Somebody name one

A link is a source, not an argument. :palm: Where's the quote from your source? :dunno:



The German right were Socialists, too. There was nothing conservative or libertarian about them.

The only thing Hitler was to the right of, was Marxism. Hitler created a massive welfare State and Obamacare.

Read the source fool, and if you are as intelligent as a gnat you will see it.
 
Next, I recommend you actually take a university level European history class. It is an unequivocal fact that the German left, including the Social Democratic Party, were the only people in Germany offering resistance to Hitler and the Nazis. German conservatives were pretty much going along with Hitler, or keeping their heads down at best.

Monarchists and Socialist Authoritarians are on the Left. Free Trade libertarian and small gov't conservatism are on the right. Just because Hitler had it backwards, doesn't mean you have to do it, too.

Hitler was further Left than Social Democrats..
 
First, why did you create this sock puppet?
I appreciate you admitting up front that you are a moron, but we already knew that.

Next, I recommend you actually take a university level European history class.
No, I'm not buying that you ever finished high school.

It is an unequivocal fact that the German left, including the Social Democratic Party, were the only people in Germany offering resistance to Hitler and the Nazis.
Nope. Hitler had more enemies than at whom you could shake a stick. Hitler was insane. He could, however, light a fire under the population and motivate them to give him power.

You are clueless.

The fact that Hitler arrested, executed, and imprisoned members of the German political left is a testament to these historical facts.
Hitler was on the far left. He arrested and executed his competitors and political enemies on the far left. His first executions were communists.

Did I mention that you are clueless?
 
You're fine as long as you specify within the context of a republic, otherwise you are describing all states immediately preceding a transition.

Revolutions are democracies that quickly result in either a republic, e.g. the US, or an oligarchy, e.g. Venezuela, Cuba, Soviet Union, Nazi Germany, Mao's China, Pol Pot's Cambodia, etc...

If you specify a republican context then you are clarifying that the "democracy" is constrained to laws and certain individual rights are protected, i.e. the mob does not rule but rather there is rule of law.


.

The real reason Republicans say that America isn't a Democracy is because they don't want any form of Democracy.
 
Poor point. Neo Nazis are rare as are antifa people. That supports my point. So are white supremacists.

The point is that just because a person meeting a couple, if at all, of certain type of people, doesn't mean there aren't many.

That's the logic posters here are using.

FWIW, I've met plenty of racists and I know a few.
 
The point is that just because a person meeting a couple, if at all, of certain type of people, doesn't mean there aren't many.
What is many?
That's the logic posters here are using.

FWIW, I've met plenty of racists and I know a few.
I didn't say anything about racists. That's way to broad of a term. You could consider someone racist for just about anything. I was talking specifically about white supremacists.
 
Back
Top