Hahaha. I need to put those 10# back on.
Christiecrite: I lost 10 pounds.
Me: Turn around. Hmm, there they are. I found them.
Hahaha. I need to put those 10# back on.
Christiecrite: I lost 10 pounds.
Me: Turn around. Hmm, there they are. I found them.![]()
Your imagination is hilarious. Don't make me laugh so much or I'll lose another pound.
Indeed.
Would you single out a Muslim shop and demand pork products for the purpose of claiming you were being "discriminated against" by "religious bigots", Andrew?
Knock it off Wilhelmina you're being an idiot
""Jack serves all customers; he simply declines to express messages or celebrate events that violate his deeply held beliefs," Waggoner said in a statement. "Creative professionals who serve all people should be free to create art consistent with their convictions without the threat of government punishment."
She further added that the case "will affect a number of cases for years to come in free exercise jurisprudence. That's how the court's decisions work."
It has nothing to do with the first amendment at all.
It just seems to me if the bakerys would not a guy couple an appropriately decorated cake because of sin, why do they sell the cakes to the obese?
So you say. BTW, I was being kind when I said I'd only found 10 pounds.![]()
Let the board note that this is a clear case of projection. 'Nuff said.Let the board note that this is a clear case of projection. 'Nuff said.

It just seems to me if the bakerys would not a guy couple an appropriately decorated cake because of sin, why do they sell the cakes to the obese?
The justices did not issue a definitive ruling on the circumstances under which people can seek exemptions from anti-discrimination laws based on their religious views. The decision also did not address important claims raised in the case including whether baking a cake is a kind of expressive act protected by the Constitution's free speech guarantee.
they ruled in the one case, it didn't change case law
Kennedy also stressed the importance of gay rights while noting that litigation on similar issues is likely to continue in lower courts.
"Our society has come to the recognition that gay persons and gay couples cannot be treated as social outcasts or as inferior in dignity and worth," Kennedy wrote.
"The outcome of cases like this in other circumstances must await further elaboration in the courts, all in the context of recognizing that these disputes must be resolved with tolerance, without undue disrespect to sincere religious beliefs, and without subjecting gay persons to indignities when they seek goods and services in an open market," Kennedy added.
I wasn't aware that enabling the obese is regarded as sin in the Bible.
Good thing for Christiecrite that it's not.![]()
Funny the things conservatives defend now days. Gluttony is a sin, because it deprives the poor of food. Oh wait, conservatives don't care about them either.
You haven't won many debates, have you?
Nobody has claimed that obese people or the poor have been discriminated against by Christian bakers, have they?
Why do they refuse to sell cakes to same sex couples?
Maybe his religious beliefs do not see that as a sin.