Supreme Court owes Americans explanations

A

archives

Verified User

“Trump wins big on the Supreme Court's shadow docket"​

“The Supreme Court has handed President Trump a slew of major victories through an abbreviated process that doesn't require full-fledged briefings and arguments — and will likely continue to do so”


The Supreme Court is suppose to offer public explanation for the legal basis of their decisions

Emergency decisions are traditionally rare, yet this Court seems eager to openly promote Trump’s agenda and without any explanation or logic.

Trump administration has applied 21 times since January. President Bush and President Obama averaged one emergency request every two years; Trump averages nearly one a week. Trump has already brought more emergency appeals to the high court than former President Biden did during his four years in office

I do think the Founding Fathers created the Judiciary Branch as major component of the Constitution’s Checks and Balances and not as a gofer for the Chief Executive

Welcome to MAGA America
 
archives said:

“Trump wins big on the Supreme Court's shadow docket"​

“The Supreme Court has handed President Trump a slew of major victories through an abbreviated process that doesn't require full-fledged briefings and arguments — and will likely continue to do so”


The Supreme Court is suppose to offer public explanation for the legal basis of their decisions

Emergency decisions are traditionally rare, yet this Court seems eager to openly promote Trump’s agenda and without any explanation or logic.

Trump administration has applied 21 times since January. President Bush and President Obama averaged one emergency request every two years; Trump averages nearly one a week. Trump has already brought more emergency appeals to the high court than former President Biden did during his four years in office

I do think the Founding Fathers created the Judiciary Branch as major component of the Constitution’s Checks and Balances and not as a gofer for the Chief Executive

Welcome to MAGA America
Click to expand...
The supreme court called,........they said tell anchovies to go fuck himself. :cool:
 
archives said:
And this is the MAGA lemming ^ who says he loves the Constitution
Click to expand...
I do love the constitution and I am following it by going along with the supreme courts rulings. Meanwhile on THE LEFT we had people camping outside of justices homes screaming threats and profanities trying to influence their decisions by using violent rhetoric. Scumbags.
 
There are legal remedies to every situation. The supreme court is the highest court in the land,....the buck stops there. NOTHING is infallible,....not even our constitution.
 
Stone said:
There are legal remedies to every situation. The supreme court is the highest court in the land,....the buck stops there. NOTHING is infallible,....not even our constitution.
Click to expand...
besides not answering my question, are you sure that the buck stops at SCOTUS? Isn't there a higher authority on the Constitution above SCOTUS?
 
I know Congress KIND OF can by passing new laws to counteract a SC ruling,...but its a difficult process. Pretty sure its a rarity.
 
Stone said:
Got me....WE THE PEOPLE?? I'm not a legal scholar and certainly not up on Constitutional law....LOL
Click to expand...
well, as an example, the Constitution gives no power or authority to the federal government to regulate marijuana..yet the government simply says that they have that power...............same with firearms. A very simple remedy is jury nullification. Any act that SCOTUS says is constitutional can simply be ignored with acquittals or mistrials.
 
martin said:
Article III, if you want to call it an "entity".
Click to expand...
Article 3 does not give scotus sole authority over the constitution. It is the absolute height of stupidity to believe that the framers would create a new central government with restricted and limited powers, then hand the power to define those restrictions and limits to that very government after having just won their independence from their previous government
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top