Supreme Court rules businesses can refuse service to LGBTQ+ customers

[Nomad]

^^ Said a limp dicked fatty who hasn't gotten laid in decades.

Says the rump ranger who dresses up like a cheerleader and takes it up the chute and the closest thing to the inside of a vagina he's ever experienced, was some hairy dude's greased up rectum.

 

[Diesel]

Says the rump ranger who dresses up like a cheerleader and takes it up the chute and the closest thing to the inside of a vagina he's ever experienced, was some hairy dude's greased up rectum.

Like a scripted soap opera. Predictable. Poorly acted. Pointless. Any time I rake one of you losers over the coals you become a sobbing mess sputtering graphic and wrong assumptions about my sex life. You little closet queers are so exhausting. I am part of the last generation that felt an existential imperative to hide my sexuality, but even I (and my LGBTQ peers) came out about 20 years ago. Your self loathing is no good reason to type your sexual fantasies.

 

[Nomad]

Like a scripted soap opera. Predictable. Poorly acted. Pointless. Any time I rake one of you losers over the coals you become a sobbing mess sputtering graphic and wrong assumptions about my sex life. You little closet queers are so exhausting. I am part of the last generation that felt an existential imperative to hide my sexuality, but even I (and my LGBTQ peers) came out about 20 years ago. Your self loathing is no good reason to type your sexual fantasies.

Keep telling yourself that, Shaniqua.

The only raking you've ever done was on the county work farm, tranny boy.

 

[Diesel]

Keep telling yourself that, Shaniqua.

The only raking you've ever done was on the county work farm, tranny boy.

Yet another repressed conservative and pitiful loser ^

 

[Lionfish]

Like a scripted soap opera. Predictable. Poorly acted. Pointless. Any time I rake one of you losers over the coals you become a sobbing mess sputtering graphic and wrong assumptions about my sex life. You little closet queers are so exhausting. I am part of the last generation that felt an existential imperative to hide my sexuality, but even I (and my LGBTQ peers) came out about 20 years ago. Your self loathing is no good reason to type your sexual fantasies.

You seem way overly invested in this thread. If you want a cake and you suspect the owner has a political or personal position you don't like, go in and ask for it, don't go in dressed like you are trying out for a clown position n a circus, and if you are refused stop with the hissy fits and find another baker. There are dozens of gay bakeries in every city in America.
Holy shit, this is much ado about nothing. You want to be gay, be friggin gay, and stop shouting it to the world. This thread is much like joe wet panties and his EV fetish. He mad a decision and now EVERYBODY has to kiss his ass and tell him what a good boy he is.

 

[Lionfish]

You queers and fags really need to pull yourselves up by your panty hose and stop all this wallowing. Its unbecoming behavior,.......even for a fag.

You use much stronger words than I but, you hit the nail directly on the head. I might add, if you ride your bicycle naked down a public street in front of children, you just might have to have your spokes replaced because of that stick that somehow got stuck in your wheel.

 

[Damocles]

I'll respect business owners more if they also refuse to serve adulterers and liars.

I suspect that if a customer asked this web designer to make them a cheatwithme dot com website for folks to cheat on spouses the answer would have been the same. The difference would be that nobody would have tried to sue over it to force them to make the website, they just would have asked a different web designer to make the site.

 

[Damocles]

It is speech


Ok cool...its my religious belief that I dont speak to Gays & Trans

You'd have to stop posting here then. I suspect that some users are gay and maybe even trans... <Best Seinfeld Impression: "Not that there's anything wrong with that!">

 

[Diesel]

You seem way overly invested in this thread. If you want a cake and you suspect the owner has a political or personal position you don't like, go in and ask for it, don't go in dressed like you are trying out for a clown position n a circus, and if you are refused stop with the hissy fits and find another baker. There are dozens of gay bakeries in every city in America.
Holy shit, this is much ado about nothing. You want to be gay, be friggin gay, and stop shouting it to the world. This thread is much like joe wet panties and his EV fetish. He mad a decision and now EVERYBODY has to kiss his ass and tell him what a good boy he is.

You seem like a typical idiot American who doesn't understand the world. What if there is no "gay bakery" -- whatever the fuck that means? Better yet, what if there are no "gay gas stations" and "gay grocery stores" and "gay internet service providers"? Your position is that people who don't "agree with" gay people (and let's be very clear: every single person like that is a shit person who should not be allowed to own a business that exchanges in the public markets) should be allowed to preclude LGBTQ people from full participation in an equal society.

For that, you un-American asshole, you can go fuck yourself.

 

[QP!]

The standing thing is puzzling to me. How does the court take case that doesn't yet exist. This one is above my legal paygrade.

This Supreme Court has CERTAIN cases they are eager to reverse prior precedent on. The Trump appointees simply lied when, one by one, they said they follow Stare decisis , and believe that later courts cannot just say 'our opinions diverge from prior courts and thus we are reversing this law'. They understand the danger of each change in the court simply saying 'we have ideologically different beliefs and thus will reverse these laws' and the premise of Stare decisis is that you must hold over rulings to a higher standard. The SC justices are supposed to ask the question 'was there an error in law... and not just a different opinion on how the law should apply'.

This SC has set the stage that every court that follows the day it changes should do what Clarence Thomas disgustingly did in making a call out for cases he wanted to over turn.


They also wrongly gave the Red States standing to sue saying 'changing the student loans could cost us revenue' as the reason for the 'harm'. By that logic you would be hard pressed to find anything that the Federal gov't that does not impact State revenues in some way. Prior courts would have never stretched to give standing to such specious reasoning.

This is captured Court that is a political arm of the Federalist Society. They ONLY proceeded to the bench because the Federalist Society put them on an exclusive list that the Republican Senators and POTUS will ONLY choose from. SO every conservative leaning judge in any part of the system is aware that they will NEVER advance in their careers to higher courts, if they are not giving Federalist issues the rulings they want. They are also deliberately pushing younger and DUMBER justices in to the system (Aileen Cannon, Matthew Kacsmaryk,etc) because the more 'intellectual' conservatives they have pushed in the past, can be swayed by good arguments and end up voting with Liberal justices. Dumb ideologues tend to not be swayed by nuances and good arguments, as they do not understand them, so they stick to ideology.

 

[Lionfish]

You seem like a typical idiot American who doesn't understand the world. What if there is no "gay bakery" -- whatever the fuck that means? Better yet, what if there are no "gay gas stations" and "gay grocery stores" and "gay internet service providers"? Your position is that people who don't "agree with" gay people (and let's be very clear: every single person like that is a shit person who should not be allowed to own a business that exchanges in the public markets) should be allowed to preclude LGBTQ people from full participation in an equal society.

For that, you un-American asshole, you can go fuck yourself.

If I were you, I would move to Yemen where gays are welcomed.

 

[QP!]

It is very necessary if the Dem's get the POTUS and Senate again in 2024, with enough power to do meaningful SC reform that they add at least 4 more justices to honor the prior precedent of adding new SC members to keep pace with the growth of new Circuit Court of Appeals.

Historically new members of the SC were added as new Circuit Courts were added so each would have their own supervising Justice. Now a few Justices are forced to take on two at a time when the SC case load (accepted and turned away) are at all time highs.

Adding 4 new Justices, is a way to get back to precedent and to also rebalance this court, from the very dishonest practices of the GOP breaking all prior precedent and applying dishonest practices.

 

[Diesel]

If I were you, I would move to Yemen where gays are welcomed.

Why don't you move to Yemen, too, and see how that goes?

What a miserable, stupid fuck you are. Shut up.

 

[Lionfish]

 

[Concart]

You'd have to stop posting here then. I suspect that some users are gay and maybe even trans... <Best Seinfeld Impression: "Not that there's anything wrong with that!">

There was no web design business and there was no gay customer. It was a made up case.

 

[Concart]

I suspect that if a customer asked this web designer to make them a cheatwithme dot com website for folks to cheat on spouses the answer would have been the same. The difference would be that nobody would have tried to sue over it to force them to make the website, they just would have asked a different web designer to make the site.

The difference is that that adulterers are not a protected class so of course anyone can deny service on that basis. So you are now okay with a business denying service on the basis of race, gender, or religious belief? You think that’s okay? I don’t.

 

[Diesel]

There was no web design business and there was no gay customer. It was a made up case.

And the alt reich Court lapped it up like thirsty kittens.

 

[Diesel]

The difference is that that adulterers are not a protected class so of course anyone can deny service on that basis. So you are now okay with a business denying service on the basis of race, gender, or religious belief? You think that’s okay? I don’t.

That's exactly what they're saying. "We want to pretend that race and sexual orientation don't exist because that makes our own existence and unearned privilege easier."

 

[zymurgy]

'No Gays Allowed' on front door of a business

that would be a clear violation.

If you are an artist, you can refuse to paint a picture for a gay person if the picture they request violates your beliefs

You can't refuse because he is gay though - you obviously misunderstand the ruling here. You can discriminate against the service, not against the individual

 

[Nordberg]

This is the most "activist" court in history. They reach for cases that they want to rule on so they can change America to what they want. This case is not real. The woman who complained did not have a web design business. The guy she said she refused service to is not gay. He is married for 15 years. He has a kid and IS a web designer. This case will cause legal turmoil as more comes out. Biden has to add 4 seats to the court. We have judges who are bought off and others who lied like hell to get on the court.