So this is what takers do

apple0154 said:
What about Octomom?

"Nadya “Octomom” Suleman confirmed to The Huffington Post that despite her best intentions, she is back on government assistance. But she hopes to be off it again soon.

“Going through recovery was an important step for me to take,” Nadya says, referring to her decision to enter rehab. “Although it set me back financially a little bit, it was worth it.”

After going on welfare in March 2012, Nadya got off five months ago because she earned money from various appearances and her infamous masturbation video.

“My choice to go back on assistance is only a temporary one," she said. "At this time my family needs the medical, dental and food assistance because it is so expensive.”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/07/octomom-welfare_n_2425838.html?utm_hp_ref=celebrity&ncid

Your assertion that people on welfare are lazy just isn't true. Here we have a woman with that entrepreneurial spirit who managed to make a few dollars by producing a video. :)
Click to expand...
If she can't feed em, she shouldn't breed em.
Not my responsibility, not the taxpayers, just hers.
If she can't manage, remove the offspring and put it up for adoption.

Many couples would be overjoyed at the chance to adopt.
The child's life would be better too.
A loving stable home, with two parents earning and for providing for it.
Terrible in comparison to the hunger and neglect fostered by the welfare state!
 
History.
Welfare dosent work.
Welfare causes the breakdown of societies.
History shows this.
Read a book liberals, show me, in history or the present where a welfare state has remained viable?
 
evince said:
do you stand by the statement that most Americans have a post high school degree?
Click to expand...
Compared to most other lesser nations, yes.
47% of Americans hold a college degree.
You, in your liberal arrogance , are unable to see that there is more to education than a degree from a college.

A fully apprenticed journeyman carpenter, bricklayer, plumber or electrician has the equivalent of a degree in their profession.
An electrician has the equivalent if a masters in many states!
So yes!
Most americans( more that 50%) are educated.
But your war on workers disallows you from recognizing this.
 
evince said:
If you really think that a fact you are insane
Click to expand...

How long have you been a lonely old bag with only a couple of stinking felines to keep you company in your miserable final years?
How badly do you stink?
I bet you are one of those stinking old cat ladies that hang out by the boxed wines at the packy!!
Sifting through the 5 liter boxes of franzia trying to find the one with fewest blemishes!!
 
evince said:
so your going to PRETEND you didnt say what you did say?


see you are insane
Click to expand...
You smell of stale urine and selectively read things.
And you put words in people's mouths.
Your a smelly, bitter, malicious old cat lady, you stink of stale urine and cabbage, you enjoy franzia white Zin, no one knows for sure if you stink of stale cat urine, or your own!
You personally don't know either, that old franzia working its magic.
 
007 said:
Judging by your grammar, I would wager my education is above yours.
I just don't feel the need to boast.
You got a degree!!
Big wow.
Guess what?
So do I.
So do most people in the USA!
You think you are special?

Glad you admit that you despise workers.

Liberal war on workers people!!
See it here^
Click to expand...




this is why your party is in the tank.


You people LIE non stop and then refuse to admitt any of your lies are bullshit.


You refuse court documented evidence and sceintific facts to cling to a historically failed ideas.


you dont get far in life on lies, fact denial and bad charactor.
 
evince said:
this is why your party is in the tank.


You people LIE non stop and then refuse to admitt any of your lies are bullshit.

I
You refuse court documented evidence and sceintific facts to cling to a historically failed ideas.


you dont get far in life on lies, fact denial and bad charactor.
Click to expand...

What's this my party?
I'm one man voicing a well researched opinion on welfare and the toilet
Licking slime that use it.

Tell me, in history, where has a successful socialist state existed?

Tell me today, where is there a successful socialist state!

All these obamacult ideas have failed repeatedly elsewhere, yet somehow are destined to work here?

Repeating the same action whilst expecting a different outcome was described by one interesting fellow, by the name of Albert Einstein, as the definition of insanity.
The obamacult therefore subscribes to insane ideas.
 
007 said:
If she can't feed em, she shouldn't breed em.
Not my responsibility, not the taxpayers, just hers.
If she can't manage, remove the offspring and put it up for adoption.

Many couples would be overjoyed at the chance to adopt.
The child's life would be better too.
A loving stable home, with two parents earning and for providing for it.
Terrible in comparison to the hunger and neglect fostered by the welfare state!
Click to expand...

Would you have recommended abortion?
 
007 said:
What's this my party?
I'm one man voicing a well researched opinion on welfare and the toilet
Licking slime that use it.

Tell me, in history, where has a successful socialist state existed?

Tell me today, where is there a successful socialist state!

All these obamacult ideas have failed repeatedly elsewhere, yet somehow are destined to work here?

Repeating the same action whilst expecting a different outcome was described by one interesting fellow, by the name of Albert Einstein, as the definition of insanity.
The obamacult therefore subscribes to insane ideas.
Click to expand...

First of all a Socialist State implies the State owns the means of production, the banks, etc. How does that compare to anything Obama is doing?

As for social programs government medical has worked very well in many countries for over half a century. Norway has had a single payer system since 1912. Surely any system that has been operating for a century can not be considered a failed system.

Here's a list of countries that have had government medical for over 40 years.

Norway 1912
New Zealand 1938
Japan 1938
Germany 1941
Belgium 1945
United Kingdom 1948
Kuwait 1950
Sweden 1955
Bahrain 1957
Brunei 1958
Canada 1966
Netherlands 1966
Austria 1967
http://truecostblog.com/2009/08/09/countries-with-universal-healthcare-by-date/

Just think of all the lives that have been saved not to mention all the pain and disabilities that have been eliminated. And then consider the differences between those countries. For example: New Zealand with an area of 103,000 sq mi. and a population of 4.5 million compared with Australia with an area of almost 3 million sq mi. with a population of 22 million. 30 times larger than New Zealand with 5 times the population. Both have government medical showing that the size and population of a country has nothing to do with implementing a government medical plan. Every country that implemented a government medical plan has keep their plan at the insistence of the citizens. What more proof is necessary to show the superiority of government medical?
 
apple0154 said:
First of all a Socialist State implies the State owns the means of production, the banks, etc. How does that compare to anything Obama is doing?

As for social programs government medical has worked very well in many countries for over half a century. Norway has had a single payer system since 1912. Surely any system that has been operating for a century can not be considered a failed system.

Here's a list of countries that have had government medical for over 40 years.

Norway 1912
New Zealand 1938
Japan 1938
Germany 1941
Belgium 1945
United Kingdom 1948
Kuwait 1950
Sweden 1955
Bahrain 1957
Brunei 1958
Canada 1966
Netherlands 1966
Austria 1967
http://truecostblog.com/2009/08/09/countries-with-universal-healthcare-by-date/

Just think of all the lives that have been saved not to mention all the pain and disabilities that have been eliminated. And then consider the differences between those countries. For example: New Zealand with an area of 103,000 sq mi. and a population of 4.5 million compared with Australia with an area of almost 3 million sq mi. with a population of 22 million. 30 times larger than New Zealand with 5 times the population. Both have government medical showing that the size and population of a country has nothing to do with implementing a government medical plan. Every country that implemented a government medical plan has keep their plan at the insistence of the citizens. What more proof is necessary to show the superiority of government medical?
Click to expand...


AAaaaaaaaaaaannnnnnd POOF!!

you roll out the numbers showing how full of shit 00Psycho is and he scurries for the cover of dark.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top