Somebody name one

martin said:
None of the disturbances were as bad as the Watts or Rodney King riots. Nor were those or the Floyd outbreaks "leftist" or even political. They were social
outbursts fueled by anger. Perhaps that is something you might be able to understand, Earl, but you will have to remove your blinders first.
Click to expand...

You're an idiot. Why would leftist rioters in Australia care about George Floyd in America?

They had it all ready to go and were just waiting on a semi-suitable catalyst. It was organized worldwide, you dumbfuck.

IMO, George Floyd should have hanged years ago for violent robbery.
 
AProudLefty said:
No you didn't.
Click to expand...

Yes, I did Tard Boy. You never answer mine Tard Boy. Be less stupid and dishonest Tard Boy.

AProudLefty said:
Prove to me that racists cannot join and be Proud Boys. What are the membership rules for that?
Click to expand...

You're the lying douchebag that claimed they can. I still haven't seen your evidence Tard Boy. Why do you stupidly think that I need to prove they cannot join when I am not the one making the statement in the first place Tard Boy?

So, are you ready to prove your claim Tard Boy? Or will you continue to cry, lie and flail like the thread trolling Tard Boy we know you to be. I do wish you could be less stupid and dishonest. Really I do.
 
Truth Detector said:
Yes, I did Tard Boy. You never answer mine Tard Boy. Be less stupid and dishonest Tard Boy.



You're the lying douchebag that claimed they can. I still haven't seen your evidence Tard Boy. Why do you stupidly think that I need to prove they cannot join when I am not the one making the statement in the first place Tard Boy?

So, are you ready to prove your claim Tard Boy? Or will you continue to cry, lie and flail like the thread trolling Tard Boy we know you to be. I do wish you could be less stupid and dishonest. Really I do.
Click to expand...

Okay it's settled. They can join the Proud Boys.
 
AProudLefty said:
Okay it's settled. They can join the Proud Boys.
Click to expand...

No, what's settled that you're a lying dumbass Tard Boy. You will always be a thread trolling lying dumbass, Tard Boy. I wish you could be less stupid and dishonest.

tenor.gif
 
anatta said:
feds went in to protect federal property -the federal courthouse. their purview since the locals were letting it be atacked every night.
Click to expand...

Problem is they did not stop there. It was not part of their objective to attack protesters, and arrest them.

The fact the "protests" (riots) went on for over 100 days striaght means it causes immenese damage -
even to those 6 .blocks.
The fact you dismiss this as inconsequential means you aren't a businees owner,or someone pulled over by the mob.
Click to expand...

Damn, you need to learn how to use spell check.

Residents of that area did not feel the danger you provocateurs who were not there promote.

Then you blame Trump.. fucking hilarious if it weren't so tragic and misguided on your part..
Click to expand...

Even many of your own blame trump. However, I said nothing that placed the blame on his alone. It has been well established that others took advantage of the situation, and hijacked the protests for their own political gain.

PS it's the left that want to
pack the court
end filibusters
end electoral college
destroy our economy with green new deal
Click to expand...

More right wing lies.

Republicans are already "packing the court" with unqualified judges save for political ideology,

Filibusters are already gone.

EC is a worthless institution as long as the partisans control the process.

Green New Deal will benefit the economy with new technology, and jobs.
 
Old Trapper said:
Problem is they did not stop there. It was not part of their objective to attack protesters, and arrest them.
Click to expand...
protestors ( call them what they are rioters) attack cops with rocks/frozen water bottles/ laser (shine in eyes) and bricks..
I have no idea what you mean by "attacking protestors" can cops defend themselves and put down a riot?
which includes tear gas and batons?
as to arrests -again are cops still allowed to arrest violent street thugs in your progressive nightmare world?

Damn, you need to learn how to use spell check.
Click to expand...
i'm working online -multitasking

Residents of that area did not feel the danger you provocateurs who were not there promote.
Click to expand...
oh i get it! the cops were provocateurs! the poor rioters were only there for peaceful assembly.
"Mostly Peaceful protestors" now bring bricks, and lasers, and rocks, and frozen water bottles..ROFL

Even many of your own blame trump. However, I said nothing that placed the blame on his alone. It has been well established that others took advantage of the situation, and hijacked the protests for their own political gain.
Click to expand...
no. i never heard anyone except left wing loons/ MSNBC and CNN attempt to say "Trump did it"
If Portand's finest couldn't defend federal property....then the feds will. the mostly peaceful protestors jumped right in
for fun and mayhem


Republicans are already "packing the court" with unqualified judges save for political ideology,
Click to expand...
nominations are not "packing the court -your definitions are so fluid as to be meaningless.
Packing the court means putting more then 9 on SCOTUS..
Maybe you should ask Joe Biden if he's going to do that -oh wait - he wont say.

Filibusters are already gone.
Click to expand...
not for introducing legislation -like ramming thru the unpopular Green New Deal

EC is a worthless institution as long as the partisans control the process.
Click to expand...
huh? there are faithful electors -not "partisans"

Green New Deal will benefit the economy with new technology, and jobs.
Click to expand...
it will destroy our energy sector, cause massive layoffs, reduce our heating supplies to what Germany now uses
(wood pellets) and rely solely on charging stations that will be vandalized
 
anatta said:
protestors ( call them what they are rioters) attack cops with rocks/frozen water bottles/ laser (shine in eyes) and bricks..
I have no idea what you mean by "attacking protestors" can cops defend themselves and put down a riot?
which includes tear gas and batons?
as to arrests -again are cops still allowed to arrest violent street thugs in your progressive nightmare world?


i'm working online -multitasking


oh i get it! the cops were provocateurs! the poor rioters were only there for peaceful assembly.
"Mostly Peaceful protestors" now bring bricks, and lasers, and rocks, and frozen water bottles..ROFL


no. i never heard anyone except left wing loons/ MSNBC and CNN attempt to say "Trump did it"
If Portand's finest couldn't defend federal property....then the feds will. the mostly peaceful protestors jumped right in
for fun and mayhem



nominations are not "packing the court -your definitions are so fluid as to be meaningless.
Packing the court means putting more then 9 on SCOTUS..
Maybe you should ask Joe Biden if he's going to do that -oh wait - he wont say.


not for introducing legislation -like ramming thru the unpopular Green New Deal


huh? there are faithful electors -not "partisans"


it will destroy our energy sector, cause massive layoffs, reduce our heating supplies to what Germany now uses
(wood pellets) and rely solely on charging stations that will be vandalized
Click to expand...

Additional Rubles have been deposited in your account.
 
AProudLefty said:
History lesson not needed. I find it curious that when Islamic terrorism is mentioned, especially 9/11, we don't talk about the Saudis.
Click to expand...
we don't?
KSA didn't sponsor the terrorists, but bin Laden was a saudi who was kicked out.

But the common thread was al-Qaeda; not KSA.
Fifteen of them were citizens of Saudi Arabia, two were from the United Arab Emirates, one was from Lebanon,
and the last was from Egypt.
 
anatta said:
we don't?
KSA didn't sponsor the terrorists, but bin Laden was a saudi who was kicked out.

But the common thread was al-Qaeda; not KSA.
Fifteen of them were citizens of Saudi Arabia, two were from the United Arab Emirates, one was from Lebanon,
and the last was from Egypt.
Click to expand...

So why didn't we ban travel from Saudi Arabia, a known sponsor of terrorism?
 
AProudLefty said:
History lesson not needed. I find it curious that when Islamic terrorism is mentioned, especially 9/11, we don't talk about the Saudis.
Click to expand...

I find it curious that no one wants to talk about where Islamic terrorism disappeared to under Trump.

Waiting to see if Biden wins?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top