Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
You left out a few things:
a doctrine based on revolutionary Marxian socialism and Marxism-Leninism that was the official ideology of the U.S.S.R.
b: a totalitarian system of government in which a single authoritarian party controls state-owned means of production
If you still don't get it, find a local adult to explain it to you. If you can't find any, I'll reluctantly pablum feed you on the subtle yet crucial differences.
Oh, and only in your fevered little mind does a Socialist Democrat Hate Whitey Party exist. If you have any official information to the contrary, please produce it. Also, only a willfully ignorant right wingnut would put Chavez in the same category as you did with despots that dictators. If you can prove Chavez killed, tortured, incarcerated on an equivalent level, do it. If not, don't waste everyone's time with your worthless opinions and revisionist clap trap.
And FYI regarding the hot mess that is Somalia https://www.un.int/somalia/somalia/country-facts
That is not a rebuttal. Marx's whole scam hinged on selling the "dissolution of gov't" to the peasants. It was an easy sell, given the peasant hatred of the monarchial landed aristocracy.
It is a rebuttal to your previous blather, genius...because to date you've had numerous European countries (England, Sweden, etc.) that have incorporated socialism into their gov't and social strata before my lifetime, and today are NOT the communist enclaves a'la the old Soviet Union ... much less the fascist havens as were Marco's Phillipines, or Pinochet's Chile. A matter of fact, a matter of history whether you like it or not.
No matter how hard you try, you can't substitute your supposition, conjecture and revisionist drivel for facts and history. But big dumb dogs just keep trying. Carry on.


