Study Suggests That Wimpier Men Hold Liberal Views

I also have a border/aussie tri color and a merle ( with orange in him too , I call him my calico dog) cattle dog /aussie
 
Darla said:
Both can come in handy, but I don't believe there is a political affiliation and I know for a fact that there are plenty of muscle heads who are quite intelligent...regardless of what some flabby men might like to believe!
Click to expand...


Well said, you never cease to surprise.
 
Rana said:
No, it doesn't, why should she care about a falsehood?
Click to expand...

5'5, wear a size 10, very well proportioned hour glass shape, no apple, no pear, don't get any complaints...other than from jealous bitches on the internet! I did gain weight when I quit smoking and it took me two years to get it off, but other than that, nope.
 
Rana said:
No, it doesn't, why should she care about a falsehood?
Click to expand...

Darla said:
5'5, wear a size 10, very well proportioned hour glass shape, no apple, no pear, don't get any complaints...other than from jealous bitches on the internet! I did gain weight when I quit smoking and it took me two years to get it off, but other than that, nope.
Click to expand...

Opps...my bad....I had to go back and check...I thought he was responding to desh....sorry about the mix up....
 
Your headline disagrees with the information presented. There seems to be a correlation between wealth, upper body strength and opposition to redistribution and also a correlation between not wealthy, upper body strength and support of redistribution.

Somehow I don't think racistx is wealthy, so he must be wimpy.
 
Professor Baxter said:
Your headline disagrees with the information presented. There seems to be a correlation between wealth, upper body strength and opposition to redistribution and also a correlation between not wealthy, upper body strength and support of redistribution.

Somehow I don't think racistx is wealthy, so he must be wimpy.
Click to expand...


How does the headline disagree with the info presented? This is the headline of the article.

Men who are physically strong are more likely to have right wing political views
 
cawacko said:
How does the headline disagree with the info presented? This is the headline of the article.

Men who are physically strong are more likely to have right wing political views
Click to expand...

Well, I was talking about racistx's headline but that one is wrong too. Read the article.

In line with their hypotheses, the data revealed that wealthy men with high upper-body strength were less likely to support redistribution, while less wealthy men of the same strength were more likely to support it.

RacistX is a poor little weakling.
 
I have to admit to having a fondness for men who can lift heavy things. I know it's very shallow and I'm sorry for this. I feel ashamed but I can't help it.
 
Professor Baxter said:
Well, I was talking about racistx's headline but that one is wrong too. Read the article.

In line with their hypotheses, the data revealed that wealthy men with high upper-body strength were less likely to support redistribution, while less wealthy men of the same strength were more likely to support it.

RacistX is a poor little weakling.
Click to expand...

The headline of the OP says "Study suggests that wimpier men hold liberal views"

The first line of the article says "Men who are physically strong are more likely to take a right wing political stance, while weaker men are inclined to support the welfare state, according to a new study."

I'm not seeing how the headline of this thread is disagreeing with what the article states.
 
Darla said:
I have to admit to having a fondness for men who can lift heavy things. I know it's very shallow and I'm sorry for this. I feel ashamed but I can't help it.
Click to expand...

I like muscle, but if they are a Moose or Bubba, well, a few brains are necessary, too.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top