So the Smithsonian can’t show that slavery was bad?

[christiefan915]

That would be nice but the Smithsonian has even made Steamboat Willy political . The slave exhibit isn't the only one that will be evaluated for wokeness.

You magas have "woke" on the brain, you're the only ones harping on that word. You think an impartial evaluation of history translates to "woke."

 

[Nomad]

You claim they did - stupid fuck.

Post it via quote then, you amoral lowlife piece of garbage.

It's one of the great myths you of the left perpetrate.

The Big Lie®

Says the shameless propagator of The Big (trump) Lie®

So you are saying that the slavers would try and protect their cargo? That's not the claim you posted before.

Poor noballs - painted himself into a corner with his stupidity again - now you lash out in frustration after being exposed as the uneducated, dolt we all know you to be.

Poor weak-ass, lame brained wannabe troll tries to twist my words around but lacks the cleverness required.

Uneducated2008

 

[TOP]

Let this Smithsonian do their evaluation...
Then if you don't like what they choose to do ...complain... You can boycott the museum...

 

[TOP]

Does the Smithsonian recognize N4T?

 

[Uncensored2008]

Post it via quote then, you amoral lowlife piece of garbage.

Says the shameless propagator of The Big (trump) Lie®

Poor weak-ass, lame brained wannabe troll tries to twist my words around but lacks the cleverness required.

Uneducated2008

Noballs...

 

[AProudLefty]

Intelligent hard working black people are Republicans - just as intelligent hard working white people are.

Your racism makes you see color of skin rather that content of character.


Yet it clearly is you.

You're the one who thinks Black Democrats are ignorant and lazy. That makes you racist.

 

[Yakuda]

You're the one who thinks Black Democrats are ignorant and lazy. That makes you racist.

Being democrat makes everyone ignorant and lazy. Race has nothing to do with it.

 

[AProudLefty]

Being democrat makes everyone ignorant and lazy. Race has nothing to do with it.

If that true, the entire economy would collapse. Sure you're intelligent?

 

[QP!]

This is precisely the problem we see in distributing information. You want to editorialize not inform. It's possible to report on the fact that slavery took place without having to decide for others if it was good or bad. If you don't know it's bad then you're morally fucked up. Since you're a leftist you're morally fucked up because you don't believe there's an absolute right or wrong. You can't can say there are no moral absolutes and they try to declare slavery is bad.

Smithsonian does not editorialize.

If you report on the ACTUAL HISTORY of Nazi's killing jews in WW2 or the American Slave journey, it is IMPOSSIBLE to properly record the history without using words that have a negative connotation as the actions were negative. Editorializing would be 'going into opinion' and they are not doing that in recording facts that were horrible.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Yes many slaves were sold to traders to be sold in the Colonies and States.

That’s a part of American History. How most of our African American people got here.

let me guess, you simply can't believe that there were black slave owners, can you? is that why you willfully ignored it?

 

[SmarterthanYou]

They are not equal. A couple of black slave owners is not the same as white plantation owners having 4 million slaves. White people beat, flogged, abused, and separated families ,selling their wives and children. Yes, white slavers were bad. Are you saying they were not? Are you saying a few black slave owners are equal to a slave industry? Don't wonder why the left laughs at the right. Logic and proportation are sloppy dead to the right,.

see, this is why nobody takes liberals seriously. you're basically saying that since it was only a handful of black people that owned black people, it's ok. black slavers isn't nearly as bad as white slavers ROFL

you can't make this lunacy up

 

[SmarterthanYou]

False. See above.

wrong, otherwise they wouldn't have tried to make it a 'complex issue alongside the broader narrative', which is 'white people bad'.

 

[QP!]

wrong, otherwise they wouldn't have tried to make it a 'complex issue alongside the broader narrative', which is 'white people bad'.

the problem you have is that you are lying and they never created that broader narrative.

Just as they did not say 'black people bad' despite presenting the history of black people also owning slaves in that time.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

the problem you have is that you are lying and they never created that broader narrative.

Just as they did not say 'black people bad' despite presenting the history of black people also owning slaves in that time.

the quote came from YOUR post, not mine. maybe you should check your sources before calling someone a liar.

 

[Yakuda]

If that true, the entire economy would collapse. Sure you're intelligent?

Aren't you dimwits always whining were on the edge of economic disaster? I'll save you the brain cells, you you are.

 

[Jarod]

Why is it silly? Because you don't like it? You want to decide what's good or bad for people. Trumps bad, correct? Simply because you think so. Who gives a fuck what you think or like?

It simply shows what happened, the fact that it is bad is not stated, Trump wants it changed so they do not continue to show how bad it was.


Should the holocaust museum stop showing how bad the holocaust was?

 

[Yakuda]

Smithsonian does not editorialize.

If you report on the ACTUAL HISTORY of Nazi's killing jews in WW2 or the American Slave journey, it is IMPOSSIBLE to properly record the history without using words that have a negative connotation as the actions were negative. Editorializing would be 'going into opinion' and they are not doing that in recording facts that were horrible.

What negative words? Nazis killed 6 million Jews. Blacks were slaves in America. Those are facts. That's all that's needed. People can decide for themselves what it means and if it was good or bad. Nobody needs you to tell them what's good or whats bad.

 

[AProudLefty]

Aren't you dimwits always whining were on the edge of economic disaster? I'll save you the brain cells, you you are.

Your side cries about it.

 

[Yakuda]

It simply shows what happened, the fact that it is bad is not stated, Trump wants it changed so they do not continue to show how bad it was.


Should the holocaust museum stop showing how bad the holocaust was?

I have no idea what you mean by "how bad it was". Beyond that the title of this thread is

So the Smithsonian can’t show that slavery was bad?​

It doesn't say

So the Smithsonian can’t show how bad slavery was?​

 

[Nomad]

I Have Noballs...

Tell us something we don't know.

.

Posting selfies again I see.

I'm still waiting for you to post the quote of me supposedly saying what you claimed I did.

But obviously you can't do it, so I'll take that cute little picture of you as an admission of your defeat.

Bye, loser.