Supreme Court rules against affirmative action.

1688140235922-png.1317368
 
Products of poor educational systems, are already behind in academics and opportunities. We have allowed schools in poor neighborhoods to decay. Many who got into college due to affirmative action have become huge successes, like Justice Thomas for example. Killing Affirmative Action is dooming lots of people with poor backgrounds from escaping. Blacks and Latinos are equal to whites in their ability to think and create. They have far fewer opportunities. The Roberts court locked that in.
 
Products of poor educational systems, are already behind in academics and opportunities. We have allowed schools in poor neighborhoods to decay. Many who got into college due to affirmative action have become huge successes, like Justice Thomas for example. Killing Affirmative Action is dooming lots of people with poor backgrounds from escaping. Blacks and Latinos are equal to whites in their ability to think and create. They have far fewer opportunities. The Roberts court locked that in.

Better to fix the schools rather than "lock the barn door after the horses have run off".
 
Products of poor educational systems, are already behind in academics and opportunities. We have allowed schools in poor neighborhoods to decay. Many who got into college due to affirmative action have become huge successes, like Justice Thomas for example. Killing Affirmative Action is dooming lots of people with poor backgrounds from escaping. Blacks and Latinos are equal to whites in their ability to think and create. They have far fewer opportunities. The Roberts court locked that in.

It’s being said in a different way but this type of thought is really not much different than TDAK. You think black people aren’t capable of competing on their own merit and are basically inferior. Really, black people cant get into any of the hundreds of Universities in this country without AA? That’s what you are saying above. (And out of curiously why leave out Asians since they are actually the ones being discriminated against?)
 
It’s being said in a different way but this type of thought is really not much different than TDAK. You think black people aren’t capable of competing on their own merit and are basically inferior. Really, black people cant get into any of the hundreds of Universities in this country without AA? That’s what you are saying above. (And out of curiously why leave out Asians since they are actually the ones being discriminated against?)

While I understand and agree with the problem, AA isn't the answer for the reasons you alluded: discrimination against Asians, institutionalized racial bias and a violation of the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause.

We need something better. IMO, that starts with leveling the playing field in K-12 public schools.
 
It’s being said in a different way but this type of thought is really not much different than TDAK. You think black people aren’t capable of competing on their own merit and are basically inferior. Really, black people cant get into any of the hundreds of Universities in this country without AA? That’s what you are saying above. (And out of curiously why leave out Asians since they are actually the ones being discriminated against?)

Your reading comprehension is sorely lacking.
 
Better to fix the schools rather than "lock the barn door after the horses have run off".

That is not going to happen. Reality intrudes. We have millions of people living lives of desperation. They have very little chance to escape from a life that did not create.
 
Supreme Court rules against affirmative action. Chief Justice Roberts writes the majority decision for the six conservative justices: "Harvard’s and UNC’s admissions programs violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

https://www.msnbc.com/ana-cabrera-r...ive-action-in-college-admissions-185841221772

BOOM

That is a FAKE NEWS headline. They didn't rule "against" anything. They merely stated that creating arbitrary discriminatory entrance requirements violates the law.
 
Your reading comprehension is sorely lacking.

No, I read perfectly clearly what you said. Maybe you don't understand how AA works. It's basically about getting middle class black with lower grades and tests scores into elite schools. Because one doesn't get into (pick an elite school) Yale doesn't mean they can't go to college. Because a poor kid doesn't get into (pick an elite school) Yale and goes to another college doesn't mean they are doomed to a life of poverty and can't escape their current circumstances. Why do we even have hundreds of Universities then if they do nothing to help poor (or any) people better their lives? It's elite college or bust is your point.
 
That is not going to happen. Reality intrudes. We have millions of people living lives of desperation. They have very little chance to escape from a life that did not create.

So give up? Throw money into the "free college" hole and call it a day?
 
Uncle Thomas benefitted from affirmative action too?!! Go figure?!!

Sotomayor, who has praised Thomas, described their differences as philosophical.

The Supreme Court's most senior conservative, Justice Clarence Thomas, and its most senior liberal, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, both rose from humble beginnings to join the elite ranks of Yale Law School -- and both have publicly credited race-based affirmative action initiatives with helping them get there.

But both justices have now staked out starkly opposite positions on whether the policy should be allowed to continue, facing off in a pair of blockbuster cases that will be decided this month and address the future of race in college admissions.

"Even as these people have very similar experiences across the board, the way that they react to them is radically different," said Leah Wright Rigueur, an associate professor of history at Johns Hopkins University who specializes in race, politics and civil rights.

"Both had radicalizing experiences with racism and discrimination, and if it's true that those radicalizing experiences can push someone to the left, then it's also true that those radicalized experiences can push someone to the right," she said.
The justices' deeply personal experiences will share the spotlight when the court's latest written opinions on affirmative action are handed down.

"Their positions are really the epitome of the nuanced argument that we've been having around affirmative action for decades in this country," said Sarah Isgur, an ABC News legal contributor and former Justice Department attorney.

In many ways, Sotomayor and Thomas' disagreement mirrors public opinion, Isgur said, with polls showing a strong majority of Americans both supporting the promotion of diversity on college campuses while also opposing explicit consideration of the race of student applicants.

"The divide is why states like California and Michigan -- which are not red states -- have banned affirmative action many years ago now," Isgur added. "It's because both sides make compelling points."

Thomas, the court's only Black man, grew up poor in still-segregated rural Georgia before getting accepted to Yale Law School in 1971.

"The effort on the part of Yale during my years there was to reach out and open its doors to minorities whom it felt were qualified," Thomas testified during his 1991 Senate confirmation hearing, "and I took them at their word on that, and I have advocated that very kind of affirmative action."

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/jus...mative-action-divide-future/story?id=99838065



:lolup: The definition of stupid and ignorant.
 
Another myth

“Rating: This claim is FALSE. Affirmative Action does not hurt Asian Americans’ chances of attending college. In fact, according to a study released by the U.S. Department of Education, Asians have the highest college enrollment rate among all ethnic groups, at 59%. And in fact, if affirmative action was outlawed, it would hurt Asian Americans’ chance of getting into college.”

https://vietfactcheck.org/2022/06/27/does-affirmative-action-hurt-asian-americans/amp/

Race based entrance requirements hurt blacks the most.

A "Dubious Expediency": How Race-Preferential Admissions Policies on Campus Hurt Minority Students

Unfortunately, a student whose entering academic credentials are well below those of the average student in a particular school will likely earn grades to match. Even former Princeton President William G. Bowen and former Harvard President Derek Bok, who were pioneers in formulating affirmative action policies, admit that the credentials gap has serious consequences.

https://www.heritage.org/civil-righ...-preferential-admissions-policies-campus-hurt
 
Of course, Kagan, sotomayor and Jackson, who always vote against the Constitution, voted for racial discrimination against Asians and whites.

Jackson is the worst and least qualified dimwit to ever sit on the court.

“With let-them-eat-cake obliviousness, today, the majority pulls the ripcord and announces ‘colorblindness for all’ by legal fiat,”

“And having so detached itself from this country’s actual past and present experiences, the Court has now been lured into interfering with the crucial work that UNC and other institutions of higher learning are doing to solve America’s real-world problems. No one benefits from ignorance.”

“But deeming race irrelevant in law does not make it so in life,”


Just a few of the moronic race hustling things she said in her dissent.
 
no.
it's at most universities.
well, used to be...

Many (most?) universities want more students than they have applicants; therefore, they don't need to reject anybody and take almost all applicants. Many, especially community colleges, are open admissions.

The affirmative action applies primarily to faculty and staff.
 
Back
Top