Study finds Climate Change is a NATURAL occurrence - Liberals Shocked & Dismayed

Climate Computer models are NOT scientific empirical data. :palm:

Sea level rise, Temperature rise, warming oceans, shrinking ice sheets, declining Arctic sea ice, glacier retreat, repeating weather extremes, increasing atmospheric CO2 levels, and Ocean acidification aren't "climate computer models"

Got anything else, rather, did the fat guy give you anything else?
 
Sure they have, but not at such an accelerated rate that also matches the rise of atmospheric CO2 levels, it's common sense

Prove it is accelerated. Looking at the chart, it looks quite normal. One could also argue there was acceleration in the past.

Your comment is weak, but at least you admit there has been natural climate change for thousands of years.
 
Sea level rise, Temperature rise, warming oceans, shrinking ice sheets, declining Arctic sea ice, glacier retreat, repeating weather extremes, increasing atmospheric CO2 levels, and Ocean acidification aren't "climate computer models"

Got anything else, rather, did the fat guy give you anything else?

The Little Ice Age ended in 1800. What did you think would happen when an Ice Age ends. :palm:

The Ocean is NOT acidic. Don't doubt me.

Higher temps cause higher CO2 levels as proved by the Vostok Ice core data I posted in the OP. It has never lead to a fireball Earth.

1816 was known as the year without a Summer. You have not seen extreme weather.

Most of North America was covered in Ice sheets and Sea Levels were 400 ft. lower not that long ago. :palm:
 
Last edited:
The Little Ice Age ended in 1800. What did you think would happen when an Ice Age ends. :palm:

The Ocean is NOT acidic. Don't doubt me.

Higher temps cause higher CO2 levels as proved by the Vostok Ice core data I posted in the OP.

1816 was known as the year without a Summer. You have not seen extreme weather.

Most of North America was covered in Ice sheets and Sea Levels were 400 ft. lower not that long ago. :palm:

No, no, no, I offered proof for everything I noted, you got to give us documentation, this ain't radio, just saying it doesn't make it real
 
The Little Ice Age ended in 1800. What did you think would happen when an Ice Age ends. :palm:

The Ocean is NOT acidic. Don't doubt me.

Higher temps cause higher CO2 levels as proved by the Vostok Ice core data I posted in the OP.

1816 was known as the year without a Summer. You have not seen extreme weather.

Most of North America was covered in Ice sheets and Sea Levels were 400 ft. lower not that long ago. :palm:

No, no, no, I offered proof for everything I noted, you got to give us documentation, this ain't radio, just saying it doesn't make it real
 
No, no, no, I offered proof for everything I noted, you got to give us documentation, this ain't radio, just saying it doesn't make it real

You offered proof of NATURAL climate change ... nothing more.

The fact that you are unaware of the scientific facts I posted, is typical of the average low-information leftwing brain washed Liberal.
 
Prove it is accelerated. Looking at the chart, it looks quite normal. One could also argue there was acceleration in the past.

Your comment is weak, but at least you admit there has been natural climate change for thousands of years.

No problem;

https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/carbon-dioxide/

https://www.fs.usda.gov/ccrc/education/climate-primer

https://www.acs.org/content/acs/en/climatescience/greenhousegases/industrialrevolution.html

http://www.earth-policy.org/indicators/C52/carbon_emissions_2004

It's endless
 
You offered proof of NATURAL climate change ... nothing more.

The fact that you are unaware of the scientific facts I posted, is typical of the average low-information leftwing brain washed Liberal.

So where is the proof? You delivered nothing, as I said, it ain't talk radio, just saying it doesn't mean that it is a fact, you got to back it up with documentation, you got nothing

Next
 
So where is the proof? You delivered nothing, as I said, it ain't talk radio, just saying it doesn't mean that it is a fact, you got to back it up with documentation, you got nothing

Next

Yet you have delivered nothing. Where is your proof the change is man made? You keep saying it, but that doesn't mean it is a fact.
 
So where is the proof? You delivered nothing, as I said, it ain't talk radio, just saying it doesn't mean that it is a fact, you got to back it up with documentation, you got nothing

Next

So you don't know what the pH of the Ocean is, never heard of the LIA, never heard of the "year without a Summer, don't know that sea levels were 400 ft. lower, don't know that most of North America was glaciated, and don't know that higher temps cause CO2 levels to rise?

Your lack of knowledge is shocking.

:palm:
 
Your kidding right? Google it yourself, you will find endless proof that the accelerated rate of climate change matches nearly identically with the rise of Carbon Dioxide

Here I'll even leave you with one that anyone can understand

https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/carbon-dioxide/

NASA admits that it has no idea how "water vapor" contributes to climate. Without that knowledge, any accurate "calculations" are impossible to make.


Don't doubt me.
 
Yet you have delivered nothing. Where is your proof the change is man made? You keep saying it, but that doesn't mean it is a fact.

The increased rise of Carbon Dioxide is due to man, it, as I've shown several times already, has escalated since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution till today due to human activity
 

NASA admits that it has no idea how "water vapor" contributes to climate. Without that knowledge, any accurate "calculations" are impossible to make.


Don't doubt me.

Show us where "NASA admits that it has no idea how "water vapor" contributes to climate," and how "without that knowledge any accurate calculations are impossible to make"

You keep recording things as if you really think this is talk radio
 
Back
Top