Some people just WON'T listen

zappasguitar

Well-known member
WOW...refusing to believe evidence placed right in front of her...I guess the Hate for President Obama does indeed run deep in some.



Star of anti-Obamacare ad refuses to accept proof that ACA will save her money


The Michigan woman who starred in an anti-Obamacare flatly refused to believe that she would actually save money under the policy. The Detroit News informed Julie Boonstra Monday that according to their research, she would actually save more than $1,000 a year under the Affordable Care Act — also known as Obamacare.

Saying it “can’t be true,” Boonstra told the News, “I personally do not believe that.”

Boonstra starred in “Julie’s Story: It’s Time to Listen,” an anti-Obamacare attack ad that claimed the Dexter, Michigan woman’s premiums would skyrocket under the ACA. Boonstra was diagnosed with leukemia five years ago and claimed in the 60-second spot that her old health care plan was canceled thanks to the new law.

“Now, the out-of-pocket costs are so high, it’s unaffordable,” she claimed.

Whereas Boonstra’s old plan cost $1,100 per month, it did not include any out-of-pocket expenses, co-pays, or prescription coverage. The News said:

Boonstra said Monday her new plan she dislikes is the Blue Cross Premier Gold health care plan, which caps patient responsibility for out-of-pocket costs at $5,100 a year, lower than the federal law’s maximum of $6,350 a year. It means the new plan will save her at least $1,200 compared with her former insurance plan she preferred that was ended under Obamacare’s coverage requirements.

A representative of Blue Cross Blue Shield expressed concern to the paper that Boonstra doesn’t understand her new options as a cancer survivor under the ACA.

“We are here to help people like Ms. Boonstra to work their way through adjusting to the health plans we are now offering them,” said Blue Cross spokesperson Andy Hetzel. “If there are questions…they should call.”

Meanwhile, the ACA is gaining in popularity nationwide as more people begin to understand what it actually entails.

CNN reported Tuesday morning that half the public favors Obamacare or doesn’t support it because they believe it doesn’t go far enough. The CNN poll found that the uptick in support mainly occurred among young and college-educated Americans.

Americans for Prosperity — the group that funded the now-debunked anti-ACA ad — is a conservative think tank that receives significant funding from billionaire brothers Charles and David Koch. Last week, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) lambasted the Koch brothers and AFP as enemies of democracy.

On the Senate floor, Reid said that the Kochs are “trying to buy America” and “are about as un-American as anyone that I can imagine.”


http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/03/...to-accept-proof-that-aca-will-save-her-money/
 

"Well, thanks to the Affordable Care Act, young people can stay on their parents' insurance until they are 26," said the first lady of the United States. "But once they hit 26 -- they're on their own. And a lot young people think they're invincible. But the truth is, young people are knuckleheads. They're the ones who are cooking for the first time and slice their finger open, they're dancing on the bar stool."


:rofl2:
 
http://tinyurl.com/l6az6q5


[h=1]New York cancer survivor stuck in ObamaCare mess over doctor confusion[/h]
Months after cancer survivor Annette Frey was dropped by her insurance provider and forced to sign up for ObamaCare, the New Yorker is still finding herself on the losing end of a bureaucratic runaround. At the heart of her maze of problems is the fact that the plan she signed up for on the New York exchange listed doctors she needed as "in network" -- she later found out they were not. Frey tells FoxNews.com she’s at her wit’s end trying to decode what she needs to do to be able to see the doctor who diagnosed her lung cancer two years ago.
She also wants to be able to get referrals to see specialists in Manhattan and approval for six-month checkups, which include CAT scans and pulmonary function tests.
But so far, she hasn’t been able to.

When she dies from lack of getting care, Zippy can brag about, "at least her out of pocket was cheaper"....

yeah, and her care non-existent....
 
http://tinyurl.com/l6az6q5


[h=1]New York cancer survivor stuck in ObamaCare mess over doctor confusion[/h]
Months after cancer survivor Annette Frey was dropped by her insurance provider and forced to sign up for ObamaCare, the New Yorker is still finding herself on the losing end of a bureaucratic runaround. At the heart of her maze of problems is the fact that the plan she signed up for on the New York exchange listed doctors she needed as "in network" -- she later found out they were not. Frey tells FoxNews.com she’s at her wit’s end trying to decode what she needs to do to be able to see the doctor who diagnosed her lung cancer two years ago.
She also wants to be able to get referrals to see specialists in Manhattan and approval for six-month checkups, which include CAT scans and pulmonary function tests.
But so far, she hasn’t been able to.

When she dies from lack of getting care, Zippy can brag about, "at least her out of pocket was cheaper"....

yeah, and her care non-existent....

Yeah right...the "source" for this story?

Faux News.

Not buying it...AT ALL...try again.
 
WOW...refusing to believe evidence placed right in front of her...I guess the Hate for President Obama does indeed run deep in some.



Star of anti-Obamacare ad refuses to accept proof that ACA will save her money


The Michigan woman who starred in an anti-Obamacare flatly refused to believe that she would actually save money under the policy. The Detroit News informed Julie Boonstra Monday that according to their research, she would actually save more than $1,000 a year under the Affordable Care Act — also known as Obamacare.

Saying it “can’t be true,” Boonstra told the News, “I personally do not believe that.”

Boonstra starred in “Julie’s Story: It’s Time to Listen,” an anti-Obamacare attack ad that claimed the Dexter, Michigan woman’s premiums would skyrocket under the ACA. Boonstra was diagnosed with leukemia five years ago and claimed in the 60-second spot that her old health care plan was canceled thanks to the new law.

“Now, the out-of-pocket costs are so high, it’s unaffordable,” she claimed.

Whereas Boonstra’s old plan cost $1,100 per month, it did not include any out-of-pocket expenses, co-pays, or prescription coverage. The News said:

Boonstra said Monday her new plan she dislikes is the Blue Cross Premier Gold health care plan, which caps patient responsibility for out-of-pocket costs at $5,100 a year, lower than the federal law’s maximum of $6,350 a year. It means the new plan will save her at least $1,200 compared with her former insurance plan she preferred that was ended under Obamacare’s coverage requirements.

A representative of Blue Cross Blue Shield expressed concern to the paper that Boonstra doesn’t understand her new options as a cancer survivor under the ACA.

“We are here to help people like Ms. Boonstra to work their way through adjusting to the health plans we are now offering them,” said Blue Cross spokesperson Andy Hetzel. “If there are questions…they should call.”

Meanwhile, the ACA is gaining in popularity nationwide as more people begin to understand what it actually entails.

CNN reported Tuesday morning that half the public favors Obamacare or doesn’t support it because they believe it doesn’t go far enough. The CNN poll found that the uptick in support mainly occurred among young and college-educated Americans.

Americans for Prosperity — the group that funded the now-debunked anti-ACA ad — is a conservative think tank that receives significant funding from billionaire brothers Charles and David Koch. Last week, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) lambasted the Koch brothers and AFP as enemies of democracy.

On the Senate floor, Reid said that the Kochs are “trying to buy America” and “are about as un-American as anyone that I can imagine.”


http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/03/...to-accept-proof-that-aca-will-save-her-money/

She's obviously afraid to retract what she said in the ad. She got paid to say it and she doens't want to look like a fool. The damn Koch Brothers are just getting going. It's not so much that they lie, it's the problem of planting lies in the heads of the weak minded radicals and Fox News and Lush Rumbaugh et al will run with that bullshit all the way to November. That's how propoganda works; the more bullshit you throw out the harder it is to plug the holes. That's why I think that Hillary is biding her time. I only hope she picks a great running mate.
 
The best source in the country and you ain't buying it?......as they say, "ignorance is bliss"....


The best source for RIGHTIE PROPAGANDA...which is why rational folk don't just accept what they say.

Unfortunately, Faux has found there are MILLIONS of gullible fools willing to buy into Faux News' ridiculous claims because it validates their own irrational hate.
 
WOW...refusing to believe evidence placed right in front of her...I guess the Hate for President Obama does indeed run deep in some.



Star of anti-Obamacare ad refuses to accept proof that ACA will save her money


The Michigan woman who starred in an anti-Obamacare flatly refused to believe that she would actually save money under the policy. The Detroit News informed Julie Boonstra Monday that according to their research, she would actually save more than $1,000 a year under the Affordable Care Act — also known as Obamacare.

Saying it “can’t be true,” Boonstra told the News, “I personally do not believe that.”

Boonstra starred in “Julie’s Story: It’s Time to Listen,” an anti-Obamacare attack ad that claimed the Dexter, Michigan woman’s premiums would skyrocket under the ACA. Boonstra was diagnosed with leukemia five years ago and claimed in the 60-second spot that her old health care plan was canceled thanks to the new law.

“Now, the out-of-pocket costs are so high, it’s unaffordable,” she claimed.

Whereas Boonstra’s old plan cost $1,100 per month, it did not include any out-of-pocket expenses, co-pays, or prescription coverage. The News said:

Boonstra said Monday her new plan she dislikes is the Blue Cross Premier Gold health care plan, which caps patient responsibility for out-of-pocket costs at $5,100 a year, lower than the federal law’s maximum of $6,350 a year. It means the new plan will save her at least $1,200 compared with her former insurance plan she preferred that was ended under Obamacare’s coverage requirements.

A representative of Blue Cross Blue Shield expressed concern to the paper that Boonstra doesn’t understand her new options as a cancer survivor under the ACA.

“We are here to help people like Ms. Boonstra to work their way through adjusting to the health plans we are now offering them,” said Blue Cross spokesperson Andy Hetzel. “If there are questions…they should call.”

Meanwhile, the ACA is gaining in popularity nationwide as more people begin to understand what it actually entails.

CNN reported Tuesday morning that half the public favors Obamacare or doesn’t support it because they believe it doesn’t go far enough. The CNN poll found that the uptick in support mainly occurred among young and college-educated Americans.

Americans for Prosperity — the group that funded the now-debunked anti-ACA ad — is a conservative think tank that receives significant funding from billionaire brothers Charles and David Koch. Last week, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) lambasted the Koch brothers and AFP as enemies of democracy.

On the Senate floor, Reid said that the Kochs are “trying to buy America” and “are about as un-American as anyone that I can imagine.”


http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/03/...to-accept-proof-that-aca-will-save-her-money/

???....the premiums for the gold plan are more than $1500 a month, her old plan cost her $1100 a month....in addition it said that her previous policy had no out of pocket charges, thus an out of pocket charge of $5100 is not $1200 less than she had been paying, its $5100 more.....automatic thread fail.....

the $1200 is the difference between the out of pocket charge she is paying now and the maximum out of pocket charge allowed by Obama care now......that has nothing to do with what she was previously paying......
 
Last edited:
Back
Top