Supreme Court Ruling, 7 to 2 decision for the Colorado Baker.

[Legion]

This legal precedent sets civil rights law back a generation.

It does?

 

[christiefan915]

No. You stuck your snout in here.

Your reluctance to read a logical dissent is noted.

 

[Legion]

But will you sell them "shrimp"??

That'd be like carrying coal to Newcastle.

 

[Legion]

Your reluctance to read a logical dissent is noted.

Your penchant for pretending expert knowledge you don't possess is noted.

 

[Sailor]

But will you sell them "shrimp"??

That was funny!!!!!!!!!! HA!

 

[christiefan915]

Your penchant for pretending expert knowledge you don't posses is noted.

I learned from the best.

 

[Legion]

I learned from the best.

You refused to learn, as I recall.

 

[christiefan915]

You refused to learn, as I recall.

So you say.

 

[Legion]

So you say.

I have evidence, as we both know.

 

[Flash]

Mealy mouthed apology for punting. The issue is simple. If you are doing business you can't exclude paying customers for irrational or arbitrary reasons.
Superstitious religions are irrational, excluding gay people as customers is irrational. Should have been so easy to be clear and correct. Practice your moral
degradations privately in your churches or in your homes.

I think any business like this bigot cake mofo should be required to have a "we do no serve gays" sign in neon on his door. He can shame himself.

It doesn't matter if religion is irrational since it has constitutional protections.

Does that mean if a person wanted a cake with anti-black, anti-gay, pro-Nazi, pro-Klan, or pro-pedophile messages the baker would be required to take their money and make their cake? Or that Jehovah's Witness children can be required to stand and pledge allegiance since it is based on their irrational superstitious religious beliefs?

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Mealy mouthed apology for punting. The issue is simple. If you are doing business you can't exclude paying customers for irrational or arbitrary reasons.
Superstitious religions are irrational, excluding gay people as customers is irrational. Should have been so easy to be clear and correct. Practice your moral
degradations privately in your churches or in your homes.

I think any business like this bigot cake mofo should be required to have a "we do no serve gays" sign in neon on his door. He can shame himself.

The FACT that you have already voiced your bias, by call it superstitious religion, shows that any comment or thought you have on the subject can just be dismissed; because of your bias.

Once more for those with trouble with the FACTS, he was not EXCLUDING anyone.
They were free to purchase anything that was on the shelves.
He did refuse to use his artistic talents to create what they wanted.

Why are so many people unable to separate the completely two different acts of BAKING and MAKING??

 

[zymurgy]

So you say.

look at that. the little pussy comes out of hiding to engage in mindless rhetoric while ignoring issues of substance and intellect

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Correct.
None the less this ruling allows the baker to harass the betrothed couple.

In high population concentrations like New York City, that's often an option.

BUT !!

Now that this precedent is set, empowering bigoted bakers to discriminate, what other bases will similar / parallel rulings allow shopkeepers to discriminate on?
- race
- religion
- ethnicity
- political affiliation
? ? ? ?

In addition, while there's more than one bakery in the boroughs, in rural Montana, that may not be a practical solution.

This legal precedent sets civil rights law back a generation.

When did this "harassment" occur; because this appears to be a new hat being thrown in the ring?

 

[christiefan915]

I have evidence, as we both know.

As do I.

 

[Flash]

Once more for those with trouble with the FACTS, he was not EXCLUDING anyone. They were free to purchase anything that was on the shelves. He did refuse to use his artistic talents to create what they wanted.

He would even use his artistic talents to make them a cake for a birthday or other event, just not for a gay wedding.

 

[Legion]

As do I.

So you say. ™

 

[Legion]

look at that. the little pussy comes out of hiding to engage in mindless rhetoric while ignoring issues of substance and intellect

There's nothing "little" about her.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

It doesn't matter if religion is irrational since it has constitutional protections.

Does that mean if a person wanted a cake with anti-black, anti-gay, pro-Nazi, pro-Klan, or pro-pedophile messages the baker would be required to take their money and make their cake? Or that Jehovah's Witness children can be required to stand and pledge allegiance since it is based on their irrational superstitious religious beliefs?

Looks like the current JPP resident liberals have no problem in forcing people to do what ever liberals want; but I guarantee you that if a similar situation was reversed and it was a liberal business denying service to someone, the liberals would stand up in support.

You know, like:
A server refusing to serve a policeman
A business asking someone wearing a MAGA hat or shirt to leave
A business refusing to serve anyone wearing club colors
etc
etc

 

[christiefan915]

There's nothing "little" about her.

Hahaha. I need to put those 10# back on.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

He would even use his artistic talents to make them a cake for a birthday or other event, just not for a gay wedding.

AND THAT'S A FUCKING FACT, which the brain dead spineless liberals refuse to acknowledge or admit.
THANKS