So the Smithsonian can’t show that slavery was bad?

PP said they are focusing to much on how bad slavery was. Have you seen the Tubman exhibit? There is much, much more there than just her shawl.

In what way are they focusing to much on how bad slavery was?

Its notable that you will not answer that question.
Have you seen the Harriet Tubman exhibit? I certainly hope there is much more... Obviously the Smithsonian agrees that the exhibit needs refreshing and is doing its own evaluation... I don't know who PP is...
 
Its PP who claims that, he (as usual) did not offer any exhibits. I personally do not believe the evilness of slavery can be overstated.

I know they display one of many actual child size shackles that have been preserved.

They also show many uplifting success stories of some who escaped, and an entire display of Harriett Tubman who escaped and helped many others to do so.

How can the evil of slavery be overstated? That is what PP claimed, they overstate the how bad it was.
what i'm going to ask you requires a specific answer. Does the Smithsonian display the evils of slavery as a wholly white race inspired tragedy?
 
IN what way are they focusing to much on how bad slavery was?
As I said ithe Smithsonian is doing a reevaluation of what is included in the exhibits... I can't comment specifically because I haven't seen it In person ... Apparently you have... What concerns you about the possibility of Changes being made?
 
As I said ithe Smithsonian is doing a reevaluation of what is included in the exhibits... I can't comment specifically because I haven't seen it In person ... Apparently you have... What concerns you about the possibility of Changes being made?
I do not mind honest updating, but changing history is wrong.

In what way is the Smithsonian focusing to much on how bad slavery was?
 
what i'm going to ask you requires a specific answer. Does the Smithsonian display the evils of slavery as a wholly white race inspired tragedy?
Not slavery in general, but American slavery was almost wholly white race inspired. The only exception is the warlords of Africa who sold members of the civilizations they were able to kidnap.

There are all kinds of non-American slavery. The Smithsonian is mostly conglomerate of American History museums. There is the Natural History museum and some art museums that include non-American history, but they are not the American component. The Air and Space museum has some history of the Soviet space race, but mostly only as it relates to American advances in Air and Space.
 
what i'm going to ask you requires a specific answer. Does the Smithsonian display the evils of slavery as a wholly white race inspired

I do not mind honest updating, but changing history is wrong.

In what way is the Smithsonian focusing to much on how bad slavery was?
No one is changing history.... They are going to evaluate to see if they are focusing on all aspects of slavery and how It has impacted history.... What is it that worries you?
 
It's not that simple. Slavery was nuanced. Yes, the concept is awful but it's the execution, the way it actually was carried out, that matters.

How amusing -- a RWer trying to paint in shades of gray.

Salvery is wrong. Period. It doesn't matter if the enslaved human being was forcibly taken and sold/placed into slavery, or volunteered for whatever reason. It is still wrong. The end.
 
This is an example of how wokeness is injected into exhibits. Sometimes a cartoon is just a cartoon and not a political statement.


Mickey Mouse, a beloved American cultural icon, is not spared either. A display for the 1928 cartoon Steamboat Willie states, "Mickey challenged authority, but not everyone was in on the joke."

It continues: "Mickey Mouse debuted as the deckhand ‘Steamboat Willie’ in 1928, amidst a rising anxiety felt by many that modern living and city life were eroding family and community ties and loosening moral codes… But the new character’s outsized facial features, white gloves, and trickster temperament were vestiges of longstanding traditions of blackface minstrelsy."

 
So what does "triumph of slavery" mean?

It means another attempt by Desperation Debbie to backtrack on her original comments about the "good side" of slavery. Let us review.
And that is part of history... There were a lot of triumphs and accomplishments like that.... So yes good sides to slavery....What's this about cancellation from the twenty dollar bill?
 
Not slavery in general, but American slavery was almost wholly white race inspired. The only exception is the warlords of Africa who sold members of the civilizations they were able to kidnap.

There are all kinds of non-American slavery. The Smithsonian is mostly conglomerate of American History museums. There is the Natural History museum and some art museums that include non-American history, but they are not the American component. The Air and Space museum has some history of the Soviet space race, but mostly only as it relates to American advances in Air and Space.
in other words, the Smithsonian is not portraying American slavery in a historically accurate light. that's all you had to say
 
Never said they did it for the fuck of it, you ignorant low educated redneck slob.

They did it because they didn't have the technology to prevent it.

They obviously figured a certain amount of "lost product" into their projected income.

You ignorant piece of trash

They didn't destroy their cargo, limp dick.

You claim they did - stupid fuck.

It's one of the great myths you of the left perpetrate.

The Big Lie®

Some of their cargo perished during transport because they couldn't stop it.

So you are saying that the slavers would try and protect their cargo? That's not the claim you posted before.

You're an uneducated piece of sewage, uneducated.

Even today businesses figure a certain amount of product loss into their projections.

You obviously understand nothing about business, but then observing from behind the handle of a mop and a toilet scrubbing brush didn't show you much.

You fucking brain dead piece of garbage.

Poor noballs - painted himself into a corner with his stupidity again - now you lash out in frustration after being exposed as the uneducated, dolt we all know you to be.
 
How so? Have you been to the Smithsonian? There is an entire exhibit about the selling of conquered people in Africa by Africans. It was brutal.
Is it a complete and comprehensive representation of the history? You started the thread for some reason...what is it that actually concerns you? What do you think they're going to change? (You mentioned the "good and bad" sides of slavery , so I'm not sure why you would be concerned if someone commented once or twice on "sides", but then moved on to an actual discussion of what may be taking place...)
 
Back
Top