where is there hate? I think it is an interesting question.
Check BAC AKA blackasshole's rants.
where is there hate? I think it is an interesting question.
I think she meant "rudder". A rutter was a book of navigational data that ship pilots carried hundreds of years ago. I guess it could also refer to a deer in an amorous mood, but I don't think she meant that...or did she?
Check BAC AKA blackasshole's rants.
ummmmm BAC has been one of the most outspoken critics of going into syria. dont know why you would just throw his name into the mix.
and Bush STOPPED watching them you idiot
Of course it's what he should do...
Leave it to partisan Righties to slam him when he does as the Constitution says and seeks Congressional authorization.
Congressional Righties are TERRIFIED of having to espouse an opinion on this matter...once they do that they must defend their stance.
They were in the US and Clinton didn't have a clue....you're stupidity is growing past colossal....Bush couldn't stop watching them, nobody ever started to watch them, you fool.
Here is what I would do if I was Barack and I was hell bent on going through with this: i'd call John Boehner and Mitch McConnell up and have them come to the W.H., i'd make sure there were a pool of reporters with cameras and the whole nine yards and i'd say this: "hey John and Mitch, listen here, I don't want nor need your fucking opinions or authorization on anything, all you've done for the last 5-6 yrs is stall and play partisan politics so fuck you, listen to this boys"..........*picks up phone*, "commander, please commence with Operation Syria, thank you".
who said that you fucking lying sack of rat vomit?
LOL, she and the Congressional Dems who swallowed the intel had more access to sources than you, and they only jumped ship after it transpired that they were all wrong.
So they had more access than the Pres.? And you are admitting that they were purposely misled, thank you.
Then Biden would have to impeach him.....LMAO
http://tinyurl.com/ox6qr8d
"The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation."
.........the president HAS NO CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY to take this country to war against a country of 70 million people unless we're attacked or unless there is proof that we are about to be attacked. And if he does, I would move to impeach him. The House obviously has to do that, but I would lead an effort to impeach him.
http://tinyurl.com/lnn34ux
In 2007, Senator Joe Biden repeatedly threatened to lead an effort to impeach President George W. Bush in the House should he attack Iran without congressional authorization.
Unless you are the President, that isn't what I said, is it?
Enjoy this:
http://www.snopes.com/politics/war/wmdquotes.asp
BTW Gomer your links don't work, smarten up.
and Bush STOPPED watching them you idiot
They were in the US and Clinton didn't have a clue....you're stupidity is growing past colossal....
Bush couldn't stop watching them ???, nobody ever started to watch them, you fool.
where is your proof this evidence being presented is being lied about like the Bush team did about Iraq?