solid proof of evolution

Mott the Hoople said:
LOL OK, how could I, in principle, demonstrate the Intelligent Designer, doesn’t exist?
Click to expand...

I didn't say you had to.....merely pointed out that Nordnerd's blade has two edges and can cut both ways.......every bit of information ever found points equally well to an intelligent designer......
 
PostmodernProphet said:
I didn't say you had to.....merely pointed out that Nordnerd's blade has two edges and can cut both ways.......every bit of information ever found points equally well to an intelligent designer......
Click to expand...

But I’m saying you do or what you believe is something other than science so I ask you again, how can I, in principle, demonstrate the Intelligent Designer doesn’t exist?
 
actually, there is one issue you have never explained about evolution......is the butterfly a flying creature that began to evolve into a crawling creature so it could better survive, but got fucked up.......or was it a crawling creature that began to evolve into a flying creature so it could better survive, but got fucked up.......
 
Mott the Hoople said:
But I’m saying you do or what you believe is something other than science so I ask you again, how can I, in principle, demonstrate the Intelligent Designer doesn’t exist?
Click to expand...
if you want to try, try.....or if you prefer tell me how macro-evolution can be disproved......or you could just admit that what you believe is something other than science.....
 
Mott the Hoople said:
This would be a good time to post this review by a loud mouthed asshole (I swear it isn’t me) on one of my all time favorite satires. Idiocracy.

The movie, and the reviewer, are spot on in its scathing satire of political populism, which is certain to offend either side of the political divide (the hallmark of a good satire) but also demonstrates a solid understanding of how evolutionary theory actually works in nature. Which makes it ubber appropriate for this thread given many of the posts on this topic.

Ideocracy is thought provoking satire at its finest. I recommend it highly and leave you with this last thought on evolutionary theory....I’m eating Carl Jr’s. Fuck you!

Click to expand...

So you are saying we shouldn't dump birth control in buttfuckers and carls junior food? I think we should, and the intelligent need to fuck much more.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
if you want to try, try.....or if you prefer tell me how macro-evolution can be disproved......or you could just admit that what you believe is something other than science.....
Click to expand...

LOL you fell for that too easily dude. I can easily, in principle, falsify macro evolution and just did so. Now how do I, in principle, falsify an Intelligent Designer?
 
rjhenn said:
The thing of it is, there's absolutely no evidence for the existence of any gods. That's at odds with the idea of an omnipotent God who is both benevolent and wants us to believe in Him. The rational conclusion is that there is no such beast.
Click to expand...

You're absolutely right....there is no proof....and the absence of proof proves nothing....either way...maybe, [FONT=&quot]humans, as a group, can not believe that things just happen. There must be an underlaying cause. Whose to say they are right or wrong.....[/FONT]

There is no proof of life other than on this planet either but I'd guess many men of science believe there is life elsewhere....
 
NOVA said:
You're absolutely right....there is no proof....and the absence of proof proves nothing....either way...maybe, [FONT="]humans, as a group, can not believe that things just happen. There must be an underlaying cause. Whose to say they are right or wrong.....[/FONT]

There is no proof of life other than on this planet either but I'd guess many men of science believe there is life elsewhere....
Click to expand...

Sorry, but when the religious say there is a god, it is their role to prove it. Not the function of non believers. You say so, convince me.

Yes if god exists, there has to be a creator of gods. That is really getting hairy. Does it have to do the image and likeness thing? Can it look like a spider or a squid? The whole concept of gods is just so silly.
 
Its wired into some brains

that is science

a human that hung on a little longer lived longer to procreate

Humans spent most of their time on earth knowing very little
 
Nordberg said:
Sorry, but when the religious say there is a god, it is their role to prove it. Not the function of non believers. You say so, convince me.

Yes if god exists, there has to be a creator of gods. That is really getting hairy. Does it have to do the image and likeness thing? Can it look like a spider or a squid? The whole concept of gods is just so silly.
Click to expand...

Hey....don't be sorry dude....its got nothing to do with you, you don't have to believe what you don't want to believe....you control your own mind.
Believers can't prove anything and neither can you...just about every culture has their own image of the god or gods they believe in....probably even spiders and squids....
the only thing that is undeniable as the world stands today is that believers outnumber non-believers world wide.....and neither can prove anything.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
homologies are not necessarily proof of macro-evolution......they could merely be evidence of a well designed creation......
Click to expand...

Evolution is pretty much accepted as fact...its irrelevant whether its

Organic evolution: life begins from inanimate matter
Macro-evolution: animals and plants change from one type into another
Micro-evolution: variations form within the “kind”
or what PMP describes as a well designed creation
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top