Supercandy afraid of reality puts those who speak truth on Ignore...zygote not child!

I didn't see the question because I have Bijou on ignore. But hence to say my argument has always been one of conception. Why do I need take responsibility for the result of an act that I have no say in approving?

Bijou asked, "Why do you want to force the birth of innocent children to mothers who don't want them? What kind of life do you want to force on these innocent children, j-mac?"

So you're saying you don't want to force women to bear children?
 
Do you believe that equals the 1.2 million per year?

There are abuse problems, as well. If a woman wants an abortion it means she doesn't want a child. Why would anyone want to bring a child into that situation? It doesn't make sense. Even the most loving of parents are pushed to their breaking point raising children. It's the most difficult task anyone can take on and nothing good can come from forcing someone to do so.
 
I think it's too much of an obnoxious interference by the government to tell her to give up nine months of her life if she chooses not to. It is a direct violation of her reproductive rights. No one but the mother has the right to determine when she chooses to have a child.

and I think its too much of an obnoxious interference in the life of a child to stick a scalpel in it's brain......
 
It did not have an exception for the mother's health.

Partial-birth abortion bans.

how many times to I have to point to it before you simpletons read it?....
The bill allowed the exception in the case if "the partial-birth abortion was necessary to save the life of the woman upon whom it was performed
from the link in your post....

and just in case you try to pretend the 97 act didn't.....here's the text of the act, including this....
This paragraph shall not apply to a partial-birth abortion that is necessary to save the life of a mother whose life is endangered by a physical disorder, illness, or injury.
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/105/hr1122/text

this makes you the third person who looks foolish for denying the truth........
 
Are you aware that it takes nine months to gestate a child? Some women, for myriad reasons, are unwilling to make the sacrifice pregnancy demands, unless they're keeping the child. You don't have to agree with, or approve of, the women for whom the choice to abort is the most practical; furthermore, it's none of your business.

42 weeks, actually. If you do it right. Usually a bit more than 9 months.
 
Once more for the retards:

once more for the retards...."This paragraph shall not apply to a partial-birth abortion that is necessary to save the life of a mother whose life is endangered by a physical disorder, illness, or injury."....lying fucking liberals everywhere you turn....
 
shucks no....I thought it took 35 minutes.....if a woman isn't prepared to spend nine months of her life gestating the child she conceived, she ought not be conceiving children......

Thanks for sharing your completely irrelevant opinion. It's none of your business what any woman is 'prepared' to do.
 
Because prospective adopters don't want children from alcoholics and drug addicts because the child has a good chance of suffering from related illnesses.

actually, I have good friends who fostered, then adopted a baby that was born with a heroin addiction....she is a nurse and has two children of her own now.....
 
and you forget there are better ways to handle the situation than to kill the child.....

Not according to some women - they get to choose when to bear a child and if they decide the timing is wrong for their unplanned pregnancy, they'll abort. That's the purpose of abortion. And it's entirely up to the mother, which means it doesn't matter how much you don't like it.
 
Back
Top