STORMY ARRESTED DURING STRIP TEASE

[TrippyHippy]

Infinity has nothing to do with it.

One that wants to do something will find a way; One that doesn't will find an excuse - Confuscious

Lol your view that government resources are infinite has everything to do with it. Quoting eastern philosophers you don't understand doesn't change that. There are only so many officers on the force, and those officers cannot be in two places at once. There is only so much funding the police have to do their job. There are only so many courtrooms, and only so many prisons. When those resources are bogged down and used up catching petty criminals they are not being used to catch murderers and rapists. SIMPLE concept.

 

[CFM]

Lol your view that government resources are infinite has everything to do with it. Quoting eastern philosophers you don't understand doesn't change that. There are only so many officers on the force, and those officers cannot be in two places at once. There is only so much funding the police have to do their job. There are only so many courtrooms, and only so many prisons. When those resources are bogged down and used up catching petty criminals they are not being used to catch murderers and rapists. SIMPLE concept.

Where have I said government resources are infinite? I specifically said infinity has nothing to do with it.

Are you willing to say two rapes, murders, other crimes you'd consider police time justifiable don't occur at the same time or in such close proximity to each other that police can't be in two places at once? When that occurs, do you chastise police for failing to prevent one because they were on another?

 

[TrippyHippy]

Where have I said government resources are infinite? I specifically said infinity has nothing to do with it.

You apparently believe that since you are flippant about how those resources are allocated.

Are you willing to say two rapes, murders, other crimes you'd consider police time justifiable don't occur at the same time or in such close proximity to each other that police can't be in two places at once? When that occurs, do you chastise police for failing to prevent one because they were on another?

Irrelevant argument. Yes murderers and rapists would still slip through the cracks, that's my point. At least in this hypothetical case their limited resources were used catching other violent criminals. Instead of petty nonviolent ones.

 

[CFM]

You apparently believe that since you are flippant about how those resources are allocated.



Irrelevant argument. Yes murderers and rapists would still slip through the cracks, that's my point. At least in this hypothetical case their limited resources were used catching other violent criminals. Instead of petty nonviolent ones.

In other words, you made a claim that I said something I didn't say. There you go assuming again.

If your argument is that police waste time dealing with what you call petty things prevents them from keeping the streets safe from the "real" crimes yet those real crimes still occur even when police are addressing other "real" crimes, you argument is invalid. You move the goalpost to "slip through the cracks" when it has been 'if they'll spend their time on the things that matter, they'll be prevented.

Just admit you want them to leave you alone, despite the law being in place, so you can smoke pot and be a waste of humanity.

 

[TrippyHippy]

In other words, you made a claim that I said something I didn't say. There you go assuming again.

Either you believe police resources are infinite or you think catching someone playing bingo for 6 hours is more important than catching someone who raped or killed somebody. There is no in between, there is no cop out here. Simple either or. If police resources are finite, they can only catch so many criminals. I tend to think we should focus on catching the rapists, murderers, and pedos out there not the people technically breaking petty laws nobody cares about and that hurt nobody.

 

[Legion]

Look above. And in any discussion between me and CFM. Every time I present my opinion I'm "whining." And not going through the proper channels to change the laws.

You made the claim. As the claimant, it is incumbent upon you to provide evidence to support any allegation youmake.

 

[CFM]

Either you believe police resources are infinite or you think catching someone playing bingo for 6 hours is more important than catching someone who raped or killed somebody. There is no in between, there is no cop out here. Simple either or. If police resources are finite, they can only catch so many criminals. I tend to think we should focus on catching the rapists, murderers, and pedos out there not the people technically breaking petty laws nobody cares about and that hurt nobody.

False narrative.

You've admitted that police can't catch all those committing crimes you listed. Perhaps you can tell me how many slipped through the cracks when those officers were arresting Stormy. Do you have the numbers?

 

[CFM]

You made the claim. As the claimant, it is incumbent upon you to provide evidence to support any allegation youmake.

Trippy claimed we have no way of knowing whether or not something he considers a "real" crime occurred when Stormy was being arrested yet he's arguing that while police were dealing with her, murderers, rapists, pedophiles, etc. were running free. I'm not real sure how he can say any of that happened then admit there's no way to know.

 

[Legion]

I imagine he trolls wherever he posts.

The imaginings of an imbecile unsupported by any corroborating facts, it must be noted.

It’s why he is known as Legion Troll by long time members of this forum.

It is? says who? You, imbecile?

Damocles gave me that name because I used to have numerous sock accounts, and he has stated that he doesn't consider me to be a troll.

Imbecile.

 

[TrippyHippy]

False narrative.

Reality.

You've admitted that police can't catch all those committing crimes you listed. Perhaps you can tell me how many slipped through the cracks when those officers were arresting Stormy. Do you have the numbers?

There are no numbers. I never made that the claim that violent crimes specifically occurred during Stormy's arrest, only that enforcing those types of laws tend to distract from such violent crimes. It is not an inaccurate statement to say if finite resources go one place, they can't go somewhere else.

 

[Legion]

Trippy claimed we have no way of knowing whether or not something he considers a "real" crime occurred when Stormy was being arrested yet he's arguing that while police were dealing with her, murderers, rapists, pedophiles, etc. were running free. I'm not real sure how he can say any of that happened then admit there's no way to know.

He doesn't seem to be much good at debating, does he?

 

[Legion]

Reality.

So you say.

There are no numbers. I never made that the claim that violent crimes specifically occurred during Stormy's arrest, only that enforcing those types of laws tend to distract from such violent crimes. It is not an inaccurate statement to say if finite resources go one place, they can't go somewhere else.

You haven't proven that any rapes or murders were reported during the time officers were arresting Stormy Daniels, have you?

 

[CFM]

He doesn't seem to be much good at debating, does he?

He's too busy trying to figure out what HE deems as a real crime or not a real crime.

 

[CFM]

Reality.



There are no numbers. I never made that the claim that violent crimes specifically occurred during Stormy's arrest, only that enforcing those types of laws tend to distract from such violent crimes. It is not an inaccurate statement to say if finite resources go one place, they can't go somewhere else.

It's not inaccurate to say finite resources, by definition, mean limited. Where the problem come in is when you say, without a doubt, that because a resource was used to do what you consider ridiculous it meant that what you deem important someone how actually happened.

If you can't show that something occurred during a time when something you say didn't need to be done was taking place, to claim the latter prevented the former from being done is conjecture, speculation, and plain old subjectivity.

 

[CFM]

So you say.



You haven't proven that any rapes or murders were reported during the time officers were arresting Stormy Daniels, have you?

Yet he keeps saying that resources spent on dealing with Stormy kept something else from being enforced. Without number, and he admits there aren't any, that statement is purely subjective opinion.

 

[domer76]

Link to where Trump grabbed a pussy?

^The stupid is strong in this one

 

[CFM]

^The stupid is strong in this one

Where's your link?

 

[domer76]

Reading comprehension issues? “And when you’re a star, they let you do it” isn't saying he assaulted them.

Derp

 

[TrippyHippy]

It's not inaccurate to say finite resources, by definition, mean limited.

Where the problem come in is when you say, without a doubt, that because a resource was used to do what you consider ridiculous it meant that what you deem important someone how actually happened.

If you can't show that something occurred during a time when something you say didn't need to be done was taking place, to claim the latter prevented the former from being done is conjecture, speculation, and plain old subjectivity.

If resources are limited they must be allocated with a certain priority in mind, yes? I didn't say a specific incident happened during that specific time, did I? I said using police resources for that arrest and similar arrests distracts them from violent crime that could have been occurring.

 

[Joe Capitalist]

An NBC affiliate confirmed the arrest early Thursday morning with information from the Franklin County Ohio Sheriff's Office. Daniels was taken to the correctional facility at Jackson Pike and has reportedly been charged with misdemeanor sex offenses. Her next court date is Friday, July 13.

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/12/sto...-columbus-ohio-while-performing-avenatti.html

Now she can be a Reg Sex Offender

Charges against adult film actress Stormy Daniels for allegedly touching three undercover detectives while performing at an Ohio strip club were dismissed Thursday, her attorney said.

Daniels, who gained notoriety after suing President Donald Trump following an alleged affair, had faced three misdemeanor counts of illegally touching a patron, court records show.
She posted a $6,054 bail and was released Thursday morning, and was due to be arraigned Friday morning, records show.
Daniels, whose legal name is Stephanie Clifford, was expected to plead not guilty to the three misdemeanor charges, her attorney, Michael Avenatti, tweeted.
The arrest of Daniels and two others was part of a "long-term investigation into allegations of human trafficking, prostitution, & other vice related violations," Columbus police said in a statement.
Documents accuse her of fondling patrons.
Under an Ohio law passed in 2007, an employee who regularly appears nude or seminude is prohibited from touching patrons on the premises of a sexually oriented business -- unless it's a family member.
In a probable cause affidavit obtained by CNN affiliate WSYX, detectives who were at the Sirens Gentlemen's Club said they observed Daniels remove her top and force patrons' faces into her chest.

Sorry to disappoint you, Volsrock. It may bother you to have a hot babe rub her breasts in your face but the rest of us normal hombres tend to enjoy it. But whatever floats your little pink boat.