SOCIALISM TO THE RESCUE JUST IN TIME

Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
You left out a few things:

a doctrine based on revolutionary Marxian socialism and Marxism-Leninism that was the official ideology of the U.S.S.R.
b: a totalitarian system of government in which a single authoritarian party controls state-owned means of production


If you still don't get it, find a local adult to explain it to you. If you can't find any, I'll reluctantly pablum feed you on the subtle yet crucial differences.

Oh, and only in your fevered little mind does a Socialist Democrat Hate Whitey Party exist. If you have any official information to the contrary, please produce it. Also, only a willfully ignorant right wingnut would put Chavez in the same category as you did with despots that dictators. If you can prove Chavez killed, tortured, incarcerated on an equivalent level, do it. If not, don't waste everyone's time with your worthless opinions and revisionist clap trap.

And FYI regarding the hot mess that is Somalia https://www.un.int/somalia/somalia/country-facts


That is not a rebuttal. Marx's whole scam hinged on selling the "dissolution of gov't" to the peasants. It was an easy sell, given the peasant hatred of the monarchial landed aristocracy.

It is a rebuttal to your previous blather, genius...because to date you've had numerous European countries (England, Sweden, etc.) that have incorporated socialism into their gov't and social strata before my lifetime, and today are NOT the communist enclaves a'la the old Soviet Union ... much less the fascist havens as were Marco's Phillipines, or Pinochet's Chile. A matter of fact, a matter of history whether you like it or not.

No matter how hard you try, you can't substitute your supposition, conjecture and revisionist drivel for facts and history. But big dumb dogs just keep trying. Carry on.
 
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
You left out a few things:

a doctrine based on revolutionary Marxian socialism and Marxism-Leninism that was the official ideology of the U.S.S.R.
b: a totalitarian system of government in which a single authoritarian party controls state-owned means of production


If you still don't get it, find a local adult to explain it to you. If you can't find any, I'll reluctantly pablum feed you on the subtle yet crucial differences.

Oh, and only in your fevered little mind does a Socialist Democrat Hate Whitey Party exist. If you have any official information to the contrary, please produce it. Also, only a willfully ignorant right wingnut would put Chavez in the same category as you did with despots that dictators. If you can prove Chavez killed, tortured, incarcerated on an equivalent level, do it. If not, don't waste everyone's time with your worthless opinions and revisionist clap trap.

And FYI regarding the hot mess that is Somalia https://www.un.int/somalia/somalia/country-facts


"
Obama's atrocious statement on Chavez's death - The ...www.washingtonpost.com › right-turn › 2013/03/06
Mar 6, 2013 — “Hugo Chavez was a tyrant who forced the people of Venezuela to live in fear. His death dents the alliance of anti-U.S. leftist leaders in South ..."

A little perspective for the objective reader https://fair.org/home/us-media-erase-years-of-chavismos-gains/

I'm not opening an account with the Washington Post to read the article, which seemed in a flash to be an opinion piece. Got anything else?
 
CA & NY to start with that DID play along. They knew they'd get a big taxpayer-paid pay day when it was all over so they let their businesses/cities get destroyed.

"blue states like NY and CA that played along and let their cities burn and businesses destroyed will magically
decide that everything should go back to "normal". Plus they'll have their hands out to receive a quadrillion dollars from the law abiding states to bail them out
as ordered by Chm. Jao. Typical pattern."

Are you fucking stupid or what? You keep repeating your initial clap trap, but in the INITIAL post you insinuated that THOSE STATES WHO DID NOT PLAY ALONG are doing so much better than NY and CA and will NOT need gov't assistance.

I asked for PROOF....to date you have none. Also, poster Guno showed how it's the RED STATES who get a bigger chunk of gov't assistance and put back LESS into the federal coffers than say NY or CA.

So put up or shut up, because you're not as dense as you pretend...just another insipidly stubborn and willfully ignorant right wing wonk.
 
That dimwit knows exactly what he said and what you asked. He’s a fucking liar, and of course, a dimwit. He thinks the virus is a hoax, but Jewish funded laser beams are real. He thinks socialism is bad, but he can’t afford to keep his parents alive, so socialism has to.

He thinks Arkansas is carrying NY and California:) pod think

A true dimwit and loser

Yep, a prime example of a right wing troll.....willfully ignorant, insipidly stubborn and chronic liars....just the type Trump wipes his feet on.
 
CA, NY, WA, OR, WI, MI have red or blue Guvs? What states allowed a summer of love
in the form of riots, burning and looting? What states now want bailouts from the taxpayers
to pay for their own self destruction?
 
CA, NY, WA, OR, WI, MI have red or blue Guvs? What states allowed a summer of love
in the form of riots, burning and looting? What states now want bailouts from the taxpayers
to pay for their own self destruction?

This is your original post: And, now that the political pandemic hoax is over, blue states like NY and CA that played along and let their cities burn and businesses destroyed will magically
decide that everything should go back to "normal". Plus they'll have their hands out to receive a quadrillion dollars from the law abiding states to bail them out
as ordered by Chm. Jao. Typical pattern.


Now, pay attention and read s-l-o-w-l-y; the ENTIRE U.S.A. has been affected to some degree or another. You claim that it's a "hoax" (parroted QAnon/Trump idiocy) and that its now "over" (more parroted QAnon idiocy). You name blue states like NY and CA as "playing along" with the "hoax" by letting their cities burn (how you connect the civil unrest born of protests over systemic police brutality to the Covid virus is a mystery I'm sure your fevered little brain can concoct a scenario for) and businesses be destroyed (all affected cities throughout America had various levels of quarantine and shut down) so they can get more gov't relief money (an amazing plot Machievelli would've thought up while smoking some serious weed).

So the question stands.....what red states do you name that did NOT follow the devious plot you lay out in the aforementioned? You were given PROOF by Guno that Red States receive the bulk of federal assistance money and pay back the least when compared to blue states. You have yet to factually disprove that evidence.

So spare us all the lame ass stall tactics and answer the freaking question. If you can't, just say so and admit error. No one knows you personally and the world will trundle on. If you can't but blow more smoke or parrot the SOS, the objective reader will see you for the buffoonish right wing troll that you are. Carry on.
 
:) you pod beings are too dumb to even know how brainless you sound given the truth of the last 4 years. Here you are trying to point fingers at me for “protecting the weath of millionaire libs” .. which makes no sense whatsoever when I’m arguing FOR SOCIALISM which millionaires typically run from .. but your glaring ignorance doesn’t stop there because it is YOU WHO PROTECT THE WEALTHY, NOT ME DUMMY. You had no problem with your god/king when he gave away trillions of US to the wealthy while I support direct payments to average Americans.

I don’t blame you for your lack of forethought before you make a fool of yourself because I recognize that you don’t have the capacity for forethought. Pod beings never do. Try again. :)

The very foundation principle of Socialism is Wealth Equality. Yet, from Anderson Cooper to Jack Doresey, almost all your Socialist leaders and spokespersons are obscenely wealthy.


If millions of children are starving in the USA, why won't they share their wealth? Why are they not held morally responsible for their own greedy immorality? Why are you happy with crumbs from their tables?

It boggles the mind. :palm:
 
I asked for PROOF....to date you have none. Also, poster Guno showed how it's the RED STATES who get a bigger chunk of gov't assistance and put back LESS into the federal coffers than say NY or CA.

That is a function of population density per square mile in a State, it has nothing to do with political party affiliation in anyway at all. :palm:

Guno and you make up all kinds of false causation links. :palm:
 
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
I asked for PROOF....to date you have none. Also, poster Guno showed how it's the RED STATES who get a bigger chunk of gov't assistance and put back LESS into the federal coffers than say NY or CA.


That is a function of population density per square mile in a State, it has nothing to do with political party affiliation in anyway at all. :palm:

Guno and you make up all kinds of false causation links. :palm:

Here stupid, learn something: https://smartasset.com/taxes/states-most-dependent-on-the-federal-government-2020

You and your brethren have for YEARS portrayed NY and CA (and any "blue" state) as wholly dependent on the Federal gov't, which is the basis as to their political leanings in the voting blocs.

That is flat out wrong, and when dopes like you repeat such knowing (or willfully ignorant) that it's wrong, you are lying.

And the arrow next to my name shows the reader the entire exchange, not just what you think you can excerpt to support YOUR OPINION (opinions are not facts, you nitwit).

Get your head out of Limbaugh's decaying ass and GTFU!
 
Here stupid, learn something: https://smartasset.com/taxes/states-most-dependent-on-the-federal-government-2020

You and your brethren have for YEARS portrayed NY and CA (and any "blue" state) as wholly dependent on the Federal gov't, which is the basis as to their political leanings in the voting blocs.

That is flat out wrong, and when dopes like you repeat such knowing (or willfully ignorant) that it's wrong, you are lying.

And the arrow next to my name shows the reader the entire exchange, not just what you think you can excerpt to support YOUR OPINION (opinions are not facts, you nitwit).

Get your head out of Limbaugh's decaying ass and GTFU!

I'm not going to search through your click-bait to find your quote for you. :palm:

As I said, it's a function of population density.
 
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Here stupid, learn something: https://smartasset.com/taxes/states-...overnment-2020

You and your brethren have for YEARS portrayed NY and CA (and any "blue" state) as wholly dependent on the Federal gov't, which is the basis as to their political leanings in the voting blocs.

That is flat out wrong, and when dopes like you repeat such knowing (or willfully ignorant) that it's wrong, you are lying.

And the arrow next to my name shows the reader the entire exchange, not just what you think you can excerpt to support YOUR OPINION (opinions are not facts, you nitwit).

Get your head out of Limbaugh's decaying ass and GTFU!


I'm not going to search through your click-bait to find your quote for you. :palm:

As I said, it's a function of population density.

Typical right wing flunky......he has neither the courage or honesty to read any information that may contradict his propagandistic rhetoric and beliefs. So instead he just bluffs, blusters and parrots.

This is just how Trump likes it....willfully ignorant and insipidly stubborn jokers like you follow his lead and NEVER admit you're wrong even in the face valid, documented historical FACTS. Hell, you make up your own "alternative facts" to support. That's why you don't have the stones for any real debate beyond a certain point. You're such a Big Dumb Dog to think that no one sees your silliness.
 
It always amazes me of how little real history Americans know about their own country.

Most have no idea, no clue who Otto Van Bismark was.

Do tell who the fuck Otto Van Bismark was? I never heard of him. :dunno:

You ever hear of Cuscowilla? :awesome:
Lemme tell you something, boy. I could walk the Florida Cracker Trail from where I live to US 27.
I know..
Wtf does some German dude in Europe have to do with us? What's his connection to the United States?

It doesn't seem like you're making any sense here.
You know who else I've heard of? Theodore Roosevelt. I'm thinking he was an alright cracker. Prove me wrong!
 
Last edited:
There will soon be more than 500,000 deaths from the coronovirus in the United States. We not only lead the world in deaths from the virus, it has also become the leading cause of death in this county .. all while we claim to have the best healthcare system in the world. The problem isn’t the healthcare system, the problem is the lack of attention to the American people by the previous cabal.

Joe Biden is desperate to change all that and he will use socialism to do it. Thus today defeating the virus is the number one mission in America and Biden will turn much of America’s resources inward toward the American people. Science will be employed to help solve the problems and resources will be directed to helping the American people and it’s communities. That’s called socialism, democratic socialism to be precise and it could not come soon enough.

Don’t like socialism or even calling it socialism? Fine, call it a chicken sandwich if it makes you feel better, but socialism is exactly what it is.

While I haven't previously commented on this thread, I decided to tonight.

Socialism won't solve the problem of Chinese Disease. The various pharma companies that developed vaccines did so in a Capitalist market. That is, they looked at the most cost effective and profitable means to quickly develop and test one, then used a similar Capitalist system to distribute it.

If we were to switch to Socialism to develop such a vaccine, then the government would be directing who does what research and how. There would be no incentive to do it quickly since the companies involved would make the same money regardless. Even now, Socialist methods of distribution are less effective as they don't consider the market or factors like cost and time. Instead, they would be focused on something like We want all of X group or Y minority to get the vaccine now. That means the vaccine isn't distributed efficiently but rather by political ends.

The second the government starts running the programs is the second the gears of progress become greased with sand.
 
Typical right wing flunky......he has neither the courage or honesty to read any information that may contradict his propagandistic rhetoric and beliefs. So instead he just bluffs, blusters and parrots.

This is just how Trump likes it....willfully ignorant and insipidly stubborn jokers like you follow his lead and NEVER admit you're wrong even in the face valid, documented historical FACTS. Hell, you make up your own "alternative facts" to support. That's why you don't have the stones for any real debate beyond a certain point. You're such a Big Dumb Dog to think that no one sees your silliness.

Post the relevant quote form your clickbait on here, dipshit.
 
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Typical right wing flunky......he has neither the courage or honesty to read any information that may contradict his propagandistic rhetoric and beliefs. So instead he just bluffs, blusters and parrots.

This is just how Trump likes it....willfully ignorant and insipidly stubborn jokers like you follow his lead and NEVER admit you're wrong even in the face valid, documented historical FACTS. Hell, you make up your own "alternative facts" to support. That's why you don't have the stones for any real debate beyond a certain point. You're such a Big Dumb Dog to think that no one sees your silliness.

Post the relevant quote form your clickbait on here, dipshit.

I gave you the link to the article, you preposterous right wing hound! READ IT! Or are you so intellectually limited that you can't comprehend anything beyond a short excerpt? No wonder you loved Limbaugh's fat ass so much, he just told you little snippets of truth compounded with his lies and you lapped it up like the Big Dumb Dog that you are.

Clickbait - a neologism used by intellectually dishonest and impotent right wing flunkies to justify NOT reading any material that can logically and factually disprove their beliefs and policies.


Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Here stupid, learn something: https://smartasset.com/taxes/states-most-dependent-on-the-federal-government-2020

You and your brethren have for YEARS portrayed NY and CA (and any "blue" state) as wholly dependent on the Federal gov't, which is the basis as to their political leanings in the voting blocs.

That is flat out wrong, and when dopes like you repeat such knowing (or willfully ignorant) that it's wrong, you are lying.

And the arrow next to my name shows the reader the entire exchange, not just what you think you can excerpt to support YOUR OPINION (opinions are not facts, you nitwit).

Get your head out of Limbaugh's decaying ass and GTFU!
 
Clickbait - a neologism used by intellectually dishonest and impotent right wing flunkies to justify NOT reading any material that can logically and factually disprove their beliefs and policies.
 
I gave you the link to the article, you preposterous right wing hound! READ IT! Or are you so intellectually limited that you can't comprehend anything beyond a short excerpt? No wonder you loved Limbaugh's fat ass so much, he just told you little snippets of truth compounded with his lies and you lapped it up like the Big Dumb Dog that you are.

Clickbait - a neologism used by intellectually dishonest and impotent right wing flunkies to justify NOT reading any material that can logically and factually disprove their beliefs and policies.


Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Here stupid, learn something: https://smartasset.com/taxes/states-most-dependent-on-the-federal-government-2020

You and your brethren have for YEARS portrayed NY and CA (and any "blue" state) as wholly dependent on the Federal gov't, which is the basis as to their political leanings in the voting blocs.

That is flat out wrong, and when dopes like you repeat such knowing (or willfully ignorant) that it's wrong, you are lying.

And the arrow next to my name shows the reader the entire exchange, not just what you think you can excerpt to support YOUR OPINION (opinions are not facts, you nitwit).

Get your head out of Limbaugh's decaying ass and GTFU!

So no relevant quote important enough to post here. Got it. :thup:
 
Last edited:
Back
Top