STUNNING charge from Wasserman Schultz - Obama admin allowed the DNC hacking

archives said:
"Donald Trump’s election win is largely influenced by Russian hacking," to deny that fact would mean you are also saying the WikiLeaks input plus barrage of fake news stories had zero impact on the election.

If such was the case, then the six month campaign by the right wing media was in error since those are the elements they focused on 24/7, even the President admitted their role in his campaign

Click to expand...

It was on Obama's watch and he did squat. He kept quiet because he figured Hillary would have a landslide win. Surprise!!!!
 
archives said:
"Donald Trump’s election win is largely influenced by Russian hacking," to deny that fact would mean you are also saying the WikiLeaks input plus barrage of fake news stories had zero impact on the election.

If such was the case, then the six month campaign by the right wing media was in error since those are the elements they focused on 24/7, even the President admitted their role in his campaign

Click to expand...

Dear moron; Trump stated that he loved wikileaks because they exposed the DNC corrupt treatment of Sanders in the nomination process. Do you actually walk around with your hands over your eyes and ears?

The Trump campaign had NOTHING to do with the hacks, and Wasserman herself impugns the Obama administration for doing NOTHING. They didn't even have the gall to call them and tell them they were being hacked.

Do you idiots on the left think Obama wanted Trump to win now? Is Wasserman lying? Is Jeh Johnson lying? Is Obama just an incompetent boob? Why YES to all of the above.

Dunce. I have never seen so many liberals being willfully stupid. It's one of the gifts of a Trump Presidency.
 
Stretch said:
It was on Obama's watch and he did squat. He kept quiet because he figured Hillary would have a landslide win. Surprise!!!!
Click to expand...

Liberals on this forum are too stupid to comprehend the OBVIOUS. :rofl2:

But Wasserman is slapping them with the OBVIOUS now. :rofl2:
 
Althea said:
Rumors? LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Click to expand...

Yes; will you still be laughing when the investigation turns up proof of the Obama Administrations corruption and incompetence? That was rhetorical; you're too ignorant and stupid to comprehend the OBVOIUS.
 
anatta said:
Consider the declassified summary of the Intelligence Community’s assessment of “Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent US Elections.”

The DNC breaches feature prominently in that summary but, more to the point, the primary rationale readers are given for why they should believe that the Russian government meddled in the U.S. election is because the FBI, CIA, and NSA believe that to be the case. We are given very little actual detail about what happened or how the incidents were traced to Russia specifically, while we are treated to numerous statements along the lines of: “We assess with high confidence that Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the US presidential election” or “We further assess Putin and the Russian Government developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump. We have high confidence in these judgments.”

Of course, there are many reasons the Intelligence Community might have decided not to reveal any actual evidence for these claims. But in the absence of that evidence, whether or not you believe their conclusions rests entirely on your confidence in the judgment and investigative abilities of the FBI, CIA, and NSA. And if the evidence that they’ve used to level major accusations at a foreign government comes not from agencies of the U.S. government or direct law enforcement investigations, but rather from private sector firms like CrowdStrike, then the “high confidence” of the government counts for very little. The DNC breach is not the only incident attributed to Russia in the Intelligence assessment summary and it’s likely that some of the others were directly investigated by the government. But even so, this conflation of government- and industry-gathered evidence without clear distinctions makes it harder to take the agencies’ assessments at face value.
http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_t...nc_hack_because_it_relied_on_crowdstrike.html

SLATE Magazine
Click to expand...

All of the DNC accusations, pretty much boil down to "Trump Colluded With Russia - believe us; because we're the DNC".
 
archives said:
Explains it all, "the war is on," conservatives just have to have their existential threat, without their melodrama with good guys and bad guys the world doesn't make sense to them. Fortunately, reality is grey, not the dichotomy they seem to require

Nobody cares about last year's election, we have a new President and it is his regime now
Click to expand...

Morons on the left declared war on this President and the voters who elected him; now their chickens are coming home to roost. Cry snowflake, CRY! :rofl2:
 
Truth Detector said:
We aren't looking for an answer you dullard; we KNOW the answer. It's whiny little low information losers like you who cannot comprehend the OBVIOUS and gleefully predict a Trump assassination or Impeachment. Dunce.
Click to expand...

Funny, now we got a conservative who is now crying about an election their man won, still looking for the bogeyman

And as far as "Trump assassination," that topic is easy to ping pong

"An adviser to President Donald Trump's campaign who called for Hillary Clinton to be shot is visiting the White House."

http://www.businessinsider.com/ap-trump-adviser-who-advocated-violence-visits-white-house-2017-6

Got anything else?
 
Truth Detector said:
You cannot make this stuff up; and she goes after Johnson for even suggesting that they did. PRICELESS :rofl2:
Click to expand...
Wasserman Schulz is a known corrupt liar.
Clapper is a known liar
Brennan is a known liar
Comey is a drama queen with Deep State paranoia of "da Russian are comin to America"
( his actual words in testimony)

The FBI never looked at the evidence!

The declassified assessment is full of declarative with little or no factual references.

It's complete bullshit.
It would never hold up in a court of law -yet we are determining national policy
and investigating a presidential administration on this flimsy, undocumented "evidence"
 
archives said:
Funny, now we got a conservative who is now crying about an election their man won, still looking for the bogeyman

And as far as "Trump assassination," that topic is easy to ping pong

"An adviser to President Donald Trump's campaign who called for Hillary Clinton to be shot is visiting the White House."

http://www.businessinsider.com/ap-trump-adviser-who-advocated-violence-visits-white-house-2017-6

Got anything else?
Click to expand...

Your attempts at the "six degrees of separation" are missing a few links.
 
Truth Detector said:
Dear moron; Trump stated that he loved wikileaks because they exposed the DNC corrupt treatment of Sanders in the nomination process. Do you actually walk around with your hands over your eyes and ears?

The Trump campaign had NOTHING to do with the hacks, and Wasserman herself impugns the Obama administration for doing NOTHING. They didn't even have the gall to call them and tell them they were being hacked.

Do you idiots on the left think Obama wanted Trump to win now? Is Wasserman lying? Is Jeh Johnson lying? Is Obama just an incompetent boob? Why YES to all of the above.

Dunce. I have never seen so many liberals being willfully stupid. It's one of the gifts of a Trump Presidency.
Click to expand...

Get real, Trump loved WikiLeaks because it gave him campaign ammunition that he and the right wing media used relentlessy, even you couldn't turn on your favorite radio demogogue and not hear their interpretation of what the latest Email supposedly exposed

Trump loves WikiLeaks because of the unfair treatment of Sanders, too funny
 
archives said:
Get real, Trump loved WikiLeaks because it gave him campaign ammunition that he and the right wing media used relentlessy, even you couldn't turn on your favorite radio demogogue and not hear their interpretation of what the latest Email supposedly exposed

Trump loves WikiLeaks because of the unfair treatment of Sanders, too funny
Click to expand...

Was anything in those WikiLeaks false??
 
archives said:
Who cares, last years news, I realize it ain't easy defending the President nor his policies, if you can figure out exactly what his policies are, but you got to get over your obsession with Hillary, it's 2017, last year's talk radio scapegoats aren't relevant, nobody cares
Click to expand...

Sorry. Not last years news. The "hack" into the DNC servers are at the heart of all of the Russian collusion allegations. Sorry. We warned you that pushing this ginned up story would have unintended consequences for you lefties. Now the chickens have come home to roost.
 
Truth Detector said:
...and now, the DNC has claimed that the Obama Admin knew of the hacking and did NOTHING. Who are the liars? One has to wonder..... ;)
Click to expand...

You really are uninformed, or, as your fat boy puts it, "low information," it was your Donald that claimed the Obama did nothing about the hacking;

"Just out: The Obama Administration knew far in advance of November 8th about election meddling by Russia. Did nothing about it. WHY?
8:43 PM - 23 Jun 2017" - Trump

And did you notice by doing such he is acknowledging Russian interference, try to keep up
 
Alice in Liberaland said:
Sorry. Not last years news. The "hack" into the DNC servers are at the heart of all of the Russian collusion allegations. Sorry. We warned you that pushing this ginned up story would have unintended consequences for you lefties. Now the chickens have come home to roost.
Click to expand...

Interesting, now show us exactly how the "the hack into the DNC servers are at the heart of all of the Russian collusion allegation"

We'll wait
 
archives said:
Funny, now we got a conservative who is now crying about an election their man won, still looking for the bogeyman

And as far as "Trump assassination," that topic is easy to ping pong

"An adviser to President Donald Trump's campaign who called for Hillary Clinton to be shot is visiting the White House."

http://www.businessinsider.com/ap-trump-adviser-who-advocated-violence-visits-white-house-2017-6

Got anything else?
Click to expand...

Dear moron; the ONLY one's crying are you leftist snowflakes who stupidly think you can defy the American people and rescind an election based on specious fgalse claims.

I do wish you had a brain scarecrow. :rofl2:
 
archives said:
Get real, Trump loved WikiLeaks because it gave him campaign ammunition that he and the right wing media used relentlessy, even you couldn't turn on your favorite radio demogogue and not hear their interpretation of what the latest Email supposedly exposed

Trump loves WikiLeaks because of the unfair treatment of Sanders, too funny
Click to expand...

Trump loving wikileaks exposure of DNC corruption is not a crime scarecrow; I do wish you had a brain....but then, you wouldn't be a willful shill for the Party of the Jackass. :rofl2:
 
Alice in Liberaland said:
Sorry. Not last years news. The "hack" into the DNC servers are at the heart of all of the Russian collusion allegations. Sorry. We warned you that pushing this ginned up story would have unintended consequences for you lefties. Now the chickens have come home to roost.
Click to expand...

^Gets it. Too bad scarecrow is lacking the brains it takes to comprehend that much. LOL
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top