This is beyond laughable. Do you read your own posts? For a "lawyer" you have a hard time with middle school English. Beyond that, you must be referring to something you got your ass kicked with.
Some of my less learned posters need a primer on impeachable offences.
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
This is beyond laughable. Do you read your own posts? For a "lawyer" you have a hard time with middle school English. Beyond that, you must be referring to something you got your ass kicked with.
Jesus. It's hard to keep track of the stupidest morons on this forum, but this asshole is consistently at or near the top.
He posts nothing but bullshit and lies and NEVER posts a single citation to validate them.
We went round and round for probably weeks, on the atmospheric absorption of the sun's radiation. One reason he's called ZERO, is that what he claimed and the number of scientific references he provided. While I gave him everything from NASA, NOAA, Columbia University and others.
On other subjects, I gave him 10 opportunities to refute my posts or validate his. All I got was the same bullshit you see on this thread.
Massive stupidity combined with willful ignorance. Maybe some mental illness by replying to his own posts. Schizophrenia?
This guy is a high school dropout with ZERO education and ZERO intellectual curiosity to seek the truth. He's nothing more than a spudpeeler and never will amount to anything more.
You should be able to prove that Domer. With some posts or something. What is taking you so long? I love having more education and success than you and Micabwer could ever dream of. Then again any conservative would naturally.
I had a similar experience where he tried to argue unilateral secession is legal despite such things as (1) a war resolution of the conflict, (2) a lawsuit finding it illegal and perhaps a dozen others wherein its illegality were ratio decidende, and (3) even Justice Scalia saying it is illegal.
He is stubborn type of dumb. Being dumb is fine, the annoying part is his laziness. He never substantiates anything, as you stated.
How many times do you have to count each ballot. Seems complicated. Couldn't it elect a candidate who was not the 1st, 2nd, or 3rd (etc.) choice of any voters?
Are the voters still voting for one Dem and one Rep nominated by the parties? If not, how do candidates qualify for the ballot?
Wow. You have as much of a imagination as Domer. Where are those posts? Certainly you can link to them. Please do if they exist. I am certain they will show you lost and whimpering silently in the corner.
Hmmm. No facts at all to back up what you and your butt fuck buddy Domer are yammering about. What a surprise. Instead of messing up this thread, I will start one just for you and Domer in the war zone. I am certain you will not go to it. To much of liar and pussy.
Good description. "Stubborn kind of dumb". I think "dumb" insults the truly dumb. This moron takes to an entirely different level.
Willfully ignorant, which he is, means exactly as you described. Terminal laziness. But, combine that with his innate stupidity and you see the end product.
His name is ZERO.
Thread just for you and the other Democrat wimp in the war zone. As I can see, you have nothing to back up your bullshit. Like Micabwer. Again. Please, come on down.
Nope. Not gonna run around the forum for your lies and bullshit, cunt.
30 chances to refute my posts or validate yours. 30 failures.
You have shit education, dropout, and it shows. I was better educated by 9th grade than you have ever demonstrated here.
Not ONE fucking citation from a reliable source to back your claims. ZERO.
That's why you are ZERO, ZERO.
Just remember, clueless cunt. One of the major ass kickings EVER on this forum.
Nope. Not gonna run around the forum for your lies and bullshit, cunt.
30 chances to refute my posts or validate yours. 30 failures.
You have shit education, dropout, and it shows. I was better educated by 9th grade than you have ever demonstrated here.
Not ONE fucking citation from a reliable source to back your claims. ZERO.
That's why you are ZERO, ZERO.
Just remember, clueless cunt. One of the major ass kickings EVER on this forum.
Translation: I have absolutely nothing. Sailor once again kicked my ass. Forever be known as the liar you are. Micabwer right behind you.
The do indirectly, especially when a state's electors are bound to vote for the candidate to which they are pledged. Since the people elect the electors and the electors choose the president, the people are essentially electing the president.
Into the Night
Contributor
Nope. Not gonna run around the forum for your lies and bullshit, cunt.
30 chances to refute my posts or validate yours. 30 failures.
You have shit education, dropout, and it shows. I was better educated by 9th grade than you have ever demonstrated here.
Not ONE fucking citation from a reliable source to back your claims. ZERO.
That's why you are ZERO, ZERO.
Just remember, clueless cunt. One of the major ass kickings EVER on this forum.
YALIFNAP.
Into the Night
Contributor
The people do not elect the President. The electoral college is not bound by anything but the Constitution. Each electorate can vote the way they wish. They have one and only one job to do.
OldMercsRule
Verified User
Hey extra stupid fuck.
Name the POTUS that was convicted by the Senate!!!
A below average rock is like Albert Einstein to you, eh?
Lord there are some supid Lefties/Marxists/dim wit Democrats on this forum. burp...
How much radiation from the sun does the atmosphere absorb, ZERO?
I'll wait.
The war zone Domer. Now would be great. Bring your butt fuck buddy Micabwer with you.
PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
Hello Flash,
No, that would never happen. The one candidate who gets the most votes is always the winner. Some of those votes might be the 2nd or 3rd choice etc of some of the voters. But if their first choices are eliminated their subsequent preferences are counted. This way, the results show the true preferences of the voting public. We learn what people really want instead of what they don't want. This system has bipartisan support.
Yes. The parties would still run primaries.
The IRV system, or Ranked Choice Voting as it is also called, gives a much more realistic showing of support for alternative parties besides the stranglehold of two party duopoly.
"Instant-runoff voting (IRV) is a type of ranked preferential voting method used in single-seat elections with more than two candidates. Instead of indicating support for only one candidate, voters in IRV elections can rank the candidates in order of preference. Ballots are initially counted for each voter's top choice. If a candidate has more than half of the vote based on first-choices, that candidate wins. If not, then the candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated. The voters who selected the defeated candidate as a first choice then have their votes added to the totals of their next choice. This process continues until a candidate has more than half of the votes. When the field is reduced to two, it has become an "instant runoff" that allows a comparison of the top two candidates head-to-head. Compared to plurality voting, IRV can reduce the impact of vote-splitting when multiple candidates earn support from like-minded voters. "
Ranked Choice Voting
No, that would never happen. The one candidate who gets the most votes is always the winner. Some of those votes might be the 2nd or 3rd choice etc of some of the voters. But if their first choices are eliminated their subsequent preferences are counted. This way, the results show the true preferences of the voting public. We learn what people really want instead of what they don't want. This system has bipartisan support.
Yes. The parties would still run primaries.
The IRV system, or Ranked Choice Voting as it is also called, gives a much more realistic showing of support for alternative parties besides the stranglehold of two party duopoly.
"Instant-runoff voting (IRV) is a type of ranked preferential voting method used in single-seat elections with more than two candidates. Instead of indicating support for only one candidate, voters in IRV elections can rank the candidates in order of preference. Ballots are initially counted for each voter's top choice. If a candidate has more than half of the vote based on first-choices, that candidate wins. If not, then the candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated. The voters who selected the defeated candidate as a first choice then have their votes added to the totals of their next choice. This process continues until a candidate has more than half of the votes. When the field is reduced to two, it has become an "instant runoff" that allows a comparison of the top two candidates head-to-head. Compared to plurality voting, IRV can reduce the impact of vote-splitting when multiple candidates earn support from like-minded voters. "
Ranked Choice Voting