Drummie123
Verified User
MSN.com is where I got the info.
Would they lie to you?
x-2
Would they lie to you?
x-2
Stuck: Most still say Biden ‘cheating’ beat Trump
- Thread starter Drummie123
- Start date
Drummie123
Verified User
Before America became infested with those with your delusions, we gave all media sources credit for integrity.
Dean Baquet decimated journalism in America.
He isn't the only villain, but he really helped ruin journalism's reputation for integrity because, as Executive Editor of the New York Times, you set the standard. Baquet didn't maintain the Times' standard of integrity. He lowered that standard significantly.
Goodwin: Remembering when the New York Times had higher standards
By Michael Goodwin
November 26, 2019 | 10:13pm | Updated
Goodwin: Remembering when the New York Times had higher standards (https://nypost.com/2019/11/26/goodwin-remembering-when-the-new-york-times-had-higher-standards/)
Goodwin: The New York Times’ long descent from credibility
By Michael Goodwin
November 30, 2019 | 11:23pm
Goodwin: The New York Times’ long descent from credibility (https://nypost.com/2019/11/30/goodwin-the-new-york-times-long-descent-from-credibility/)
https://www.politico.com/2020-election/results/president/
The most important poll.
Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
And 40% of Americans* believe that the planet is less than 10K years old and was created by a deity. We can lead the contards to facts, but we cannot make them think.
* https://news.gallup.com/poll/261680/americans-believe-creationism.aspx
Monad Portal
Was it me?
you're losing, new world order liar people.
You are giving an assist to The Big Lie...you are proliferating it by accommodating bad faith and hurt feelings.
Because of that, Ashli Babbitt was killed.
You are correct and the OP is being dishonest, to put it nicely. This was the most recent polling I could find using "what percentage of Americans believe that Biden cheated" (Google).
"Confidence that the 2020 election was free and fair hits a high point: 65 percent of voters say the election was free and fair, including 92 percent of Democrats and 32 percent of Republicans. "
Source: https://morningconsult.com/form/tracking-voter-trust-in-elections/
MSN reported on a Rasmussen survey, but how many people were surveyed there and who was surveyed?
And was Rasmussen accurate about their election day polls? Nope.
When you have near 100 percent of Trumpies believing right-wing craziness, it does not take many in the middle to reach 51 percent. Then Rasmussen leans right, so it is a lock. Trump went to court 65 times and lost every damn one. That was his platform to prove the case and he failed every time. Every recount did the same and he had lots of those too.
So why is this belief important? Trump lost.
So why is this belief important? Trump lost.
Taft2016
Verified User
It is not "right wing craziness" to point out that the Constitution limits state election law amendments to the state legislatures.
Changes made by judges, bureaucrats, etc., produce Constitutionally invalid results in those states and no amount of name calling and foot stamping will change that.
Changes made by judges, bureaucrats, etc., produce Constitutionally invalid results in those states and no amount of name calling and foot stamping will change that.
Correct. And perception is meaningless. The election result is factual, it is not reliant on an ignorant opinion.
State legislatures can assign responsibility to whomever they want, including election boards or the Secretary of State. State courts are allowed to review and interpret legislation. All your name calling and foot stomping won't change THAT. You had your day in court. You lost. Get over it.
Taft2016
Verified User
This is almost like the liberal reaction to the birther argument. They zeroed in on whether Obama was born in the USA, when the actionable argument was whether a natural born citizen could have a parent who was not a US citizen.
The only time the US Supreme Court mentioned it, the court specified "citizen parents" (plural).
So again, they ignore the readily actionable argument and instead focus on the less actionable one.
Liberals... so transparent.
The only time the US Supreme Court mentioned it, the court specified "citizen parents" (plural).
So again, they ignore the readily actionable argument and instead focus on the less actionable one.
Liberals... so transparent.
Taft2016
Verified User
You're wrong across the board.
In New York State the legislature appointed a commission to determine if the legislature deserved a raise and would abide by their ruling. The legislature cannot delegate spending and taxing to another entity, especially one not answerable to the voters.
But more specifically, you are wrong in the premise that the legislatures delegated any of these powers and that the courts may usurp them.
You are dismissed now.
BartenderElite
Verified User
How did that birther thing turn out, anyway?
That is a pretty funny post, even the source he cites has zero to do with what he claims and the Razzy does not say what he implies
These wingers keep talking about Biden being senile, they themselves are the only ones who still believe that Trump won an election five months ago where Trump got seven million less votes than the other guy
Taft2016
Verified User
The courts determined an American citizen has no standing to question whether or not his President is Constitutionally eligible to hold the office.
Hooray, another step down into tyranny.
LOL, voting is not spending. Is that a difficult concept for you to grasp. I am 100% RIGHT in my assertion. So say the courts. So why would I give a fuck what you say? There's your sign, hillbilly.
The courts ruled that Orly Taitz was full of shit, as were the rest of you birthers. Do you ever get tired of losing? Apparently not.