South Carolina congressional map deliberately hurt Black voters, judges rule

[Guno צְבִי]

 

[Stone]

Crackers? You use that term a lot. Do you STILL feel the lash? Is that what it is?

 

[Nordberg]

The judges – all three appointed by Democratic presidents
From your source

Say no more. Three Progressive Leftist judges rule against Republicans--how usual...

Say more. The Repubs have weaponized gerrymandering. You just do not care if they do it. To simply say it was a political decision is saying the whole country is just political. No judges can be trusted. No lawyers, no politicians. It points an ugly picture of America and you jump into the cesspool

 

[serendipity]

Ok

Dogs fed


They even got their after dinner bones


I’ll go get Mount Everest

You give them boners, I'm sure they appreciate it.

 

[Gondwanaland]

Jan 6 (Reuters) - South Carolina's Republican-created congressional map deliberately split up Black neighborhoods in Charleston to diminish their voting power and must be redrawn, a three-judge federal panel ruled on Friday.

The Republican-controlled legislature adopted the map last year after the 2020 U.S. Census as part of the once-a-decade redistricting process that all states complete.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/so...ely-hurt-black-voters-judges-rule-2023-01-06/

Lol, so not gerrymandering a bunch of blacks into the same district is 'harmful'

 

[Gondwanaland]

Jan 6 (Reuters) - South Carolina's Republican-created congressional map deliberately split up Black neighborhoods in Charleston to diminish their voting power and must be redrawn, a three-judge federal panel ruled on Friday.

The Republican-controlled legislature adopted the map last year after the 2020 U.S. Census as part of the once-a-decade redistricting process that all states complete.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/so...ely-hurt-black-voters-judges-rule-2023-01-06/

Meanwhile nary a peep here in Colorado when Democrats redistricted in order to create a district that gave Latinos disproportionate power.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

The Heritage foundation is right wing deep trash you stupid russian

Your gross combination of racism and willful ignorance shows you have nothing worthwhile to add to the conversation.

 

[Gondwanaland]

That is a partisan site you ass crack

Hm, a partisan site.... sort of like a 3-judge panel of democrats.....

 

[T. A. Gardner]

Had the judges been Republican and I dismissed it, what would your reply have been?

I'd have looked up the case, like I did, then the judges such as Richard Gergel an Obama appointee, and reviewed their bio and history. If they were ruling politically from the bench, sobeit and I'd say so.

 

[Gondwanaland]

I suggest you post this to your cunty friend evince in the post above you.

 

[Gondwanaland]

1982 lawsuit and consent decree
Edit
A civil lawsuit was filed after the election by the DNC, which alleged that the RNC had violated the Voting Rights Act[10] and engaged in illegal harassment and voter intimidation.[11] The suit was settled in 1982, when the Republican National Committee and New Jersey Republican State Committee, instead of a trial, signed a consent decree in U.S. District Court saying that they would not allow tactics that could intimidate Democratic voters, though they did not admit any wrongdoing.[10][12][13] The case and ensuing decree were supervised by District Court Judge Dickinson R. Debevoise for the ensuing 34 years.[14]

The consent decree, entered on November 1, 1982,[13] prevented the Republican Party "from engaging in activities that suppress the vote, particularly when it comes to minority voters."[15] It also barred the wearing of armbands at polling places.[15] Under the consent decree "the Republican party organizations agreed to allow a federal court to review proposed 'ballot security' programs, including any proposed voter caging."[13] The consent decree was set to expire in December 2017.[16] A successor consent decree, applying to several states, was entered on July 27, 1987.[13]

voter intimidation, huh?

Like New Black Panther members standing outside polling places to intimidate people for your Obamessiah? That sort of intimidation?

 

[AProudLefty]

I suggest you post this to your cunty friend evince in the post above you.

They describe themselves as conservative.

Heritage’s mission is to formulate and promote public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense.

 

[AProudLefty]

I'd have looked up the case, like I did, then the judges such as Richard Gergel an Obama appointee, and reviewed their bio and history. If they were ruling politically from the bench, sobeit and I'd say so.

You have not proved that they ruled this politically. If S.C. did not gerrymander, then it would be simple to prove.

 

[Gondwanaland]

They describe themselves as conservative.

Heritage’s mission is to formulate and promote public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense.

How does that change the genetic fallacy your cunty little friend engaged in, you hypocritical twat?

 

[AProudLefty]

How does that change the genetic fallacy your cunty little friend engaged in, you hypocritical twat?

It doesn't change anything. I am just pointing out the fact that they describe themselves as conservative. So his statement is correct about them being partisan.

If an organization or their site describe themselves as liberal, would you consider them to be partisan as well?

 

[T. A. Gardner]

Meanwhile nary a peep here in Colorado when Democrats redistricted in order to create a district that gave Latinos disproportionate power.

Or New York's redistricting by Democrats that was so egregious that even the most partisan Democrat judges overturned it.

New York’s highest court, the Court of Appeals, ruled last month that the Democrat-controlled Legislature had failed to follow an anti-gerrymandering constitutional process approved by voters in 2014 when it drew new political districts for the 2022 elections.
https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/loc...uit-challenges-new-york-assembly-map/3690037/

How to Gerrymander a Fiasco New York Democrats have once again made the state a national laughingstock.
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2022/05/new-york-democrats-gerrymandered-a-fiasco.html

Democrats decry gerrymandering — unless they control the maps
https://thehill.com/homenews/state-...-gerrymandering-unless-they-control-the-maps/

When Democrats are the ones drawing the maps, gerrymandering and other political ploys to get and retain power are just fine...

How Democrats learned to stop worrying and love the gerrymander
https://www.vox.com/22961590/redistricting-gerrymandering-house-2022-midterms

Even rabidly Leftist and Democrat friendly Vox says that's true.

 

[Gondwanaland]

It doesn't change anything. I am just pointing out the fact that they describe themselves as conservative. So his statement is correct about them being partisan.

If an organization or their site describe themselves as liberal, would you consider them to be partisan as well?

His statement about them being 'partisan' was used to dismiss the findings, you dumb cunt.

 

[AProudLefty]

His statement about them being 'partisan' was used to dismiss the findings, you dumb cunt.

Okay fuckstick.

That is a partisan site you ass crack

Now ask your little friend T. A. what he thinks about CNN, NBC, MSNBC WaPo and the likes.

 

[evince]

His statement about them being 'partisan' was used to dismiss the findings, you dumb cunt.

I’m a chick


The heritage site is trash

 

[Gondwanaland]

I’m a chick

I don't give a fuck.

The heritage site is trash

So are your posts. Sounds like you'll get along swell.