‘Sluts’ Unite Against Republicans, Rush Limbaugh

signalmankenneth

Verified User
Watch out Republicans, here come the sluts.

Women’s rights activists are banding together to “Rock the Slut Vote” in an online effort to register women to vote and cast their ballots against Republicans in 2012.

“If the GOP thinks that throwing the word ‘slut’ at us at this point is going to silence women they have another thing coming,” said Susan McMillan Emry, the site’s founder.

Conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh thrust the derogatory word into the political arena in February when he called law student Sandra Fluke a “slut” for testifying before Congress in support of contraceptives.

Following the national backlash over Limbaugh’s name-calling, “Rock the Slut Vote” is now aiming to “defuse” the offensive term, Emry said.

Taking a vein from comedian Jeff Foxworthy and his “You might be a Redneck if…” jokes, Emry’s website gives visitors 22 reasons why “You might be a slut,” including “if you’ve ever used contraception” or “if you’re still downloading Dixie Chicks music” or “if you don’t go to church.”

The site aims to “re-appropriate” the word “slut” so that Limbaugh and other Republicans cannot use it to “bully and silence women,” Emry said.

“It’s really about taking the power away from that word more than it is about Rush Limbaugh,” she said. “He gave the word the notoriety but we are trying to take it back.”

Emry said the “Rush Limbaugh mess” coupled with the Susan G. Komen Foundation’s decision to cut Planned Parenthood funding and recent efforts in state Legislatures to restrict access to abortions and contraceptives “compelled” her to create the site after 56 years on the political sidelines.

“Originally my intention wasn’t so much to try to have a platform as to be able to find a voice myself through the website,” Emry said. “It was good for me personally because I felt so much outrage.”


But what began as way to vent her anger, has evolved into a voter registering, GOP “propaganda” refuting, women’s rights information hub where, Emry says, she hopes voters will come to learn more about the “war on women” before they head to the ballot box in November.

“It has evolved in the last few months from being my own personal avenue to let out a holler on what’s happening to something that we hope will make a significant impact,” she said.

But while the rather shocking name may catch voters’ eyes, Emry could have a hard time selling the message to prospective female voters.

Only three in 10 women said they believe there is a “wide-scale effort to limit women’s reproductive health choices and services,” according to a Kaiser Health Tracking poll in May. And just 5 percent of female voters said the issue they want candidates to talk about most is women’s health, compared to 60 percent who said the economy was most important.

Selling merchandise, on the other hand, hasn’t been as difficult. Her best-selling items are bumper stickers, T-shirts and totes that say “Rush Limbaugh thinks I’m a slut!” Emry said.

By Amy Bingham
list_girl_top.jpg

you_might_be.jpg


If you are a Liberal

If you are a Democrat

If you are an Independent

If you are a Republican who rejects the war on women

If you are raising strong, independent daughters

If you don't go to church

If you ever burned your bra

If you remember Woodstock

If you ever attended a sit-in

If you've ever used contraception

If you've ever been tested for an STD

If you voted for Hillary in 2008

If you've ever gone to Planned Parenthood

If you've ever donated to Planned Parenthood

If you've ever taken a pregnancy test

If you're single or the mom of a single mom

If you teach your daughters about safe sex

If you think being called a feminist is a compliment

If you don't want your employer policing your health care

If you're still downloading Dixie Chicks music

If you've ever lived with a boyfriend

If you want to marry your girlfriend

If you've ever been divorced

If you've ever had an abortion

If you speak up when they tell you to shut up

if_you_believe.jpg


Criminalizing contraception is wrong

Comprehensive, preventive women's health care is a right

What you do in your own bedroom is no one's business

Your relationship with your doctor is private

You get to make your own decisions about your body

One voice can make a difference

The war on women is real and must be stopped

That a vote for women's rights is a vote for everyone's rights

Women who unite and vote can change the world

Protecting women's rights should be a 'single-issue vote'

The war on women will be settled at the ballot box

go_forth.jpg


list_bottom.jpg

dancers.jpg
 
I picture SMK speaking in Squidward's voice...

"Spongebob! Be quiet! I'm trying to be boring..."
 
this time, the GOP is right...this bill is nothing but political bullshit.

if it was so important, why didn't obama and the dems put this forth earlier? oh wait....election trauma drama.

btw...there are already laws in place for this.
 
this time, the GOP is right...this bill is nothing but political bullshit.

if it was so important, why didn't obama and the dems put this forth earlier? oh wait....election trauma drama.

btw...there are already laws in place for this.

Yup. Both state and federal.
 
Yup. Both state and federal.

So how come women average 77 cents to every dollar earned by men for equivalent work?

The Paycheck Fairness Act would have:

  • Better aligned key Equal Pay Act defenses with those in Title VII.
  • Brought remedies available under the Equal Pay Act into line with remedies available under other civil rights laws.
  • Made the requirements for class action lawsuits under the Equal Pay Act match those of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
  • Protected employees who share their own salary information at work from retaliation by an employer.
The existing legal tools available to remedy pay discrimination are not enough.


http://www.enewspf.com/latest-news/...-equal-pay-and-the-paycheck-fairness-act.html
 
So how come women average 77 cents to every dollar earned by men for equivalent work?

The Paycheck Fairness Act would have:

  • Better aligned key Equal Pay Act defenses with those in Title VII.
  • Brought remedies available under the Equal Pay Act into line with remedies available under other civil rights laws.
  • Made the requirements for class action lawsuits under the Equal Pay Act match those of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
  • Protected employees who share their own salary information at work from retaliation by an employer.
The existing legal tools available to remedy pay discrimination are not enough.


http://www.enewspf.com/latest-news/...-equal-pay-and-the-paycheck-fairness-act.html

I've asked many people exactly how they figure this? Are they basing it on equal time/experience/education?

I have never worked for a place that doesn't have a method to ensure people in the same positions and with the same experience, performance, etc. have equal pay. Where are these places that hire a man and just give him more because he has a penis?
 
I've asked many people exactly how they figure this?

But you never researched it?

Interesting that you seem to dismiss the statistic without knowing how it was arrived at.

Are they basing it on equal time/experience/education?

According to data compiled by the Census Bureau, full-time female employees still make, on average, only 77 cents for every $1 earned by men.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/21/opinion/21thu3.html

I have never worked for a place that doesn't have a method to ensure people in the same positions and with the same experience, performance, etc. have equal pay.

And you knew this...how?

Where are these places that hire a man and just give him more because he has a penis?

In America, apparently.

http://www.infoplease.com/us/census/median-earnings-by-race.html
 
But you never researched it?

Interesting that you seem to dismiss the statistic without knowing how it was arrived at.



According to data compiled by the Census Bureau, full-time female employees still make, on average, only 77 cents for every $1 earned by men.


http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/21/opinion/21thu3.html
Which didn't answer my question... Your research seems to have as limited results as mine have had.


And you knew this...how?
Because it isn't hard to know the policy of the places you work when they are written and published for your own perusal. Any person with a job would know that you can do this.

Yet again you fail to answer the question that was actually proposed. Do you have RCDD?
 
So you doubt the Census data without knowing how it was compiled, believe that corporate policies prevent inequality, know how much all the men and women in your workplace earn, and have concluded that there's no need to address pay inequality?
 
So you doubt the Census data without knowing how it was compiled, believe that corporate policies prevent inequality, know how much all the men and women in your workplace earn, and have concluded that there's no need to address pay inequality?

So, you pretend that the information provided answers to questions it didn't answer?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top