So who here think Kamala would have got the hostages out?

archives said:
Yes

This deal isn’t much different than a similar deal offered a year ago with similar Arab support, however, Netanyahu rejected it. What changed this time was when Israel bombed Qatar, Trump’s plane donors, Trump got pissed which scared Netanyahu relevant to Trump previously given him full reign.

Anyone elected who threaten to cut off Netanyahu would have bought Netanyahu to accept the deal
Click to expand...
Lie, lame and stupid. Arsecheese seems to be stuck on stupid and ignorant. ;)
 
Tobytone said:
Ah, there you have it: the quintessential libtard retort. I see Lurchy tossed you a thumbs-up for that stroke of genius. How revealingly, further confirmation, he might have a couple IQ points on you but he's just as dumb.

Either you just parroted this gem from one of the Drone Masters' playbooks or maybe one of The View girls, or it's the genuine article, a libtard brainwave forged in the fires of endless indoctrination and dose after dose of liptard dope.

You geniuses always pat yourselves on the back for uttering "I condemn that action," as if mere words summon miracles because, duh, Kamala's proclamation alone should seal the deal. Poof. Problem solved, right? 'Kamala why didn't you do more to solve the border crisis being the border czar?' Kamala responds, 'several times I condemned the border crisis and fought hard as a prosecutor going after cartels criminals that have entered our country and I've condemned that as well.' she solved that too, isn't she great.

Now, what exactly did Kamala propose to match Trump's actual wins? See if you can come up with two steps from any plan you've ever caught her mumbling. I'll spot you the opener: Step 1, she condemns the terrorists. Your move.
Click to expand...
Look dumbass. The claim was that Kamala didn't condemn Hamas or she was for them.
 
FastLane said:
I think the hostages would still be in their dungeons if Harris had been elected.
Click to expand...
I don't think Hamas would have attacked Israel had Harris been elected. I also don't think Israel would have done this much devastation had Harris been elected. Would she have gone for a deal to release the hostages, I think she would have done what was best for both sides....keep in mind, Benji the Jew was on the verge of being removed from power and locked the fuck up, so the Israelis leadership would have played a huge part in how to maneuver hostages releases had she been elected.
 
tigerred59 said:
I don't think Hamas would have attacked Israel had Harris been elected. I also don't think Israel would have done this much devastation had Harris been elected. Would she have gone for a deal to release the hostages, I think she would have done what was best for both sides....keep in mind, Benji the Jew was on the verge of being removed from power and locked the fuck up, so the Israelis leadership would have played a huge part in how to maneuver hostages releases had she been elected.
Click to expand...
You could have stopped at your first three words...
 
tigerred59 said:
Good dig, T-asty A-ss Gardner. Shout out to my fellow liberals here....when the brain dead attack rather than address, your saying something smart, accurate and to the point...and tasty ass just proved my point.
Click to expand...
The rest of your post was nothing more than your dumbassed opinion devoid of facts. There was nothing to address in it. Note: The Oct 7 attack occurred on Biden's watch and he did nothing other than mumble some crap about how he condemned Hamas for it. Given Biden's ineffectiveness in this matter, and Harris being ineffective in her time as VP, I'd say your opinion is based totally on fantasy, wishing, and bullshit.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top