You say these munitions would cause massive destruction because you MADE UP a hypothetical where some people were put in the hospital...
But look at what the experts say, they would not put anyone in the hospital... They are no more dangerous than rubbing your skin aginst a rug!
I can see why you support Bush if you are so delusional as to think these degraded munitions merely capable of causing a rug burn are WMD!
Arnold, are you a weapons expert? Because every one I have heard, classify Sarin bombs as a WMD. The people who are destroying these WMD's in Iraq, are following U.S. Military procedures for handling WMD's, so they think they are WMD's as well. Before the war, when the case was being made for war, and it was articulated by Colin Powell, that Saddam had WMD's, Sarin bombs were listed as part of the arsenal, and all of the UN agreed these were WMD's. When UN inspectors combed Iraq, they were following guidelines set by UNMOVIC and UNSCOM, which indicated Sarin as a WMD.
To try and win an argument now, based on your opinion that Sarin bombs are not WMD's, is patently foolish. When you present some tangible evidence that Sarin was not a WMD, I will be willing to listen to what you have to say, right now, you are desperately avoiding reality, and looking rather stupid doing it.
I've not heard anyone compare Sarin to a rug burn, except your ignorant ass.
Link please?
Yes, I made up a hypothetical, one that is very possible, and could have happened. That's what hypotheticals are, things people make up, that could happen. Your problem is, my hypothetical exposes you for the idiot you are, so you are going to attack the hypothetical and insist Sarin bombs are not WMD's. No fucking wonder people won't vote for your party, you don't even know what a WMD is!
Again...
The UN considered them WMD's.
Hans Blix considers them WMD's.
The Kurds consider them WMD's.
The Suni's and Shiia consider them WMD's.
The US Military considers them WMD's.
The people destroying them, consider them WMD's.
The people who said they weren't in Iraq, considered them WMD's.
The people who said they were in Iraq, consider them WMD's.
John Kerry and France, consider Sarin bombs as WMD's.
You and Arnold are about the only two morons I've heard, who don't consider them WMD's. I wonder if this is a classic case of denial, or just a pathetic and lame attempt to spin? Surely you wouldn't be trying to seriously make this point, it must be denial, or you have to be the two most ignorant people on the planet, regarding what IS and ISN'T a WMD.
Jarod, are you Alex?
ROTFLMAO......
Okay so now the Department of Defense and George W. Bush disagree with Dixie's calling these degraded 20 year old burried munitions WMD!
what if they were dumped in a major city's water supply ? would that be considered mass disstruction, or would it be easily filltered, or become harmless ?
what if they were dumped in a major city's water supply ? would that be considered mass disstruction, or would it be easily filltered, or become harmless ?
No, I am like Damo, I think "mass destruction" is a subjective term, depending on who you are talking to. I believe that if 10 degraded Sarin bombs went off in American schools and malls, it would be described as "mass destruction" here, perhaps it would be just another day, in Israel.
But it's nice to know that you wouldn't consider such a scenario as being "mass destruction" ...merely a minor inconvenience, having to treat kids for a few weeks in the hospital and such. It's nice to know that the prospects of terrorists using these degraded bombs to terrorize us, would not sway your opinion one bit, you'd still think of them as harmless and unworthy of our concern. Glad we could get that on the record!