the broader constitutional issue, it is a good sign for California and the eight other states that also ban the sale of assault weapons.

Usually, justices would block a new law from taking effect if they believe it is unconstitutional.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/s...B?cvid=c83f5b26bbcd46bea41629eb48c2e69e&ei=31
Click to expand...

What the fuck are 'rapid-fire assault weapons'?
 
NiftyNiblick said:
Banning further sales of assault weapons is a very insufficient measure.
The existing ones should be confiscated with Draconian consequences imposed for failure to cooperate.

The tax payers would unfortunately have to bear the burden of funding at least some monetary compensation
but that's our own fault for allowing the distribution of those weapons in the first place.
Click to expand...

Molon Labe, motherfucker
 
Gondwanaland said:
Yeah you're too big of a pussy to.

I hope they do come. Far past time for the tree of liberty to be watered.
Click to expand...

We agree on something. I hope that they come too.
There's no upside to keeping your kind around, right?
Wear Kevlar underpants, because when the feds do come, their guns will be pointed at your running ass.:laugh:
 
NiftyNiblick said:
We agree on something. I hope that they come too.
There's no upside to keeping your kind around, right?
Wear Kevlar underpants, because when the feds do come, their guns will be pointed at your running ass.:laugh:
Click to expand...
Yes, pussy-ass bitch, you'll send others to die in your stead to try to attack our rights. Because you're a fucking cunt. You're gonna have to send quite a big squad to take me, pussy. I'll die free if I have to.
 
65f543ec513f23c41e7f8f47a01e2bea885ee02c-2824747-jpg.1286442
 
Hello guno,

guno said:
The Supreme Court on Wednesday turned down a 2nd Amendment appeal from gun owners and let stand for now an Illinois law banning the sale of the rapid-fire assault weapons that have been used to carry out mass shootings across the country.

In an unsigned order with no dissents, the justices rejected an emergency appeal that asked them to block a local ordinance and the state ban from taking effect.

While the court's action is not a ruling on the broader constitutional issue, it is a good sign for California and the eight other states that also ban the sale of assault weapons.

Usually, justices would block a new law from taking effect if they believe it is unconstitutional.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/s...B?cvid=c83f5b26bbcd46bea41629eb48c2e69e&ei=31
Click to expand...

They are conservative. They are not extremists.
 
Eagle_Eye said:
Verified User

This message is hidden because*NiftyNiblick*is on your*ignore list.
Click to expand...

He won’t be posting on my threads either.

Only a half-wit cretin would say that Florida should be “Shermanned” including his own relatives who live there.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top