Snow storm coverage: How climate propaganda works

[tinfoil]

http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/oct2011/2011-10-30-01.html

at the end of the article about the north east snow storm :
Michael Mann, director of the Penn State Earth System Science Center, last February linked monster snowstorms with climate change, "This is what the models project," he said, "that we see more of these very large snowfalls."


LOL

Global warming models now predict snowfall in october. I had no idea

 

[The Dude]

What bs record snow this early in ny. Global cooling

 

[tinfoil]

just more proof that NOTHING is inconsistant with the predictions of anthropogenic global warming.

AGW FTW!!

 

[RockX]

:lol:

I bet the OWS protesters in NY were very cold, considering the NYFD took away their generators last Friday.


New York (FDNY) announced that it removed six generators and 13 fuel containers during a coordinated inspection this morning in Zuccotti Park. The FDNY released a statement about the inspection in the park known to the protesters as Liberty Square, where they have camped since Sept. 17. The occupants were “cooperative” during the 30 minute inspection, the fire department said.
“This action was taken to address the dangerous conditions posed by the presence and/or use of flammable and combustible liquids and portable generators in a public space, which is prohibited under New York City law,” the statement said.

 

[Lowaicue]

just more proof that NOTHING is inconsistant with the predictions of anthropogenic global warming.

AGW FTW!!

You are extremely clever. You have fashioned a world whose full extent is within your eyesight, whose only sounds are those that agree with you and where there are no shades of grey.
A perfect world for you, the perfect idiot.

 

[tinfoil]

You are extremely clever. You have fashioned a world whose full extent is within your eyesight, whose only sounds are those that agree with you and where there are no shades of grey.
A perfect world for you, the perfect idiot.

You can't find any argument... I get it.

My point is so rock solid you try an ad hom.

Newsflash, my friend. Freak snowstorms would be left out of consideration when talking about climate, which uses statistical methods that would exclude outlier events like an October snowstorm. I'm certain Mann would never make an assertion which is being implied by the article.

I'm not certain what you have a problem with here. Perhaps you can explain the reason you felt an ad hom attack was your best option in the debate.

 

[Lowaicue]

You can't find any argument... I get it.

My point is so rock solid you try an ad hom.

Newsflash, my friend. Freak snowstorms would be left out of consideration when talking about climate, which uses statistical methods that would exclude outlier events like an October snowstorm. I'm certain Mann would never make an assertion which is being implied by the article.

I'm not certain what you have a problem with here. Perhaps you can explain the reason you felt an ad hom attack was your best option in the debate.

Not exactly rock solid, fool. Just stony ground.
You clearly do not understand what a 'debate' is (no dont go and look it up in webster, I'm not interested). No, I have no intention of debating with you. My intention is to insult you and call you for what you are; a nasty, colour prejudiced, homophobic, ignorant, right wing yank.
There, that should make you happy. At least you should be able to understand that - even with your malformed brain.